Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
20 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2015-06-01
Study Completion Date
2018-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Background: To effectively disrupt microbial biofilm and remove dental calculus with minimal damage to the root surface and soft tissues with limited patient discomfort constitute a significant tenet of periodontal therapy. The aim of the present prospective 12-month study was to compare clinical and microbiological effects following an erythritol air-polishing vs. conventional mechanical debridement of furcation defects in a cohort of periodontal maintenance patients.
Methods: Twenty patients with grade II mandibular molar furcation defects volunteered to enroll in this study. In a split-mouth design, two furcation sites in each patient were randomly assigned to either receive subgingival debridement using erythritol air-polishing (test) or conventional ultrasonic/curette debridement (control) at baseline, and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Probing depth, clinical attachment level and bleeding on probing were recorded at 3-month intervals. Subgingival microbiological samples obtained at baseline, 6 and 12 months were analyzed using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. Discomfort from treatment was scored at 12 months using a visual analogue scale.
Methods: Twenty patients with grade II mandibular molar furcation defects volunteered to enroll in this study. In a split-mouth design, two furcation sites in each patient were randomly assigned to either receive subgingival debridement using erythritol air-polishing (test) or conventional ultrasonic/curette debridement (control) at baseline, and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Probing depth, clinical attachment level and bleeding on probing were recorded at 3-month intervals. Subgingival microbiological samples obtained at baseline, 6 and 12 months were analyzed using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. Discomfort from treatment was scored at 12 months using a visual analogue scale.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis With and Without Erythritol Air-polishing
NCT04152668
Peri-Implantitis
COMPLETED
NA
The Efficacy of Diode Laser and Subgingival Air Polishing With Erythritol in Treatment of Periodontitis
NCT06209554
Periodontitis
COMPLETED
NA
A Chitosan Brush and Enamel Matrix Derivative for Non-surgical Treatment of Furcations
NCT06684769
Periodontitis, Adult
Furcation Defects
Furcation of Root of Tooth
+1 more
RECRUITING
NA
Soft Tissue Outcomes of Badly Broken-down Teeth Treated With Surgical Extrusion Compared With Immediate Implant Placement
NCT04437797
Broken Teeth
UNKNOWN
NA
Non Surgical Protocol for Treatment of Mucositis
NCT03951636
Peri-implant Mucositis
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
INTRODUCTION.Traditionally, periodontal debridement is accomplished using curettes, sonic or ultrasonic scalers, all presenting comparable outcomes.1,2 However, periodic root instrumentation may lead to dental hard tissue3-6 and soft tissue damage,7 and sensitivity due to exposure of dentinal tubules.8-10 Air-polishing using low abrasive glycine or trehalose powder has been shown to reach similar clinical outcomes as hand and ultrasonic instrumentation, but with less hard tissue loss.11-16 Moreover, air-polishing provides superior outcomes relative to patient comfort and time efficiency.7,11,12,14 Recently, a low abrasive erythritol powder with comparable physical properties to glycine air-polishing powder was introduced for subgingival air-polishing.17 Erythritol, a non-toxic, chemically neutral and completely water-soluble polyol is widely used in food industry as an artificial sweetener. Two studies comparing conventional mechanical debridement with erythritol air-polishing, reported similar results in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) relative to clinical and microbiological outcomes.18,19 Such observations are also reflected in a systematic review concluding that air-polishing systems as a monotherapy are comparable to conventional therapy in patients undergoing SPT in single- and multi-rooted teeth without furcations.20 Moreover, inhibitory effects on pathogenic bacteria including Porphyromonas gingivalis have also been observed.21 To the investigator's knowledge, no prospective studies investigating the efficacy of a low abrasive erythritol air-polishing system in molar furcation defects during SPT have been reported. The objective of this 12-month prospective study was to compare clinical and microbiological effects following an erythritol air-polishing system vs. conventional mechanical debridement of furcation defects in a cohort of periodontal maintenance patients.
METHOD AND MATERIALS. The study protocol and informed consent following the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (version 2008) was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee (2016/793), University of Bergen, Norway. Participating subjects read and signed the informed consent prior to enrolling in the study.
Prestudy calibration and training. Two operators performed the clinical aspects of this study. Author TS, masked to treatment assignments, performed all clinical recordings and sampling, author IU performed all treatments.
Sample size. The sample size estimation was based on change in PD. A difference of 0.5 mm was considered clinically relevant.22 Standard deviation of the difference between repeated PD measurements from the intra-calibration exercise was 0.5 mm. A power analysis based on 20 subjects and with the level of significance (α) set to 0.05, resulted in 98.9% power to detect a true difference of 0.5 mm.
