Efficacy of Mini-implant Assisted Maxillary Expansion in Adolescents and Adults
NCT ID: NCT06449014
Last Updated: 2025-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-02
2027-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MARPE Effect With/Without MOP in Non-growing Patients
NCT06502041
Evaluation of Maxillary Expansion Methods on Nasomaxillary Structures
NCT07326345
Immediate Skeletal and Dento-alveolar Effects of Two and Four Mini-screw Supported Hyrax for Maxillary Expansion in Non-growing Patients
NCT06851728
Comparison of Two Miniscrew Anchored Maxillary Protraction Protocols
NCT03712007
Upper Airway's Pressure Drop Analyses After Mandibular Advancement and Maxillary Expansion
NCT04190953
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Continuous rapid activation protocol: Patients received one activation of 0.17 mm per day until reaching the clinical goal.
2. Continuous slow activation protocol: Patients underwent two activations (0.33 mm) per day for the first 7 days, followed by one turn forward every third day (0.17 mm / 3 days).
3. Force-controlled polycyclic protocol: Patients underwent two activations (0.33 mm) per day for the first 7 days. Then, the hex nut was turned 6 sides backward, followed by 6 sides forward after 15 minutes. Additionally, the device was activated by 0.17 mm every third day.
Intervention:
All patients underwent maxillary expansion with MARPE. Four orthodontic mini-screws were inserted under local anesthesia using a surgical guide and motor. Surgical incision was not required, and predrilling was performed if necessary. The MARPE remained in place for 12 months after expansion to allow bone remodeling in the midpalatal suture. Fixed straight-wire treatment commenced 2 months after expansion termination. Patients underwent retention check-ups at 6 and 12 months post-expansion, and expansion screws and mini-screws were removed after 12 months or before orthognathic surgery, if applicable.
The specific aims of the study were to evaluate the success rate of nonsurgical maxillary expansion, compare the efficacy of the three activation protocols, assess and compare complications, analyze the correlation between success rate and Midpalatal Suture Maturation Stage (MPS), age, and sex, and measure nasal permeability variation using anterior rhinomanometry.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CRAP
Continuous Rapid Activation Protocol: 1 activation of the expansion screw per day which is equal to 0,17 mm expansion of the maxilla per day till reaching the clinical goal
Mini-implants assisted maxillary expansion
The intervention involved the placement of orthodontic mini-screws in the patient's palate, varying in diameter from 2 to 2.3 mm and in length from 11 to 15 mm. After mini-screw insertion, another intraoral scan was taken for the fabrication of the appliance. Approximately three weeks later, the expander was placed in the patient's palate, and maxillary expansion was initiated immediately afterward according to the chosen protocol.
SCAP
Continuous Slow Activation Protocol: 2 activations of the expansion screw which is equal to 0,33 mm expansion of the maxilla per day during the first 7 days. After that first week, then each third day 1 activation (0,17 mm / 3 days).
Mini-implants assisted maxillary expansion
The intervention involved the placement of orthodontic mini-screws in the patient's palate, varying in diameter from 2 to 2.3 mm and in length from 11 to 15 mm. After mini-screw insertion, another intraoral scan was taken for the fabrication of the appliance. Approximately three weeks later, the expander was placed in the patient's palate, and maxillary expansion was initiated immediately afterward according to the chosen protocol.
FCPC
force-controlled polycyclic protocol: 2 activations of the expansion screw which is equal to 0,33 mm expansion of the maxilla per day during the first 7 days. Then the expansion screw will be turned 6 sides backward, and after 15 min, the expansion screw will be turned forward 6 sides again. And every third day, the device will be additionally activated by 0.17mm (0,17 mm / 3 days)
Mini-implants assisted maxillary expansion
The intervention involved the placement of orthodontic mini-screws in the patient's palate, varying in diameter from 2 to 2.3 mm and in length from 11 to 15 mm. After mini-screw insertion, another intraoral scan was taken for the fabrication of the appliance. Approximately three weeks later, the expander was placed in the patient's palate, and maxillary expansion was initiated immediately afterward according to the chosen protocol.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mini-implants assisted maxillary expansion
The intervention involved the placement of orthodontic mini-screws in the patient's palate, varying in diameter from 2 to 2.3 mm and in length from 11 to 15 mm. After mini-screw insertion, another intraoral scan was taken for the fabrication of the appliance. Approximately three weeks later, the expander was placed in the patient's palate, and maxillary expansion was initiated immediately afterward according to the chosen protocol.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* who presented with transverse maxillary discrepancy (unilateral, bilateral, anticipated, or constriction without crossbite).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who had previously palatal expansion were excluded also.
* Presence of anatomic or pathological obstacle of the palatal mini-screw insertion (impacted tooth, tumor.)
* refusal of study participation
16 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasme University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Route de Lennik 900
Anderlecht, Brussels Capital, Belgium
service dentaire et d'orthodontie de l'hopital université de bruxelles (HUB)
Anderlecht, Brussels Capital, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Erasme_MARPE_1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.