Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
21 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-01
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound-Guided PENG Block vs Femoral Nerve Block for Analgesia Before Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Surgery
NCT06989047
Lateral Cutaneous Nerve and PENG Blocks Versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block in Post-op Analgesia of Hip Fractures
NCT05749367
PENG Block vs FNB + ONB in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery With Contraindications to Neuraxial Anesthesia
NCT06457880
Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Geriatric Patients With Hip Fractures
NCT05941221
PENG-block Versus FIB-block in Emergency Room
NCT04278807
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PENG Block
Patients will be submitted to PENG block intervention guiding by ultrasound.
PENG Block
Patient will be placed in the supine position and the ultrasound probe will be placed in the transverse plane over the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise by approximately 45 degrees. A 22-gauge, 100 mm needle will be inserted using the plane approach from lateral to medial, between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following a negative aspiration, 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine will be injected. The needle position will be confirmed by visualizing the separation of layers with the dispersion of the injected volume.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PENG Block
Patient will be placed in the supine position and the ultrasound probe will be placed in the transverse plane over the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise by approximately 45 degrees. A 22-gauge, 100 mm needle will be inserted using the plane approach from lateral to medial, between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following a negative aspiration, 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine will be injected. The needle position will be confirmed by visualizing the separation of layers with the dispersion of the injected volume.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* aged 18-105 years
* with the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I, II, or III.
Exclusion Criteria
* history of mental disorders
* presence of chronic pain as assessed using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire
18 Years
105 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Sirio-Libanes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Sírio-Libanês
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Giron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.
Membership of the Working Party; Griffiths R, Alper J, Beckingsale A, Goldhill D, Heyburn G, Holloway J, Leaper E, Parker M, Ridgway S, White S, Wiese M, Wilson I. Management of proximal femoral fractures 2011: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jan;67(1):85-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06957.x.
Guay J, Kopp S. Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 25;11(11):CD001159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3.
Hua H, Xu Y, Jiang M, Dai X. Evaluation of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Analgesic Effect in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty. J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 9;2022:7452716. doi: 10.1155/2022/7452716. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
48721715.0.0000.5461
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.