A Comparison Between GUMMETAL and SS Orthodontic Wires in Space Closure

NCT ID: NCT04591080

Last Updated: 2025-05-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2022-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When there is space present between our teeth orthodontically we have the ability to close them through many methods. Using braces as our treatment modality this study will be investigating how efficient a new orthodontic wire is in closing tooth space. This new material is trade-named GUMMETAL and claims to have many benefits to treating patients orthodontically. We will be exploring its efficiency in space closure compared to an industry standard (stainless steel). We predict that the stainless-steel orthodontic wire will be more efficient at space closure than the new GUMMETAL wires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a randomized pilot split-mouth clinical trial of patients with spaces ≥ 3mm distal to the maxillary canines in need of closure through sliding mechanics. The sample consists of adolescent patients regardless of Angle's molar malocclusion who are receiving comprehensive full fixed appliance orthodontic treatment. Preformed conjoint archwires half being GUMMETAL and the other half SS, will be utilized. Each patient will have one side of the maxilla randomly allocated into the SS or GUMMETAL treatment group. The study will follow a split-mouth design to reduce the confounding variables from patient to patient on space closure mechanics. The maxillary arch in each subject will be randomized into a SS side or GM side using a random number generator. Spaces will be measured at; T0 is initial records, T1 is initiation of space closure, T2 will be 4 weeks after the initiation of space closure, T3 is another 4 weeks of space closure evaluation and T4 will be the final evaluation of space closure after 4 weeks from T3, via 3D intraoral scans of maxillary arches. Space measurement and calculations will utilize 3Shape software to measure the distance of canine movement based off the distal surface. Sliding mechanics will be activated through NiTi coil springs from the maxillary canines to the maxillary molars. The force will be standardized to 150 gms and will be measured each visit. The same provider will activate the NiTi coil spring for retraction, along with data collection. Superimposition of scans will be utilized to assess outcome measures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malocclusion, Angle Class I

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Split mouth design where one side of the mouth will be receiving the intervention and the other side of the mouth the control treatment.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The participants will not know which intervention is on which side of their mouth, but will know that they are getting both types of interventions simultaneously, given the split-mouth design of the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GUMMETAL TiNbTaZr

TiNbTaZr (Beta-Titanium) Alloy used to manufacture orthodontic archwires. We will be using an archwire with the size of 0.016 x 0.022"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GUMMETAL Orthodontic Wire

Intervention Type DEVICE

Orthodontic archwire made of TiNbTaZr alloy.

Stainless Steel (CrNi)

Stainless steel (18% Chromium and 8% Nickel) used as the control, and linked anteriorly to the GUMMETAL counterpart. Size of archwire is 0.016 x 0.022"

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Stainless Steel (CrNi)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Stainless steel (18% Chromium and 8% Nickel) used as the control, and linked anteriorly to the GUMMETAL counterpart. Size of archwire is 0.016 x 0.022"

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GUMMETAL Orthodontic Wire

Orthodontic archwire made of TiNbTaZr alloy.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Stainless Steel (CrNi)

Stainless steel (18% Chromium and 8% Nickel) used as the control, and linked anteriorly to the GUMMETAL counterpart. Size of archwire is 0.016 x 0.022"

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TiNbTaZr, Titanium-niobium, Beta-titanium,

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Full permanent dentition (except third molars)
* Good general and oral health
* Bilateral spaces 3 \>/= mm distal to the maxillary canines
* Normal and hypodivergent growth pattern
* Any dental malocclusion
* Good Oral Hygiene

Exclusion Criteria

* Systemic diseases or syndrome
* Abnormalities in teeth size and/or shape
* Previous orthodontic treatment
* Anti-inflammatory medication
* Craniofacial anomalies
* Hyperdivergent growth pattern
* Periodontal disease / attachment loss exceeding 25% of root length
* Significant pre or in-treatment root resorption
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

State University of New York at Buffalo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lubomyr Ravlyk

Orthodontic Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thikriat Al-Jewair

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University at Buffalo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University at Buffalo

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GMTSS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Retentive Teeth
NCT05727670 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA