Comparison of Conservative and Operative Treatment of Jones Fracture
NCT ID: NCT04037540
Last Updated: 2019-07-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-01-01
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study proposes a supposition of recommending the active operational approach, which shortens the period of healing by 6 weeks, limitation of physical activity by 4 weeks, and sick leave by 2 months. It also completely eliminates the need to perform a rigid fixation of the extremity for 8-12 weeks.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Operational approach
The patients enrolled in this arm underwent surgical treatment of the Jones fracture.
Operational approach
Operational approach was used to treat the Jones fracture in patients randomized into the respective study arm.
Conservative approach
The patients enrolled in this arm were treated conservatively, using fixation of the injured extremity.
Conservative approach
Conservative approach was used to treat the Jones fracture in patients randomized into the respective study arm.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Operational approach
Operational approach was used to treat the Jones fracture in patients randomized into the respective study arm.
Conservative approach
Conservative approach was used to treat the Jones fracture in patients randomized into the respective study arm.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* recurring injury
* diabetes mellitus
* chronic renal insufficiency
* osteopathy
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Ostrava
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jiří Demel, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Ostrava
Leopold Pleva, Ass.Prof.,MD,CSc.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Hospital Ostrava
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dameron TB Jr. Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Sep;57(6):788-92.
Kavanaugh JH, Brower TD, Mann RV. The Jones fracture revisited. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Sep;60(6):776-82.
Landorf KB. Clarifying proximal diaphyseal fifth metatarsal fractures. The acute fracture versus the stress fracture. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999 Aug;89(8):398-404. doi: 10.7547/87507315-89-8-398.
Malkus T, Soukup B. [Jones fracture.]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1999;66(1):15-21. Czech.
Marshall PD, Evans PD, Richards J. Laboratory comparison of the cannulated Herbert bone screw with ASIF cancellous lag screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Jan;75(1):89-92. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B1.8421045.
Mindrebo N, Shelbourne KD, Van Meter CD, Rettig AC. Outpatient percutaneous screw fixation of the acute Jones fracture. Am J Sports Med. 1993 Sep-Oct;21(5):720-3. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100514.
Nunley JA. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: the Jones fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001 Jan;32(1):171-80. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70200-5.
Pietropaoli MP, Wnorowski DC, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Sep;20(9):560-3. doi: 10.1177/107110079902000904.
Quill GE Jr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995 Apr;26(2):353-61.
Rosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 Sep-Oct;8(5):332-8. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200009000-00007.
STEWART IM. Jones's fracture: fracture of base of fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop. 1960;16:190-8. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CZ.02.1.01/00/00/17_049/00084
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
FNO-KUCH-01-Jones
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id