Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
71 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-02-28
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: After obtaining ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 71 patients were enrolled to the study. Diabetic patients were included in Group DM and non-diabetics were included in Group NODM. All received ultrasound-guided ABPBs with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%. Our primary outcome was sensory block duration, and secondary outcomes were sensory and motor block onset times, motor block duration, time-to-first-pain (numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥4), postoperative NRS scores and rescue analgesic consumption (NRS) ≥4) through the postoperative first 2 days. All outcomes were assessed by a blinded investigators.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Infraclavicular Block Properties in Diabetic Patients
NCT03486535
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Brachial Plexus Blocks and Selective Distal Blocks in Terms of Anesthesia
NCT05656625
The Simultaneous Use of Supraclavicular and Distal Blocks
NCT01989312
Comparison of Selective Trunk and Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks
NCT06004648
Evaluation of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks At Various Volumes: Impact on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter
NCT06428461
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: After obtaining ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 71 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III and aged between 40 and 75 years were enrolled to the study. Diabetic patients were included in Group DM and non-diabetics were included in Group NODM. All received ultrasound-guided ABPBs with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%. Postoperatively, patients were administered paracetamol as rescue analgesics, if numeric rating scale (NRS) was ≥4. Our primary outcome was sensory block duration, and secondary outcomes were sensory and motor block onset times, motor block duration, time-to-first-pain (numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥4), postoperative NRS scores, and rescue analgesic consumption (NRS) ≥4) through the postoperative first 2 days. All outcomes were assessed by a blinded investigators.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Diabetic patients
Patients received ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks (ABPBs) with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%.
Axillary Brachial Plexus Blocks
All patients received ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block (ABPBs) with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%.
Non-diabetic patients
Patients received ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks (ABPBs) with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%.
Axillary Brachial Plexus Blocks
All patients received ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block (ABPBs) with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Axillary Brachial Plexus Blocks
All patients received ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block (ABPBs) with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
40 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Emine Aysu Salviz, MD
M.D., Attending Anesthesiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emine A Salviz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Design and conduct the study, review and analyze the data, and write the manuscript
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul University, Department of Anesthesiology
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gebhard RE, Nielsen KC, Pietrobon R, Missair A, Williams BA. Diabetes mellitus, independent of body mass index, is associated with a "higher success" rate for supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):404-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ada58d.
Sertoz N, Deniz MN, Ayanoglu HO. Relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin level and sciatic nerve block performance in diabetic patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):85-90. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460366.
Cuvillon P, Reubrecht V, Zoric L, Lemoine L, Belin M, Ducombs O, Birenbaum A, Riou B, Langeron O. Comparison of subgluteal sciatic nerve block duration in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013 May;110(5):823-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes496. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014/1869
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.