Genotyping of Ebus-tbna Supernant Cell-free Dna in Nsclc

NCT ID: NCT04624373

Last Updated: 2025-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The wide uptake of "liquid biopsy" diagnostics in the care of advanced cancer patients highlights the desire for improved access to tumor allowing accurate tumor genotyping (1). Genotyping of plasma cfDNA is now routine for detection of EGFR driver mutations at diagnosis of NSCLC, or for detection of the EGFR T790M mutation after TKI resistance, and is an emerging approach for the detection of other drivers (HER2 or BRAF mutations, ALK or ROS1 fusions…) (2) or the estimation of tumor mutation burden (TMB) (3). However, the most sensitive plasma genotyping platforms still have a sensitivity of only 70%-80%, such that a negative result requires tissue biopsy confirmation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The wide uptake of "liquid biopsy" diagnostics in the care of advanced cancer patients highlights the desire for improved access to tumor allowing accurate tumor genotyping (1). Genotyping of plasma cfDNA is now routine for detection of EGFR driver mutations at diagnosis of NSCLC, or for detection of the EGFR T790M mutation after TKI resistance, and is an emerging approach for the detection of other drivers (HER2 or BRAF mutations, ALK or ROS1 fusions…) (2) or the estimation of tumor mutation burden (TMB) (3). However, the most sensitive plasma genotyping platforms still have a sensitivity of only 70%-80%, such that a negative result requires tissue biopsy confirmation. This poses a clinical challenge because negative plasma genotyping is correlated with more limited metastatic spread and lower tumor burden, such that biopsy of these patients may be even more challenging. Because invasive biopsy remains an integral part of the diagnostic strategy, methods are needed for maximizing the yield from these biopsy procedures.

There is a current paradox between the need for large amounts of tissue for multiplex analysis of an increasing number of targetable drivers and markers of response to immune therapy (PD-L1, TMB) and the development of minimally invasive biopsy procedures that results in limited specimens. Up to 25% of patients are thus treated without knowledge of the molecular profile of their tumor (4). In particular, 20% of endobronchial ultrasonography transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are rejected from genotyping due to lack of tissue (5) after time and tissue consuming diagnostics steps that are sometimes not required (resistance setting). Circulating tumor DNA is an emerging approach for cancer genotyping but sensitivity is limited to 70-80% (6) by inconsistent tumor shed and low DNA concentrations, so that tissue biopsy is still routine. Also, feasibility of TMB assessment on tissue is only 60% (likely much less on EBUS-TBNA specimens) (7) and approximately 80% in plasma (blood TMB, bTMB) (3).

The presence of cfDNA in several biological fluids and the feasibility of detecting mutations of interest (usually targeting only EGFR) in these fluids (urine, pleural fluid, CSF) have been clearly demonstrated (8-12), while blood is the most widely studied liquid biopsy substrate in advanced NSCLC.

Furthermore, we showed in a proof of concept study, investigating various FNA specimens in a limited numbers of patients that cytology samples' supernatant (usually discarded) is a rich source of DNA. Our results suggest that supernatant free DNA (sfDNA) can be used for baseline and resistance genotyping (13).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Identified mutation

The sensitivity of supernatant to identify the mutations detected on cell block (Gold standard).

Molecular analysis of surnatant

Intervention Type OTHER

The interventional pulmonologist selects the most suspect node. The corresponding TBNA is placed in Cytolyt and tagged using a sticker to indicate the specimen from which supernatant must be saved after the initial spin.

The supernatant is transferred to the "Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Oncologique" where it undergoes a further hard spin. The remaining supernatant is stored at -80°C before to send it to Foundation One for DNA extraction from 3 ml of supernatant and genotyping.

Two 7,5 mL blood tubes are transferred to the laboratory to extract plasma. Plasma was stored at -80°C and then sent to Foundation One for DNA extraction from 2 mL of plasma and genotyping.

10 slides from the cell block are shipped to Foundation One. These specimens are tested by FoundationOne®CDX (tissue), and FoundationOne®Liquid (supernatant and plasma) for genomic and TMB analyses (hybrid-capture based next generation sequencing).

Non identified mutation

The sensitivity of supernatant to identify the mutations detected on cell block (Gold standard).

Molecular analysis of surnatant

Intervention Type OTHER

The interventional pulmonologist selects the most suspect node. The corresponding TBNA is placed in Cytolyt and tagged using a sticker to indicate the specimen from which supernatant must be saved after the initial spin.

The supernatant is transferred to the "Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Oncologique" where it undergoes a further hard spin. The remaining supernatant is stored at -80°C before to send it to Foundation One for DNA extraction from 3 ml of supernatant and genotyping.

Two 7,5 mL blood tubes are transferred to the laboratory to extract plasma. Plasma was stored at -80°C and then sent to Foundation One for DNA extraction from 2 mL of plasma and genotyping.

10 slides from the cell block are shipped to Foundation One. These specimens are tested by FoundationOne®CDX (tissue), and FoundationOne®Liquid (supernatant and plasma) for genomic and TMB analyses (hybrid-capture based next generation sequencing).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Molecular analysis of surnatant

The interventional pulmonologist selects the most suspect node. The corresponding TBNA is placed in Cytolyt and tagged using a sticker to indicate the specimen from which supernatant must be saved after the initial spin.

The supernatant is transferred to the "Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Oncologique" where it undergoes a further hard spin. The remaining supernatant is stored at -80°C before to send it to Foundation One for DNA extraction from 3 ml of supernatant and genotyping.

Two 7,5 mL blood tubes are transferred to the laboratory to extract plasma. Plasma was stored at -80°C and then sent to Foundation One for DNA extraction from 2 mL of plasma and genotyping.

10 slides from the cell block are shipped to Foundation One. These specimens are tested by FoundationOne®CDX (tissue), and FoundationOne®Liquid (supernatant and plasma) for genomic and TMB analyses (hybrid-capture based next generation sequencing).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years-old
* Patients planned for an EBUS-TBNA for

1. Suspicion of stage IV lung cancer (PET+ mediastinal node(s)) (Cohort 1)
2. Stage IV NSCLC with an EGFR, BRAF, HER2, MET mutation or ALK, RET or ROS1 rearranged NSCLC and acquired resistance to targeted therapy (Cohort 2)
* Performance status 0-3
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate
* Patient under legal tutelage
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Toulouse

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolas Guibert

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Toulouse

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nicolas Guibert

Toulouse, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nicolas Guibert, MD

Role: CONTACT

567778160 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nicolas Guibert

Role: primary

5 67 77 81 60 ext. +33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC31/19/0090

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.