The Efficacy of Goal Focused, Non-Pharmacological Treatment for Persons With ADHD/ADD.
NCT ID: NCT04638283
Last Updated: 2022-02-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-08-15
2022-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The intervention consists of:
1. Eight psycho-educative group sessions focusing on Goal Management Training (GMT), a method aiming to enhance goal directed behavior, developed by Levine and colleagues in 2011.
2. Four individual sessions where the participants are guided through the process of formulation individual goals for improving functioning in everyday life. The method used for goal setting is Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), developed by Kiresuk and Sherman in 1968.
3. Bi-weekly telephone follow up the first three months preceding the group sessions, focusing on the attainment of GAS-goals.
Adult participants with ADHD/ADD are recruited from the outpatient psychiatric health care clinic, DPS Nedre Romerike at Akershus University Hospital and are randomized into either 1) an intervention-group, receiving the intervention described above or 2) a control-group receiving treatment as usual.
It is hypothesized that the intervention will improve executive functioning, reported ADHD-symptoms and psychological well-being. It is also hypothesized that the participants sucessfully will formulate and implement GAS-goals and that goal attainment will sustain throughout the follow-up phase.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Peer Co-led Educational Group Intervention for Adults With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
NCT03547843
Psychoeducational Groups for Adults With ADHD
NCT03337425
Executive Control Training for Adolescents With ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial
NCT05874791
Effects of Structured Skills Training Group in Treatment of ADHD in Adults
NCT02685254
Feasibility Trial of a Guided Internet-delivered Intervention for Adolescents With ADHD
NCT06711224
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Goal Management Training (GMT) (Levine et al, 2011) is a theory-driven intervention relying on metacognitive strategies to reengage endogenous attention processes, in addition to teaching problem-solving techniques to improve goal-directed capacity. GMT draws upon theories regarding sustained attention, mindfulness and goal processing. The aim is to increase awareness of errors and strategies while facing complex, everyday challenges. The patient learns to stop ongoing behavior, define goal hierarchies and to adjust and monitor goals. Generalization to everyday-life is heavily emphasized.
In previous studies, GMT has been shown to improve goal directed behaviour including generalization effects to daily life and psychological well-being in various neurological conditions, e.g. acquired brain injury and spina bifida (Hypher et al, 2019; Stubberud et al, 2014; TornĂ¥s et al, 2016) and normal ageing (Levine et al, 2007). The evidence of GMT in the adult ADHD populations is scarce.
To the investigators knowledge, this is the first trial combining group based, GMT and individual goal setting within the frame of a psycho-educative, cognitive rehabilitation intervention in order to help adults with ADHD cope with executive problems in everyday life.
Research questions and hypotheses
1. Does the intervention combining GMT, psychoeducation and implementation of GAS goals result in improvements in executive problems for adults with ADHD when compared to treatment as usual (TAU)? Hypothesis 1: Post intervention changes in executive functions will be reflected in improved scores on a measure pertaining to daily life executive function (BRIEF-A) at five- and eights months follow up.
2. Does the intervention result in improvements of reported ADHD symptoms when compared to TAU? Hypothesis 2: Post intervention changes in ADHD-symptoms will be reflected in improved scores on a measure pertaining to ADHD-symptoms (ASRS-v1.1) at five and eight months follow-up.
3. Does participation in the intervention improve psychological well-being when compared to TAU? Hypothesis 3: Post intervention changes in psychological well-being will be reflected in improved scores on a measure pertaining to psychological well-being (HSCL-25) at five and eight months follow-up.
4. Will the participants succeed in attaining individual GAS goals for coping with executive problems? Hypothesis 4: The participants will successfully formulate and implement GAS-goals for coping with executive problems in everyday life. Goal attainment will sustain throughout the three-month long implementation phase and sustain until the eight month follow up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interventioh group
The intervention consists of
1. Eight group sessions of two hours duration, focusing on GMT and ADHD. The Group consists of six participants and is directed by one neuropsychologist and one psychologist.
2. Four individual sessions with the neuropsychologist/psychologist directing the Group where the participant is guided through the process of formulating GAS-goals.
