Impact of Continuous Regional Analgesia in Severe Trauma Patients

NCT ID: NCT04546503

Last Updated: 2020-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-01

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Regional analgesia, based on its physiological effects and efficacy, is used for optimal perioperative pain relief. However, for acute pain in multiple trauma patients in a critical condition, it has not been prospectively studied. The use of regional anaesthesia in this group of patients extend to the management of trauma patients and of other painful procedures performed at the patient's bed. The use of RA in such patients must be analyzed in the light of associated conditions that can increase the risk of systemic toxicity and complications: coagulopathies, infection, immunosuppressive states, sedation and problems associated with mechanical ventilation. The investigators aim to assess the role of continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) in multiple trauma patients, in order to show the benefits in terms of opiates consumption decrease, sedation limitation, improvement in ventilator free days and patients outcome

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Inclusion of multiple trauma patients with limb fractures and need for sedation and prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Patients should meet the following criterias: pressure of cerebral perfusion\>60mmHg, normothermia, PaCO2 35-40 mmHg, pH\> 7.20, Normal coagulation parameters, Hb\> 8g / dl (without head trauma) or Hb\> 10g / dl (if associated head trauma).

Randomization in two patients groups: "RA group" versus "NoRA Group

Methods:

group without locoregional anesthesia: Sedation using midazolam and sufentanil: Multi-Daily adjustment of doses every 4 hours using Behavioral Pain Scale score \<4 and Ramsay Score \> 4.

group with locoregional anesthesia: Sedation using midazolam and sufentanil: Multi-Daily adjustment of doses every 4 hours using Behavioral Pain Scale score \<4 and Ramsay Score \> 4 + peronerval block catheter from 0 to 24h after admission in intensive care unit using ropivacaine 0.2% with a continuous infusion at 1mL/10 Kg /H Follow-up up to 5 days for the 2 group. The main objective: sufentanil consumption (reported in µg / kg / d) for the same levels of Behavioral Pain Scale and Ramsay Scales values.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Limb Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Aseptic placement of one or two tunnelized CPNB at the level of the nerves or plexus of the traumatized limb (s), Nervestimulation and ultrasound guidance by trained operator.

Continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 1mL/10 Kg /H

group with locoregional anesthesia: Sedation using midazolam and sufentanil: Multi-Daily adjustment of doses every 4 hours using Behavioral Pain Scale score \<4 and Ramsay Score \> 4 + peronerval block catheter from 0 to 24h after admission in intensive care unit using ropivacaine 0.2% with a continuous infusion at 1mL/10 Kg /H
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
The investigator responsible for assessing sedation and adjusting dosages hypnotic and morphinic (according to objectives) will not be aware of the result of the randomization.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuous Regional Analgesia group

Sedation using midazolam and sufentanil: Multi-Daily adjustment of doses every 4 hours using Behavioral Pain Scale score \<4 and Ramsay Score \> 4 + perinerval block catheter from 0 to 24h after admission in intensive care unit using ropivacaine 0.2% with a continuous infusion at 1mL/10 Kg /H

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control Group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

General anaesthesia without regional analgesia

Control Group

group with general anesthesia and without locoregional anesthesia: Sedation using midazolam and sufentanil: Multi-Daily adjustment of doses every 4 hours using Behavioral Pain Scale score \<4 and Ramsay Score \> 4

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous Regional analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Aseptic placement of one or two tunnelized CPNB at the level of the nerves or plexus of the traumatized limb (s), Nervestimulation and ultrasound guidance by trained operator.

Continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 1mL/10 Kg /H

\+ General anaesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuous Regional analgesia

Aseptic placement of one or two tunnelized CPNB at the level of the nerves or plexus of the traumatized limb (s), Nervestimulation and ultrasound guidance by trained operator.

Continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 1mL/10 Kg /H

\+ General anaesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Control Group

General anaesthesia without regional analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient older than 18 years
* Multiple trauma Patient ( with or without head trauma)
* Patient admitted to ICU
* Patient with limb fracture (s)
* Patient requiring sedation and mechanical ventilation for more than 48h
* Patient affiliated to a social security system
* Patient whose informed consent was obtained from the family

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient currently enrolled in another trial
* Patient with coagulation disorders
* Patient whose access to the puncture sites is not feasible (underlying lesions)
* Patient with allergies to local anesthetics (LA)
* Patient whose family did not give informed consent
* Patient younger than 15 years and 3 months
* Tetraplegic Patient
* Dying patients
* Patients with more than 3 different fracture sites
Minimum Eligible Age

183 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oriane MARTINEZ, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesia Resuscitation at the Hospital Lapeyronie

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University hospital

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-A00443-36

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

8822

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.