Treatments. Following baseline examination, mandibular jaw quadrants were randomized (coin toss) to either receive debridement using the erythritol powder/air-polishing system (test) or conventional ultrasonic/curette instrumentation (control) using a split-mouth study design. Sequence of treatments was randomized in a similar fashion. Treatments were delivered at baseline, and repeated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Test sites thus received root debridement using the low abrasive erythritol powder (Air-flow powder plus®, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland ) applied through a Perio-Flow hand piece connected to an airflow unit (Air-Flow Master®, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland). The hand piece was fitted with a nozzle for subgingival delivery directing the power/air jet perpendicular to the root surface at the water exit at the tip of the nozzle. The nozzle was inserted to the apical aspect of furcation sites with PD≥ 4 mm using striking movements over the furcation area for 5 sec.12 Sites adjoining the test site with PD≥ 4 mm were similarly treated.
Control sites were debrided using an ultrasonic scaler (Piezon Master 400 Perio Slim Tip®; Electro Medical System, Nyon, Switzerland) with power set at 75% and water as coolant, and root planed with sharp curettes (Gracey SAS, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
Patients were returned to their regular SPT upon completion of study. Gingival crevicular fluid assessments. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was recorded at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. Briefly, furcation sites were isolated with cottons rolls, cleaned for supragingival plaque, and air-dried. A perio paper strip was then placed 1-2 mm into the orifice of the site and left in place for 30 sec. Next, the perio strip was inserted into the Periotron 8000® (Oraflow, Smithtown, NY, USA) calibrated to estimate the volume of GCF collected.
Microbiological assessments. At baseline, and at 6 and 12 months the supragingival area above the furcation site was wiped clean using sterile cotton pellets. Three sterile paper points were then inserted into the pocket of the furcation site. The paper points were kept in place 20 sec27 removed and immersed into pre-reduced, anaerobic transport medium (PRAS; Dental Transport Medium, Morgan Hill, CA, USA).
Pain experience assessments. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were used to estimate patient discomfort experienced during test and control treatment.31 Scoring was performed at 12 months following completion of the debridement with 0="no pain" and 100="worst pain I can imagine".
Statistical analysis Data were entered into MS-Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA ) proofed for errors and then imported into Stata, version 15 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
Summary statistics (means ± SEM) for the clinical variables were calculated for the test and control at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. Due to the repeated nature of data, a mixed effect model taking into consideration incomplete data at 12 months was applied to analyze the data at patient and tooth level. Time and treatment were considered fixed factors. Mixed models were applied for both primary and secondary outcome variables.
For testing differences in microbial composition at test and control sites harboring different proportions of bacteria \>105 at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months, logistic regression models with robust standard error were applied. VAS scores were analyzed using ordinary linear regression models with robust standard error. The level of significance was set at 0.05.
METHOD AND MATERIALS. The study protocol and informed consent following the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (version 2008) was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee (2016/793), University of Bergen, Norway. Participating subjects read and signed the informed consent prior to enrolling in the study.
Prestudy calibration and training. Two operators performed the clinical aspects of this study. Author TS, masked to treatment assignments, performed all clinical recordings and sampling, author IU performed all treatments.
Sample size. The sample size estimation was based on change in PD. A difference of 0.5 mm was considered clinically relevant.22 Standard deviation of the difference between repeated PD measurements from the intra-calibration exercise was 0.5 mm. A power analysis based on 20 subjects and with the level of significance (α) set to 0.05, resulted in 98.9% power to detect a true difference of 0.5 mm.
Treatments. Following baseline examination, mandibular jaw quadrants were randomized (coin toss) to either receive debridement using the erythritol powder/air-polishing system (test) or conventional ultrasonic/curette instrumentation (control) using a split-mouth study design. Sequence of treatments was randomized in a similar fashion. Treatments were delivered at baseline, and repeated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Test sites thus received root debridement using the low abrasive erythritol powder (Air-flow powder plus®, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland ) applied through a Perio-Flow hand piece connected to an airflow unit (Air-Flow Master®, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland). The hand piece was fitted with a nozzle for subgingival delivery directing the power/air jet perpendicular to the root surface at the water exit at the tip of the nozzle. The nozzle was inserted to the apical aspect of furcation sites with PD≥ 4 mm using striking movements over the furcation area for 5 sec.12 Sites adjoining the test site with PD≥ 4 mm were similarly treated.
Control sites were debrided using an ultrasonic scaler (Piezon Master 400 Perio Slim Tip®; Electro Medical System, Nyon, Switzerland) with power set at 75% and water as coolant, and root planed with sharp curettes (Gracey SAS, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
Patients were returned to their regular SPT upon completion of study. Gingival crevicular fluid assessments. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was recorded at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. Briefly, furcation sites were isolated with cottons rolls, cleaned for supragingival plaque, and air-dried. A perio paper strip was then placed 1-2 mm into the orifice of the site and left in place for 30 sec. Next, the perio strip was inserted into the Periotron 8000® (Oraflow, Smithtown, NY, USA) calibrated to estimate the volume of GCF collected.
