Detection of Renal Fibrosis and Prediction of Kidney Function Decline
NCT ID: NCT04625140
Last Updated: 2023-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
72 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-01
2025-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Urinary Biomarkers as Predictors on Renal Function in Congenital Hydronephrosis
NCT00568724
Applications of MRI in Kidney Disease
NCT02832505
Kidney Function in People With Cystic Fibrosis in the Era of HEMT
NCT06595420
Multiparametric MRI in Healthy Volunteers and CKD Patients
NCT05229263
Assessment of Renal Artery Fibromuscular Dysplasia: From Diagnosis to Treatment
NCT02586870
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, the evaluation of fibrosis from a renal biopsy is limited by the risk of complications. Due to its invasive nature, clinicians often reserve a biopsy for situations where the anticipated yield will have therapeutic value. This means the fibrotic burden is often not assessed, and information on scar burden and kidney-prognosis is lost. Furthermore, we know that fibrosis may be unequally distributed throughout the kidney. Since a biopsy only samples a small portion of kidney tissue, it is inherently susceptible to sampling bias.
In contrast, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques can assess whole organ fibrotic burden. Since it is a non-invasive procedure, MRI can evaluate renal fibrosis in patients not eligible for renal biopsy. Moreover, it can be performed at several time-points for temporal renal fibrosis assessments. Recent developments in MRI techniques have made it possible to assess renal fibrosis with MRI. These techniques rely on the different biological properties of fibrotic and non-fibrotic tissues, including reduced microcirculation, restriction of water motion and reduced oxygenation. From several MRI biomarkers currently available, five show particular promise in quantifying degree of renal fibrosis: Diffusion weighted MRI, T1-mapping and T2-mapping, T1-rho and arterial-spin labelling. A recently developed MRI-patch which combines these five techniques, makes it possible to perform a MRI-scan with simultaneous measurements whilst not prolonging examination time for the patient. We hypothesize that combining these MRI-techniques will give additional information, and thus provide a better correlation to histological-assessed fibrosis than any technique alone.
Markers of renal ageing may also predict development of renal fibrosis as accelerated renal ageing trough p16INK4a pathway activation, leading to cellular senescence, is involved in the development of renal fibrosis in CKD. Senescent cells are characterized by irreversible growth arrest and express a pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic senescent-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). This biochemical foot print can be detected by immunohistochemistry. We aim to assess the correlation between degree of renal fibrosis and markers of renal ageing, as well as to what extent decline in kidney function can be predicted by change in markers of renal ageing.
This study will be one of the first to evaluate correlation between multiparametric MRI and morphometric estimates of renal fibrosis. We will study whether activation of pathways involved in renal ageing are associated with progressive renal fibrosis and deterioration of renal function. Finally, we will evaluate the utility of temporal measurements of renal fibrosis for prediction of renal function deterioration with a non-invasive method.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with claustrophobia.
* Patients with implanted metal devices which are not compatible with MRI.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital
OTHER
University Hospital, Akershus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christian Aalborg
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
My Hanna Sofia Svensson, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Hospital, Akershus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Akershus University Hospital
Oslo, Lørenskog, Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020_161
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.