Sciatic Nerve Blocks With or Without Femoral Block Versus Spinal Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Diabetic Foot Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02727348

Last Updated: 2016-04-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

Dysautonomia refers to the abnormal function of the autonomic nervous system including sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system. Diabetes mellitus causes secondary dysautonomias (1). The Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) is a simple and validated tool to assess the presence and severity of autonomic symptoms (2).

Diabetic patients also suffer from chronic neuropathic pain. After amputation surgeries, up to 78% of these patients may develop post surgical neuropathic pain (3). The self-report version of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scale (S-LANSS) is validated as a diagnostic tool to assess patients with neuropathic pain (4). This scale will be used to assess if there is any changes in the pain experienced after diabetic foot surgery.

Currently, both spinal anaesthesia (SAB) and ultrasound guided femoral and sciatic peripheral nerve blocks (FSNB) are acceptable anaesthesia for dysautonomic diabetic patients with diabetic foot ulcer going for wound debridement, Ray's amputation and below knee amputation (5)

Many studies have compared multiple perioperative parameters of patients undergoing lower limb surgery under peripheral nerve blocks versus spinal anaesthesia. These parameters include preparation time, anaesthetic complications (e.g. hypotension, nausea and vomiting, post-dural puncture headache, urinary retention), patient satisfaction and postoperative pain control (6,7,8).

The investigators want to study if patients with dysautonomia have a different haemodynamic response to spinal anaesthesia or peripheral nerve blockade changes compared to patients with normal autonomic function.

Secondarily, the investigators would also study if there is a difference in post operative pain control as well as incidence in chronic pain in patients who receive spinal anaesthesia versus peripheral nerve blockade.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dysautonomia refers to the abnormal function of the autonomic nervous system including sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system. Diabetes mellitus causes secondary dysautonomias (1). The Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) is a simple and validated tool to assess the presence and severity of autonomic symptoms (2).

Diabetic patients also suffer from chronic neuropathic pain. After amputation surgeries, up to 78% of these patients may develop post surgical neuropathic pain (3). The self-report version of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scale (S-LANSS) is validated as a diagnostic tool to assess patients with neuropathic pain (4). This scale will be used to assess if there is any changes in the pain experienced after diabetic foot surgery.

Currently, both spinal anaesthesia (SAB) and ultrasound guided femoral and/or sciatic peripheral nerve blocks (FSNB) are acceptable anaesthesia for dysautonomic diabetic patients with diabetic foot ulcer going for wound debridement, Ray's amputation and below knee amputation (5)

Many studies have compared multiple perioperative parameters of patients undergoing lower limb surgery under peripheral nerve blocks versus spinal anaesthesia. These parameters include preparation time, anaesthetic complications (e.g. hypotension, nausea and vomiting, post-dural puncture headache, urinary retention), patient satisfaction and postoperative pain control (6,7,8).

The investigators want to study if patients with dysautonomia have a different haemodynamic response to spinal anaesthesia or peripheral nerve blockade changes compared to patients with normal autonomic function.

Secondarily, the investigators would also study if there is a difference in post operative pain control as well as incidence in chronic pain in patients who receive spinal anaesthesia versus peripheral nerve blockade.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Foot

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sciatic block with or without femoral block

Sciatic block with or without femoral block performed on the patient with 3mg/kg of ropivacaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sciatic with or without femoral block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sciatic with or without femoral block performed either with ultrasound and/or nerve stimulator on the patient with 3mg/kg of ropivacaine

Spinal anaesthesia

Spinal anaesthesia will be performed on the patient with heavy marcaine 0.5% up to 3mls

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Spinal anaesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal anaesthesia with up to 3mls of 0.5% bupivacaine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sciatic with or without femoral block

Sciatic with or without femoral block performed either with ultrasound and/or nerve stimulator on the patient with 3mg/kg of ropivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal anaesthesia

Spinal anaesthesia with up to 3mls of 0.5% bupivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diabetic patients with diabetic foot ulcer undergoing diabetic foot surgery below the knee

Exclusion Criteria

* Refuse spinal or regional anaesthesia
* Uncooperative patients
* Patients with contraindication for FSNB or SAB
* Patients with known allergy to local anaesthetics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Malaya

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chew Yin Wang, MBChB

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Malaya

Hou Yee Lai, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Malaya

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Malaya Medical Centre

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Malaysia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lai HY, Foo LL, Lim SM, Yong CF, Loh PS, Chaw SH, Hasan MS, Wang CY. The hemodynamic and pain impact of peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in diabetic patients undergoing diabetic foot surgery. Clin Auton Res. 2020 Feb;30(1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s10286-017-0485-8. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29196938 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201401-0658

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pre-post Spinal Popliteal Block
NCT05354791 TERMINATED