Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block vs Epidural Analgesia in Lower Limb Amputation for Postoperative Pain
NCT ID: NCT05608733
Last Updated: 2022-11-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
112 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-31
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pre-emptive Sciatic Bloc to Prevent Lower Limb Phantom Pain
NCT00528463
A Comparison Of Block Quality In Anterior And Posterior Approach To Sciatic Nerve Block
NCT03607292
Preoperative Continuous Sciatic Perineural Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Revascularization
NCT04286971
Continuous Sciatic Block Nerve in the Management of Vascular Pain in Critical Ischemia of Lower Limbs Patients
NCT04278014
Epidural Catheter With or Without Adductor Canal Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02121392
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Epidural catheter
Epidural catheter infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% (4-6 cc/h) at level L3-L4
Epidural catheter
Bony landmarks and the space between the lower lumbar vertebrae are identified. Subsequently, infiltration of the skin and subcutaneous cellular tissue with local anesthetic (Lidocaine 2% without epinephrine) is performed at the site to be punctured. A 17G Tuohy needle is inserted 2-4 cm through the skin, then the mandrel is removed, the low-resistance syringe is connected, and the loss of resistance is checked using the air or liquid technique, depending on the preference of the anesthesiologist. . Appreciating the loss of resistance in the embolus, the mandrel is then withdrawn and the epidural catheter is advanced to leave it an additional 5 cm inside the epidural space.
Continuous sciatic nerve block
Continuous sciatic catheter infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% (6-10 cc/h)
Continuous sciatic nerve block
The patient is placed in the prone or supine position with the limb to be blocked flexed at 90°. Using a high-frequency linear transducer and using sterile technique, the popliteal sciatic nerve is identified in an axial axis. A 17G Tuohy needle is inserted plane and medial. Saline solution (5 ml) is applied to open the perineural space. Adequate hydrodissection and donut sign in the nerve are observed..A perineural catheter is then advanced 5 cm beyond the tip of the needle. The catheter is fixed with stitches and a transparent sterile dressing is placed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epidural catheter
Bony landmarks and the space between the lower lumbar vertebrae are identified. Subsequently, infiltration of the skin and subcutaneous cellular tissue with local anesthetic (Lidocaine 2% without epinephrine) is performed at the site to be punctured. A 17G Tuohy needle is inserted 2-4 cm through the skin, then the mandrel is removed, the low-resistance syringe is connected, and the loss of resistance is checked using the air or liquid technique, depending on the preference of the anesthesiologist. . Appreciating the loss of resistance in the embolus, the mandrel is then withdrawn and the epidural catheter is advanced to leave it an additional 5 cm inside the epidural space.
Continuous sciatic nerve block
The patient is placed in the prone or supine position with the limb to be blocked flexed at 90°. Using a high-frequency linear transducer and using sterile technique, the popliteal sciatic nerve is identified in an axial axis. A 17G Tuohy needle is inserted plane and medial. Saline solution (5 ml) is applied to open the perineural space. Adequate hydrodissection and donut sign in the nerve are observed..A perineural catheter is then advanced 5 cm beyond the tip of the needle. The catheter is fixed with stitches and a transparent sterile dressing is placed.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Being scheduled for above or below knee amputation or for bone remodeling of lower limb amputees
3. Acceptance of continuous regional analgesic technique as part of their multimodal analgesia
Exclusion Criteria
2. Allergy to local anesthetics
3. Contraindication for epidural technique or continuous blocks
4. Stage 5 kidney disease
5. Concomitant use of aspirin and clopidogrel
6. Pregnancy status
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad de Antioquia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mario Zamudio, Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
IPS universitaria
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Antioquia´s University
Medellín, , Colombia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Edgley C, Hogg M, De Silva A, Braat S, Bucknill A, Leslie K. Severe acute pain and persistent post-surgical pain in orthopaedic trauma patients: a cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;123(3):350-359. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.05.030. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
De Jong R, Shysh AJ. Development of a Multimodal Analgesia Protocol for Perioperative Acute Pain Management for Lower Limb Amputation. Pain Res Manag. 2018 Jun 3;2018:5237040. doi: 10.1155/2018/5237040. eCollection 2018.
Gehling M, Tryba M. [Prophylaxis of phantom pain: is regional analgesia ineffective?]. Schmerz. 2003 Jan;17(1):11-9. doi: 10.1007/s00482-002-0198-2. German.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IN-47-2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.