A Quality Improvement Project to Assess and Refine the Handover Process at Morning Trauma Meetings

NCT ID: NCT04514601

Last Updated: 2020-08-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

317 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-23

Study Completion Date

2019-12-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project was intended to observe the handover of trauma and orthopaedic patients at a district general hospital in the UK. Following the implementation of a standard operating protocol, the handover of patient information improved including neck of femur fracture patients significantly. The study can therefore be utilised by other similarly structured departments to improve the handover process, thereby improving patient safety.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Poor handover and inadequate transmission of clinical information between shifts can result in patient harm. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of implementing a handover protocol on the quality of information exchanged in the trauma handover meetings in a UK hospital.

A prospective single centre observational study was performed at an acute NHS trust, using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology. Ten consecutive weekday trauma meetings, involving 43 patients, were observed to identify poor practices in handover. This data was used in conjunction with the Royal College of Surgeon's recommendations for effective handover (2007) to create a standard operating protocol (SOP). Following the implementation of the SOP, a further 8 consecutive weekday trauma meetings, involving a further 47 patients, were observed. The data collection was performed by 5 trained independent observers. The data was analysed using t test for quantitative variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck of Femur Fracture Fractures, Bone Orthopedic Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pre-Intervention Group

The verbal and written handover of these patients was observed. This included 146 general orthopaedic admissions patients and 43 trauma patients. All patient data was anonymised.

No interventions assigned to this group

Post-Intervention Group

The verbal and written handover of these patients was observed after the introduction of the intervention. This included 81 general orthopaedic admissions patients and 47 trauma patients. All patient data was anonymised.

Standard Operating Protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

This was a written protocol on how the handover process should be conducted.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard Operating Protocol

This was a written protocol on how the handover process should be conducted.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients that were handed over were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Nil.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Salman Sadiq

Foundation Year 2 Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Collette Samuels

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Audit Co-Ordinator Sandwell Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sandwell Hospital

West Bromwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QIP Trauma Meetings Sandwell

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.