3. Bi-weekly Telephone follow up focusing on GAS-goal attainment the thre first months following the Group session phase.
Goal Attainment Scaling
Individual goals will be formulated and measured by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). GAS provides a method for quantifying the attainment of individualized goals, typically set in cognitive rehabilitation. Different levels of outcomes for each goal are operationalized in a five-point scale and given a numeric value. For each individual goal, minus two refers to the goal attainment much less than expected, minus one refers to a little less than expected, zero refers to expected outcome, plus one refers to a little bit better than expected and plus two refers to goal attainment much better than expected. The participants can establish as many goals as desired. Outcomes can be summed within different patient goals, as well as across patients to assess overall outcome of treatment outcomes.
Control Group
Participants in the Control Group receive TAU. Participation in the study does not influence decisions regarding pharmacological interventions in either of the groups.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Goal Attainment Scaling
Individual goals will be formulated and measured by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). GAS provides a method for quantifying the attainment of individualized goals, typically set in cognitive rehabilitation. Different levels of outcomes for each goal are operationalized in a five-point scale and given a numeric value. For each individual goal, minus two refers to the goal attainment much less than expected, minus one refers to a little less than expected, zero refers to expected outcome, plus one refers to a little bit better than expected and plus two refers to goal attainment much better than expected. The participants can establish as many goals as desired. Outcomes can be summed within different patient goals, as well as across patients to assess overall outcome of treatment outcomes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subjective complaints about executive problems affecting everyday life, operationalized as a score of 60 or above on BRIEF-A or as reported in the inclusion interview.
3. Motivation for working with the executive problems in order to increase coping in everyday life.
4. Adequate language skills to participate in group discussions without any need for an interpreter.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Ongoing substance-abuse.
3. Psychopathology that would negatively interfere with participation in the intervention, e.g. ongoing psychosis, present suicidal risk to severe to be treated in an out-patient setting or personality disorders considered to severe to be treated in a group-based out-patient setting.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Oslo
OTHER
University Hospital, Akershus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kjersti Traeland Hanssen
PhD/Clinical neuropsychologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kjersti T Hanssen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Akershus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Akershus University Hospital, DPS Nedre Romerike, Postboks 1000
Loerenskog, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kessler RC, Adler L, Ames M, Demler O, Faraone S, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Jin R, Secnik K, Spencer T, Ustun TB, Walters EE. The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychol Med. 2005 Feb;35(2):245-56. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704002892.
Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968 Dec;4(6):443-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01530764.
Levine B, Schweizer TA, O'Connor C, Turner G, Gillingham S, Stuss DT, Manly T, Robertson IH. Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Feb 17;5:9. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00009. eCollection 2011.
Levine B, Stuss DT, Winocur G, Binns MA, Fahy L, Mandic M, Bridges K, Robertson IH. Cognitive rehabilitation in the elderly: effects on strategic behavior in relation to goal management. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Jan;13(1):143-52. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707070178.
Rabin LA, Roth RM, Isquith PK, Wishart HA, Nutter-Upham KE, Pare N, Flashman LA, Saykin AJ. Self- and informant reports of executive function on the BRIEF-A in MCI and older adults with cognitive complaints. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):721-32. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
Hypher RE, Brandt AE, Risnes K, Ro TB, Skovlund E, Andersson S, Finnanger TG, Stubberud J. Paediatric goal management training in patients with acquired brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e029273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029273.
Stubberud J, Langenbahn D, Levine B, Stanghelle J, Schanke AK. Emotional health and coping in spina bifida after goal management training: a randomized controlled trial. Rehabil Psychol. 2015 Feb;60(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/rep0000018. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
Tornas S, Lovstad M, Solbakk AK, Schanke AK, Stubberud J. Goal Management Training Combined With External Cuing as a Means to Improve Emotional Regulation, Psychological Functioning, and Quality of Life in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Nov;97(11):1841-1852.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Hanssen KT, Brevik EJ, Smastuen MC, Stubberud J. Improvement of anxiety in ADHD following goal-focused cognitive remediation: a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 17;14:1212502. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212502. eCollection 2023.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Goal Focused ADHD Treatment
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.