Effect of Sand on Knee Load and Muscle Activity During a Single Leg Landing Task

NCT ID: NCT04502615

Last Updated: 2022-04-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-03

Study Completion Date

2021-12-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the effect of different surfaces on the load experienced by the knee when landing from a single leg hop. A sand, pliable grass and firm (hard floor) surface will be compared when hopping from a 30 cm height. Each subject will complete 5 hops on each surface in a random order. The muscle activity in selected muscles of the lower limb will also be investigated to see how this differs in the landing leg, when landing on the different surfaces.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is twofold: 1) To investigate the effect of sand on landing kinematics and kinetics at the knee joint when performing a single leg jump landing task (dominant leg), comparing sand with a firm surface and pliable grass control. 2) To investigate the sEMG activity of the hamstring, quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles of the dominant leg during the jump landing task on these different surfaces (from take off through to terminal knee flexion at the end of the landing phase).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Single Leg Hop Sand Surface Single Leg Hop Grass Surface Single Leg Hop Firm Surface

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Randomised, repeated measures crossover design.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sand

Participants perform 5 single leg hops onto a Sand surface from a 30cm height

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sand

Intervention Type OTHER

sand surface

Artificial grass

Participants perform 5 single leg hops onto a grass surface from a 30cm height

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

artificial grass

Intervention Type OTHER

grass surface

Firm Ground

Participants perform 5 single leg hops onto a firm ground surface from a 30cm height

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

firm ground

Intervention Type OTHER

firm surface

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sand

sand surface

Intervention Type OTHER

artificial grass

grass surface

Intervention Type OTHER

firm ground

firm surface

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female
* Participate in a minimum of 3 hours sporting activity per week.
* Provided Informed Consent
* Must be over 16 years of age (16-45 years)

Exclusion Criteria

* Not willing to provide informed consent
* Pregnant
* History of ACL injury or other knee pathology
* Significant lower limb pathology
* Previous lower limb fracture or surgery
* Lower Limb injury in last 3 months.
* Male
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Teesside University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mark Richardson

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark Richardson, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Teesside University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Teesside University

Middlesbrough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Richardson MC, Evans W, Chesterton P, Wright M. The effects of a 6-week sand- vs. Land-based jump training programme on frontal plane knee angle and jump performance in adolescent female football players. J Sports Sci. 2025 Mar;43(6):523-535. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2025.2465946. Epub 2025 Feb 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39964088 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TeessideUni

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.