Pelvic Floor Magnetic Stimulation in Men With Radical Prostatectomy
NCT ID: NCT04644614
Last Updated: 2022-11-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-01
2023-04-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
MS is a more acceptable, relatively painless, non-invasive and suitable electrical treatment method for patients with UI (5).
Data from studies suggest that MS may be beneficial for patients with UI after RP (1,2,5,6,7). In the literature, there are only 3 randomized controlled trials evaluating MS efficacy using a magnetic chair in patients with UI after RP (1,6,8) and one of them was published in Korean (6) and two of them in English(1,8). In these studies, MS was compared with pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) or electrical stimulation (ES) (intra-anal).Yokoyama et al.reported that MS and ES treatments had shown to provide earlier continence compared to the control group after RP. MS and ES are recommended as options for patients who want rapid recovery of postoperative UI(1).
Liu et al reported that MS was more effective than PTKE on incontinence symptoms and quality of life (8). However, as far as we know, there is no prospective randomized sham-controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of MS in patients with post-RP UI. In addition, there are no suggestions regarding MS in the guidelines on urinary incontinence management due to insufficient data (9). In this study, sham-controlled efficacy of MS will be evaluated in patients with UI after RP.
Our study is the first prospective randomized controlled trial comparing MS and Sham MS efficacy in patients with UI after RP. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MS on incontinence related clinical parameters, quality of life, sexual functions, depression and anxiety in patients with UI after RP.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electrical Stimulation in Men With Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT05236140
Is the HIFEM Procedure an Effective Treatment for Men With Post-prostatectomy Incontinence?
NCT06372704
Comparison of the Efficacy of Perineal and Anal Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT06669468
The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy
NCT05236088
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training With Aerobic Exercise and Relaxation After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT07172854
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After the approval of XXX Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee, 40 patients who admitted to XXX PMR Polyclinic with RP complaints after UI and who accepted the inclusion criteria directed to the Urogynecological Rehabilitation Unit, will be included in the study.
Patients will be informed about the content, purpose and application of the study and their written consent will be obtained.
Treatment Protocol 40 men with UI after RP who meet the exclusion and inclusion criteria will be divided into 2 groups using a table of random numbers. MS will be applied to the first group and sham MS will be applied to the second group.
Group 1: Magnetic stimulation (Active MS) Group 2: Sham MS
Group 1: Magnetic stimulation (Active MS)
Patients will be instructed to sit in a magnetic coil chair. Magnetic flux is generated in this field. This current stimulates the nerve or muscle of the pelvic floor. To administer MS, a stimulation amplitude of 200 μs and a repetition of 10 Hz for 10 minutes, 2 minutes rest in between, 50 Hz for 10 minutes (20 minutes total), 5 seconds on / 5 seconds off, in accordance with device literature will be adjusted to produce maximum stimuli with the cycle. During each treatment session, the device will be adjusted to receive patients the current intensity gradually increasing, reaching the maximum stimulation intensity. MS will be applied two days a week, 20 minutes a day, for 8 weeks, a total of 16 sessions.
Group 2: Sham MS
The Sham MS treatment program will be the same as active MS in terms of duration, frequency, current duration, current intensity and general patient experience. The same magnetic chair will be used for both groups. Sham therapy application will be applied by the coordinator of the study by placing a thin deflector lead / aluminum coated plate on the magnetic coil of the magnetic chair that prevents the magnetic flux from penetrating into the patient.
During both applications, the patients will be exposed to the same sound, vibration sensation and lighting of the device.
Patients who did not attend even one of the 16 sessions (MS and sham MS sessions) during the study period will be excluded from the study. Until the study is completed, patients will not be informed of what treatment they received. At the end of the treatment, patients in the sham group will be allowed to receive active MS treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1: Magnetic Stimulation
Patients will be instructed to sit in a magnetic coil chair. Magnetic flux is generated in this field. This current stimulates the nerve or muscle of the pelvic floor. To administer MS, a stimulation amplitude of 200 μs and a repetition of 10 Hz for 10 minutes, 2 minutes rest in between, 50 Hz for 10 minutes (20 minutes total), 5 seconds on / 5 seconds off, in accordance with device literature will be adjusted to produce maximum stimuli with the cycle. During each treatment session, the device will be adjusted to receive patients the current intensity gradually increasing, reaching the maximum stimulation intensity.
Magnetic Stimulation - Armchair type
MS and Sham MS will be applied two days a week, 20 minutes a day, for 8 weeks, a total of 16 sessions.
Group 2: Sham Magnetic Stimulation
The Sham MS treatment program will be the same as active MS in terms of duration, frequency, current duration, current intensity and general patient experience. The same magnetic chair will be used for both groups. Sham therapy application will be applied by the coordinator of the study by placing a thin deflector lead / aluminum coated plate on the magnetic coil of the magnetic chair that prevents the magnetic flux from penetrating into the patient.
During both applications, the patients will be exposed to the same sound, vibration sensation and lighting of the device.
Magnetic Stimulation - Armchair type
MS and Sham MS will be applied two days a week, 20 minutes a day, for 8 weeks, a total of 16 sessions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnetic Stimulation - Armchair type
MS and Sham MS will be applied two days a week, 20 minutes a day, for 8 weeks, a total of 16 sessions.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Men with RP with incontinence over ≥50 g / 24 hours
3. Patients within 1 month to 1 year after catheter removal
4. Willingness to complete and do the quality of life scale
5. Understanding procedures, benefits, and possible side effects
6. Being able to give written, informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous urological surgery history
3. UI history before RP
4. Transurethral resection of the prostate due to benign prostatic hyperplasia
5. Patients receiving radiotherapy
6. Presence of urinary tract infection
7. Heart failure, presence of a pacemaker, implanted defibrillator
8. Continuing treatment for arrhythmias
9. Undiagnosed lower abdominal pain
10. Electronic device or metallic implant applied to the areas between the lumbar region and lower extremities
11. Use of drugs that may affect bladder function (antimuscarinic, duloxetine, tricyclic antidepressant, etc.)
12. History of neurogenic bladder, peripheral or central neurological pathology
18 Years
80 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pamukkale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Necmettin Yildiz
PAU
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Necmettin Yildiz
Denizli, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Unal B, Sarsan A, Yildiz N, Alkan H. Efficacy of Magnetic Stimulation in Men With Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Jun;44(5):1140-1148. doi: 10.1002/nau.70055. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Study Protocol
View DocumentOther Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
60116787-020/38072
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.