Perceived Effectiveness of Added Sugar Labels

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1448 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-13

Study Completion Date

2020-12-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to develop a restaurant menu label to indicate foods and beverage items on restaurant menus that contain high amounts of added sugars and to test its perceived effectiveness.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Effect of Added-sugar Menu Labels

NCT06666725

Nutrition Knowledge Dietary Behaviour

COMPLETED NA

Menu Label Noticeability

NCT06204913

Noticing Nutrition Information Recalling Nutrition Information

COMPLETED NA

Salt Warning Label Restaurant Study

NCT06458270

Food Selection

COMPLETED NA

Impacts of Sugar Warnings on Weight Bias

NCT07346001

Nutrition Diet Interventions

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Evaluation of a Beverage Media Campaign and Added-sugar Warning Labels

NCT05563181

Attitude Intention

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives and hypotheses:

The goal of this study is to examine how added sugar restaurant menu labels influence U.S. adults' perceptions and reactions. Predictions:

In a between-subjects experiment with 3 arms (control label, icon-only added sugars label, and icon plus text added sugars label):

1. Added sugar labels will be perceived as more effective than the control label.
2. The text plus icon label will be perceived as more effective than the icon-only label.
3. A larger proportion of participants who see the added sugar labels will report learning something new than those who see the control label.
4. Added sugar labels will lead participants to more accurately identify restaurant menu items high in added sugars compared to the control label, and the text plus icon label will outperform the icon-only label on this outcome.

Additionally, using a within-subjects design:

The study will examine which label (control, icon, text plus icon) most discourages wanting to consume menu items high in added sugars.

Analyses will compare various icon and text options for the added sugars label to determine which icon and which text variations are perceived as most discouraging for wanting to consume items high in added sugars. The is no hypothesis about which will be perceived as more discouraging.

Planned analyses:

For predictions 1-2: linear regression model (OLS) regressing PME on indicator variables for experimental condition. The margins command in STATA will be used to conduct pairwise comparisons between each condition (i.e., icon-only vs. icon plus text label). Also, PME will be regressed on an indicator variable combining the added sugar label groups.

For predictions 3-4, Poisson regression with robust standard errors will be used to estimate relative probability, regressing each dichotomous outcome on indicator variables for experimental condition. The margins command in STATA will be used to conduct pairwise comparisons between each condition. The outcomes will be regressed on an indicator variable combining the added sugar label groups. If the Poisson regressions do not converge, logistic regression will be used.

For the within-subjects comparisons, mixed effects linear models will be used to assess the relationship between condition and rating of label discouragement for consuming items high in added sugars.

A critical alpha 0.05 will be used, and statistical tests will be two-tailed. Because this is an initial, exploratory study to help identify the best performing label to use in a larger trial, alpha level will not be adjusted to control for multiple comparisons.

If there is evidence of deviations from modeling assumptions required for the parametric tests above, non-parametric sensitivity analyses will be conducted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Knowledge Attitude to Health

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study uses both a between- and within-subjects design.

Between-subjects design: Participants will be randomized to view restaurant menu items with a control label (QR code) or either one of two added sugars labels: an icon based label or the same icon plus text. (Within the icon condition, participants will be randomized to view 1 of 6 label icons. In the icon plus text condition, participants will be randomized to see 1 of 3 text options accompanying 1 of the 6 icons.

Within-subjects design:

To identify which label is perceived as most discouraging, participants will view the 3 labels one-by-one in random order, for a total of 3 conditions.

To identify which design variations in icon and text are perceived as most discouraging, participants will view 6 icon-only labels one-by-one in random order. Then participants will view each of the 3 text variations together with one of the icons one-by-one in random order.

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control label

Participant will see a QR code and footnote saying, "Scan the QR code for more menu information." The label will be applied to all menu items displayed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Menu label

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be shown a sample of items from a restaurant menu, displayed with labels

Icon plus text added sugars label

Participant will see a label containing an icon plus text label with an explanatory footnote. The label will be applied to items high in added sugars (exceeding half the daily value). Participants will randomly view one of 18 variations of icons and text in this arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Menu label

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be shown a sample of items from a restaurant menu, displayed with labels

Icon only added sugars label

Participant will see a label containing an icon only with an explanatory footnote. The label will be applied to items high in added sugars (exceeding half the daily value). Participants will randomly view one of 6 variations of icons in this arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Menu label

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be shown a sample of items from a restaurant menu, displayed with labels

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Menu label

Participants will be shown a sample of items from a restaurant menu, displayed with labels

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Equal or greater than 18 years of age
* Less than 100 years of age
* English-speaking
* U.S. residents
* Had to have purchased food from a restaurant at least once per month prior to the COVID-19 pandemic
* Participants will reflect the U.S. Census Bureau's 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates for gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and age

Exclusion Criteria

* Failing the attention check question
* Completing the survey in less than 30% of the median completion time
* Straightlining
* Providing nonsensical responses to open-ended questions

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes