Preoperative Continuous Sciatic Perineural Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Revascularization
NCT ID: NCT04286971
Last Updated: 2020-05-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
15 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-02-19
2020-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block vs Epidural Analgesia in Lower Limb Amputation for Postoperative Pain
NCT05608733
Femoral/Sciatic Block for Knee Surgery
NCT02882152
Ischemic Pain Control With Analgesic Methods Clinical Trial
NCT02841488
A Comparison Of Block Quality In Anterior And Posterior Approach To Sciatic Nerve Block
NCT03607292
Approach to Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block for Orthopedic Procedures in Day Surgery With Two Different Techniques
NCT02029404
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective of the present study is to describe a series of cases where the technique was applied in order to relieve the pain of these patients, following the Pain Score Numerical rating as a reference. Secondary objectives will be to describe difficulties associated with the technique and possible associated adverse factors.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* lower limb angioplasty
* peripheral arterial disease;
* between 2017 and 2018 years;
* correct filling of numerical rating pain evaluation in the medical record
Exclusion Criteria
* peripheral block at another concomitant site (other than the popliteal);
* No adequate record of the care received in the medical record
* if medical record is not available during the data collection period
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rafael Mercante Linhares
Head of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rafael M Linhares
Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Luiten WE, Schepers T, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Hermanides J, Stevens MF, Hollmann MW, van Samkar G. Comparison of continuous nerve block versus patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain and outcome after talar and calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Nov;35(11):1116-21. doi: 10.1177/1071100714546640. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
Thomas K, Barrett B, Tupper R, Dacenko-Grawe L, Holm K. Pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a case-control study of continuous nerve block therapy. Orthop Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;33(5):268-76. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0b013e3182879bd9.
Gelfand HJ, Ouanes JP, Lesley MR, Ko PS, Murphy JD, Sumida SM, Isaac GR, Kumar K, Wu CL. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2011 Mar;23(2):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.12.005.
Compere V, Cornet C, Fourdrinier V, Maitre AM, Duparc F, Biga N, Dureuil B. [Evaluation of continuous nerve block for postoperative pain management in orthopaedic surgery]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2005 Jul;24(7):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2005.04.025. French.
Aubuchon A, Arnold WD, Bracewell A, Hoyle JC. Sciatic neuropathy due to popliteal fossa nerve block. Muscle Nerve. 2017 Oct;56(4):822-824. doi: 10.1002/mus.25622. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
Dingemans SA, de Ruiter KJ, Birnie MFN, Goslings JC, van Samkar G, Schepers T. Comparable Postoperative Pain Levels Using 2 Different Nerve Blocks in the Operative Treatment of Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Dec;38(12):1352-1356. doi: 10.1177/1071100717730337. Epub 2017 Sep 16.
Kim NY, Lee KY, Bai SJ, Hong JH, Lee J, Park JM, Kim SH. Comparison of the effects of remifentanil-based general anesthesia and popliteal nerve block on postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in diabetic patients undergoing distal foot amputation: A retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(29):e4302. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004302.
Dao T, Amaro-Driedger D, Mehta J. Successful treatment of Raynaud's syndrome in a lupus patient with continuous bilateral popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a case report. Local Reg Anesth. 2016 Jun 15;9:35-7. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S97111. eCollection 2016.
Joshi G, Gandhi K, Shah N, Gadsden J, Corman SL. Peripheral nerve blocks in the management of postoperative pain: challenges and opportunities. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:524-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.041. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25206319.3.0000.5279
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.