The Efficacy and Safety of Medicurtain® in Patients With Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (Pivotal Study)

NCT ID: NCT04672421

Last Updated: 2021-09-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

107 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-18

Study Completion Date

2012-05-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of MEDICURTAIN. Patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly assigned either into Medicurtain® treatment group or non-treatment control group. Adhesion formations at 8 weeks after the index surgery were compared between the two groups by using the well-defined grade scale and image recording.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was designed as multi-center, randomized, evaluator-blinded, comparative study. Subjects were woman between 20\~80 years of age reserved with total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Subject screening was conducted for the subject who signed an informed consent form. Subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned into either treatment (Medicurtain®) or control group.

Each subject visit clinic for follow-up examination 1week (Visit 2) and 8 weeks (Visit 3) after the index surgery and before the visit subjects were received phone calls. Since the target population was the patient who scheduled elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy, subjects who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria after the examination for the surgery signed on the informed consent at Visit 1 (Baseline: 0 day) and randomly assigned either into the treatment and control group.

At visit 2 (1week±2days), 1week after the index surgery adverse events and general health were examined. At visit 3 (8week±5days), 8 weeks after the index surgery, the investigator inserted endoscope into abdominal cavity and took video clip and still images. If it was necessary, adhesion was removed surgically. An independent evaluator evaluated the records and graded the adhesion rate and its severity according to the grading system. If it was difficult to collect images with endoscope, the investigators recorded his observation for statistical analysis.

The investigator inserted endoscope into abdominal cavity and took video clip and still images at 8weeks after total laparoscopic hysterectomy to evaluate the adhesion formation and its grade. An independent evaluator evaluated the records and graded the adhesion rate and its severity according to the grading system. If it was difficult to collect images with endoscope, the investigators recorded his observation for statistical analysis. The adhesion grading system was proposed by American Fertility Society (AFS) in 1988, grades adhesion with Grade 0, Grade 1, Grade2 and Grade 3. Grade 0 means there is no adhesion formation, Grade 1\~Grade 3 means there is adhesion formed, severity increases with the grade. Adhesion rate and grade were evaluated between the treatment and control groups suing Grade 0\~3 scales.

General safety of the study device was evaluated based on the adverse event rate, laboratory tests, ECG test. The laboratory tests were conducted before and after the index surgery to evaluate whether the device cause toxicity such as hepatic and renal toxicity for safety evaluation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparoscopy Tissue Adhesion, Surgery-Induced Leiomyoma of the Uterine Body

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Evaluator-blinded

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Medicurtain®

Treat Medicurtain® 5ml prefilled syringe after laparoscopic surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Medicurtain®

Intervention Type DEVICE

Anti-adhesion barrier (Medicurtain® 5ml prefilled syringe after laparoscopic surgery)

Placebo

laparoscopic surgery

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DEVICE

No device after laparoscopic surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medicurtain®

Anti-adhesion barrier (Medicurtain® 5ml prefilled syringe after laparoscopic surgery)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placebo

No device after laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Woman who is between 20\~80 years of age.
* Woman who is reserved with total laparoscopic hysterectomy like:

* Malignant neoplasm of cervix
* Malignant neoplasm of uterine body
* Unspecified malignant neoplasm of cervical region
* Other and unspecified malignant neoplasm of the female reproductive system
* Carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* Other and unspecified carcinoma in situ of the reproductive system Leiomyoma of the uterus
* Other benign neoplasms of uterus
* Neoplasm of uncertain behavior of uterus
* Endometriosis
* Polyp of corpus uteri
* Other noninflammatory disorders of uterus, except cervix
* Cervical dysplasia
* Congenital malformations of uterus and cervix
* Injury of uterus
* Woman who signed and informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of tumor or inflammatory disease in other organs after the laparoscopy or laparoscopic surgery
* Subjects with a history of open surgery or laparoscopic surgery
* Subject who is not eligible for anesthesia or re-operation due to other disease confirmed by investigator
* Subject who is not eligible for re-operation or laparoscopy after laparoscopic surgery
* Subjects using coagulant and subjects with lymphoid disease
* Diabetic subjects administrating oral or parenteral glucose-lowering drugs
* Patients with autoimmune diseases or immune disorders
* Liver disease or kidney disease, surgical subjects including open surgery of gastrointestinal or urinary system
* Subjects judged as inadequate by investigator
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shin Poong Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Young-Tak Kim, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Asan Medical Center, Seoul Asan Medical Center Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea

Tae Jin Kim, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cheil General Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center, 1-19 Mukjeong-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea

Yong-Il Kwon, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, (Gil 1dong445) 150, Seongnae-gil, Gwangsan-gu, Gwangju, Korea

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Asan Medical Center

Seoul, Seoul Asan Medical Center Gil, Songpa-gu, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMT2009-SP-ASMC-0301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of In-bag Morcellation
NCT03281460 COMPLETED NA
The Hysteroscopic Morcellator (HM).
NCT01537822 COMPLETED NA