Analgesic Non Inferiority of the Thoracic Bi-block in Comparison With Thoracic Epidural for VATS.

NCT ID: NCT04538235

Last Updated: 2020-09-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-20

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Video-Assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is the standard treatment for localized lung cancer. However, there is no consensus on analgesic management in patients undergoing VATS.

The aim of the study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of thoracic epidural with that a "Bi-block" combining an Erector Spinae muscle plane Block (ESP) and a Serratus Anterior Block (SAP) in patients undergoing VATS for lung or pleural surgery.

Our main hypothesis is that the analgesic efficacy of the Bi-block, assessed by morphine consumption, is not inferior to that provided by a thoracic epidural during the first 48 hours after VATS. We conducted a age, gender and type of surgery-matched retrospective cohort study in the Department of Thoracic Anesthesia of the Montpellier University Hospital (France).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Erector Spinae Muscle Plane Block Serratus Anterior Muscle Plane Block Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lung Cancer Pleural Diseases Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bi-block (Serratus and erector spinae block) group

The Bi-block consisted in performing an ESP block followed by a SAP block on the side ipsilateral to the thoracic surgery. For the ESP block, 40 ml of Ropivacaine 2mg/ml were injected under the erector spinae muscle plane, at the level of the 4th thoracic vertebra. For the SAP block, 40 ml of Ropivacaine 2 mg/ml were injected under the serratus anterior muscle plane. The cumulative dose of Ropivacaine did not exceed 3 mg/kg.

Regional anesthesia was performed before surgery.

Thoracic Regional Analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the TEA group, a thoracic epidural was performed before VATS. In the Bi-block group, a SAP block associated with an ESP block were performed before surgical incision under general anesthesia.

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) group

The thoracic epidural was performed according to a standardized protocol, with a Tuohy needle via the median puncture technique, at the level of T4-T5 intervertebral space. After a test dose of 2 to 3 ml of Lidocaine, 5 to 10 ml of a mixture of Ropivacaine 2 mg/ml and Sufentanil 0.5 µg / mL were injected. Epidural continuous administration was performed with the same mixture of anesthetic connected to a CADD Solis ™ pump set according to a PCEA protocol adapted to the patient's weight (continuous flow rate from 3 to 6 ml/h, self-administered bolus dose from 3 to 5 ml, refractory period 30 min).

Regional anesthesia was performed before surgery.

Thoracic Regional Analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the TEA group, a thoracic epidural was performed before VATS. In the Bi-block group, a SAP block associated with an ESP block were performed before surgical incision under general anesthesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Thoracic Regional Analgesia

In the TEA group, a thoracic epidural was performed before VATS. In the Bi-block group, a SAP block associated with an ESP block were performed before surgical incision under general anesthesia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Bi-block, a regional anesthesia technique combining a serratus anterior block with an erector spinae block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* To be over 18.
* To be scheduled for VATS in the center of the study during the study period.
* Thoracic Epidural analgesia of Bi-block analgesia.

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic pain or opioid use before surgery (6 months).
* Postoperative hospitalization in ICU during the first two days.
* Postoperative surgical complication needing surgical revision during the first two days.
* Preoperative dementia or other psychiatric disease incompatible with VAS pain scoring.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierre Sentenac, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montpellier University Hospital

Pascal H Colson, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Montpellier University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Intensive Care Unit, D - University hospital of Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL19_0473

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.