Evaluation of the Effect of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Airway by Acoustic Rhinometry
NCT ID: NCT04529057
Last Updated: 2020-08-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-01
2017-05-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Effects of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT04604392
Polygraphic Evaluation of the Effects of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Sleep Quality
NCT04529213
Tooth-Borne Versus Tooth-Bone-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expanders: A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation of Soft Tissues
NCT04828213
Analysis of the Dentoskeletal Effects of the Expander With Differential Opening
NCT02810353
Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments During Rapid and Slow Maxillary Expansion
NCT04734054
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: Fourty-six 12- to 14-years-old patients with narrow maxilla were randomly allocated into 3 study groups according to the type of RME appliance: tooth-borne, tooth tissue-borne and bone-borne. Participants were recruited from the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Turkey. During the RME treatment, the same protocol was applied to all patients and the expansion screws were activated twice a day (0.4 mm/day). Computer-generated randomization was used with group allocation concealed using opaque, sealed envelopes. The outcome assessor was blinded; however, it was not feasible to blind either operator or patients. The primary outcome of this study was the correction of posterior crossbite. Secondary outcomes included AR assessment of nasal airway dimensions as nasal volume, the minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) 1 and 2. AR measurements were obtained before treatment (T0), after active expansion (T1), and at 3 months-follow-up (T2). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a Bonferroni test was used for inter-group comparison and two-way ANOVA was used for intra-group evalaution.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tooth-borne (Hyrax) expander
Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment
The patients were treated with KBME, Hyrax and MIDME maxillary expansion appliances, respectively. All expansion appliances containing a Hyrax expansion screw positioned parallel to the second premolars and were used to correct the posterior crossbite. In the MIDME group, two mini-screws with a diameter of 1.6 mm and a length of 10 mm are located on the right and left sides between the roots of the 2nd premolar and 1st molar teeth with 60-70° angle. KBME and Hyrax expansion appliances were cemented with glass ionomer cement and MIDME was cemented with using the light-cured composite. Same protocol was applied to all patients during RME treatment. Expansion screws in all groups were activated by two turns a day.
Tooth tissue-borne (KBME) expander
Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment
The patients were treated with KBME, Hyrax and MIDME maxillary expansion appliances, respectively. All expansion appliances containing a Hyrax expansion screw positioned parallel to the second premolars and were used to correct the posterior crossbite. In the MIDME group, two mini-screws with a diameter of 1.6 mm and a length of 10 mm are located on the right and left sides between the roots of the 2nd premolar and 1st molar teeth with 60-70° angle. KBME and Hyrax expansion appliances were cemented with glass ionomer cement and MIDME was cemented with using the light-cured composite. Same protocol was applied to all patients during RME treatment. Expansion screws in all groups were activated by two turns a day.
Bone-borne (MIDME) expander
Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment
The patients were treated with KBME, Hyrax and MIDME maxillary expansion appliances, respectively. All expansion appliances containing a Hyrax expansion screw positioned parallel to the second premolars and were used to correct the posterior crossbite. In the MIDME group, two mini-screws with a diameter of 1.6 mm and a length of 10 mm are located on the right and left sides between the roots of the 2nd premolar and 1st molar teeth with 60-70° angle. KBME and Hyrax expansion appliances were cemented with glass ionomer cement and MIDME was cemented with using the light-cured composite. Same protocol was applied to all patients during RME treatment. Expansion screws in all groups were activated by two turns a day.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment
The patients were treated with KBME, Hyrax and MIDME maxillary expansion appliances, respectively. All expansion appliances containing a Hyrax expansion screw positioned parallel to the second premolars and were used to correct the posterior crossbite. In the MIDME group, two mini-screws with a diameter of 1.6 mm and a length of 10 mm are located on the right and left sides between the roots of the 2nd premolar and 1st molar teeth with 60-70° angle. KBME and Hyrax expansion appliances were cemented with glass ionomer cement and MIDME was cemented with using the light-cured composite. Same protocol was applied to all patients during RME treatment. Expansion screws in all groups were activated by two turns a day.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Bilateral crossbite and need for RME,
3. maxillary and mandibular permanent teeth fully erupted,
4. willingness to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
2. having nasal/nasopharyngeal /oropharyngeal pathologies, craniofacial syndromes, systemic disease, poor oral hygiene,
3. history of previous orthodontic treatment.
12 Years
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Izmir Katip Celebi University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gökçenur Gökçe
Assistant professor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gokce G, Gode S, Ozturk A, Kirazli T, Veli I. Evaluation of the effects of different rapid maxillary expansion appliances on airway by acoustic rhinometry: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;155:111074. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111074. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TDR-SABE-0024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.