Continuous Femoral Nerve Block With a Tibial Plateau Fracture
NCT ID: NCT02168959
Last Updated: 2016-03-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-02-28
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in pain scores or total opioid consumption between patients receiving a femoral nerve block and those without a nerve block following surgical repair of a tibial plateau fracture.
A secondary outcome will examine long-term pain control, range of motion, and functional status of these patients at their regular orthopedic clinic follow-up appointments. The same pain scores will be assessed, along with quadriceps strength and knee range of motion. Patients will complete the PROMIS Physical Function CAT and short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment, patient reported outcomes tools to evalute physical function.
A teriary outcome will be to retrospectively examine postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption for all tibial plateau fracture patients seen at the University of Utah for surgical repair in the past 10 years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Genicular Nerve Block After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Tibial Plateau
NCT06639503
Popliteal Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Ankle and Hindfoot Reconstruction
NCT02440542
Obturator and Femoral Nerve Block in Patients With Hip Fracture
NCT02540837
Saphenous Nerve Block After Tibial Plateau ORIF
NCT04314570
Effectiveness of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Versus Single Shot Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Control
NCT01916590
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Femoral nerve block
bupivacaine
bupivacaine
This drug is standard of care. The point of the study is to see if this method will yield better pain scores and improved patient satisfaction vs. non-nerve block. Simply: prospective observation of two standard methods.
No femoral nerve block
No block
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bupivacaine
This drug is standard of care. The point of the study is to see if this method will yield better pain scores and improved patient satisfaction vs. non-nerve block. Simply: prospective observation of two standard methods.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male and female patients, aged 18 years or older, who have underwent surgery performed by Dr. Kubiak or Dr. Higgins at University Hospital for repair of a tibial plateau fracture will be considered for inclusion in the retrospective study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who do not speak English
* Patients who are unable to effectively communicate with their treatment team (example: mechanically ventilated patients and mentally handicapped patients)
* Patients less than 18 years old
* Patients with ongoing compartment syndrome
* Patients with an allergy or intolerance to bupivacaine
* Patients with other significant associated traumatic injuries that would be expected to delay their overall recovery (example: a patient who sustains a motor vehicle accident and fractures their tibia but also sustains massive intra-abdominal injury with serious damage to their liver and other vital organs)
* Patients with ipsilateral femoral fractures
Retrospective:
* Patients less than 18 years of age
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eric Kubiak
M.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Erik Kubiak
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthopedic Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
56481
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.