Efficacy of RME and Facemask Therapy for Class III Malocclusion

NCT ID: NCT07053683

Last Updated: 2025-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

358 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This multicenter randomized controlled trial compares the efficacy of Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) combined with facemask (FM) protraction versus FM protraction alone in treating growing children with skeletal Class III malocclusion. The study aims to evaluate the differences in vertical skeletal changes and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) between the two treatments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Skeletal Class III malocclusion is a challenging craniofacial anomaly, particularly prevalent in Asian populations. Early orthopedic intervention aims to correct the discrepancy and guide favorable growth. While facemask (FM) protraction is a standard treatment, its efficacy can be enhanced by Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME), which is thought to disarticulate the circummaxillary sutures and facilitate a better orthopedic response. This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial was designed to rigorously compare the combined RME+FM therapy against FM therapy alone. The study's primary objective was to assess the impact of these interventions on vertical skeletal dimensions, a key concern in Class III treatment. The secondary objective was to evaluate the patient-centered outcome of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL). Eligible patients aged 7-12 were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Cephalometric and OHRQoL data were collected at baseline and after 12 months of active treatment to determine if the combined approach offers superior clinical outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental: RME+FM Group

Patients received a tooth-borne Hyrax-type rapid maxillary expander. After the active expansion phase, a Petit-type facemask was delivered, applying a forward and downward protraction force of 400-500g per side for 12-14 hours per day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Combined RME and Facemask Therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

This intervention involves two components. First, a tooth-borne Hyrax-type rapid maxillary expander is banded to the maxillary first permanent and deciduous molars. The screw is activated twice daily until posterior crossbite is overcorrected. Second, immediately following expansion, a Petit-type facemask is used to apply orthopedic protraction forces to the maxilla.

Control: Facemask (FM) Alone Group

Patients received the same facemask protraction therapy as the experimental group (same force, direction, and duration) but without undergoing RME. A removable mandibular occlusal splint was provided to disarticulate the occlusion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Facemask Therapy Alone

Intervention Type DEVICE

This intervention involves the use of a Petit-type facemask to apply orthopedic protraction forces (400-500g per side, 12-14 hours/day) to the maxilla. A removable mandibular occlusal splint (flat bite plane) is used concurrently to facilitate anterior crossbite correction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Combined RME and Facemask Therapy

This intervention involves two components. First, a tooth-borne Hyrax-type rapid maxillary expander is banded to the maxillary first permanent and deciduous molars. The screw is activated twice daily until posterior crossbite is overcorrected. Second, immediately following expansion, a Petit-type facemask is used to apply orthopedic protraction forces to the maxilla.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Facemask Therapy Alone

This intervention involves the use of a Petit-type facemask to apply orthopedic protraction forces (400-500g per side, 12-14 hours/day) to the maxilla. A removable mandibular occlusal splint (flat bite plane) is used concurrently to facilitate anterior crossbite correction.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Skeletal Class III malocclusion (ANB angle ≤ 0°) with a Wits appraisal ≤ -2 mm.
* Maxillary deficiency (SNA angle ≤ 80°).
* Prepubertal stage of skeletal development (Cervical Vertebral Maturation Stage CS1-CS3).
* Age between 7 and 12 years.
* Anterior crossbite or edge-to-edge incisor relationship.
* Angle Class III or end-on molar relationship.
* No previous orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Functional Class III malocclusion with no centric relation-centric occlusion discrepancy.
* Congenital craniofacial anomalies (e.g., cleft lip/palate).
* Severe systemic diseases.
* History of maxillofacial trauma.
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wuhan Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lulu Wang

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wuhan No.1 Hospital

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WHH-ORTHO-2018-021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.