Microbiological assessments. At baseline, and at 6 and 12 months the supragingival area above the furcation site was wiped clean using sterile cotton pellets. Three sterile paper points were then inserted into the pocket of the furcation site. The paper points were kept in place 20 sec27 removed and immersed into pre-reduced, anaerobic transport medium (PRAS; Dental Transport Medium, Morgan Hill, CA, USA).
Pain experience assessments. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were used to estimate patient discomfort experienced during test and control treatment.31 Scoring was performed at 12 months following completion of the debridement with 0="no pain" and 100="worst pain I can imagine".
Statistical analysis Data were entered into MS-Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA ) proofed for errors and then imported into Stata, version 15 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
Summary statistics (means ± SEM) for the clinical variables were calculated for the test and control at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. Due to the repeated nature of data, a mixed effect model taking into consideration incomplete data at 12 months was applied to analyze the data at patient and tooth level. Time and treatment were considered fixed factors. Mixed models were applied for both primary and secondary outcome variables.
For testing differences in microbial composition at test and control sites harboring different proportions of bacteria \>105 at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months, logistic regression models with robust standard error were applied. VAS scores were analyzed using ordinary linear regression models with robust standard error. The level of significance was set at 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Periodontitis
Adult Periodontitis
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Randomized, single-masked controlled trial (RCT). A split-mouth study design where each of the furcation in the lower jaw molars was randomized to the two specific treatments. Hence, each patient received both interventions randomly allocated to each side of the lower jaw.
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
DOUBLE
Investigators
Outcome Assessors
Two operators performed the clinical aspects of this study. Author TS, masked to treatment assignments, performed all clinical recordings and sampling, author IU performed all treatments. All analyses were performed by a statistician (SAL) who had not taken part in data collection or treatments.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Titanium curette and ultrasonic.
Debridement of mandibular furcations with conventional ultrasonic/curette (control).
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Gracey curette.
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Root planed was performed with curettes (Gracey SAS, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
Ultrasonic scaler.
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Debridement was performed with an ultrasonic scaler (Piezon Master 400 Perio Slim Tip®; Electro Medical System, Nyon, Switzerland).
Erythritol air-polishing.
Treatment of mandibular furcations with erythritol powder/air-polishing system (test)
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Erythritol air-polishing.
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Treatment was performed with a low abrasive erythritol powder (Air-flow powder plus®, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland ) applied through a Perio-Flow hand piece connected to an airflow unit (Air-Flow Master®, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gracey curette.
Root planed was performed with curettes (Gracey SAS, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Ultrasonic scaler.
Debridement was performed with an ultrasonic scaler (Piezon Master 400 Perio Slim Tip®; Electro Medical System, Nyon, Switzerland).
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Erythritol air-polishing.
Treatment was performed with a low abrasive erythritol powder (Air-flow powder plus®, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland ) applied through a Perio-Flow hand piece connected to an airflow unit (Air-Flow Master®, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland).
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Received supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) every 3-6 months for 2-3 years following periodontal therapy.
2. Having bilateral non-mobile, fully erupted mandibular first, second or third molars with degree II furcation defects.
3. PD≥4 mm with bleeding or pus on probing. -
2. Having bilateral non-mobile, fully erupted mandibular first, second or third molars with degree II furcation defects.
3. PD≥4 mm with bleeding or pus on probing. -
Exclusion Criteria
1. Mobile mandibular molars, molars with clinical or radiographic evidence of supra-/subgingival calculus or apical pathology.
2. Use of systemic antibiotics within 6 months or SPT within 3 months of study.
3. Any current medical condition affecting periodontal treatment or use of the abrasive air-polishing device.
4. Subjects with diabetes, cancer, HIV/aids, acute infections, disorders that may compromise wound healing, or pregnant women.
\-
2. Use of systemic antibiotics within 6 months or SPT within 3 months of study.
3. Any current medical condition affecting periodontal treatment or use of the abrasive air-polishing device.
4. Subjects with diabetes, cancer, HIV/aids, acute infections, disorders that may compromise wound healing, or pregnant women.
\-
Minimum Eligible Age
30 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
80 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bergen
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Knut N. Leknes
Professor
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Knut N. Leknes, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Clinical Dentistry - Periodontics, University of Bergen, NORWAY.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wilson TG Jr. Supportive periodontal treatment introduction--definition, extent of need, therapeutic objectives, frequency and efficacy. Periodontol 2000. 1996 Oct;12:11-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1996.tb00074.x. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Badersten A, Nilveus R, Egelberg J. Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. II. Severely advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1984 Jan;11(1):63-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1984.tb01309.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zappa U, Smith B, Simona C, Graf H, Case D, Kim W. Root substance removal by scaling and root planing. J Periodontol. 1991 Dec;62(12):750-4. doi: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.12.750.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Flemmig TF, Petersilka GJ, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B. Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro. J Periodontol. 1998 May;69(5):547-53. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.5.547.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lie T, Leknes KN. Evaluation of the effect on root surfaces of air turbine scalers and ultrasonic instrumentation. J Periodontol. 1985 Sep;56(9):522-31. doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.9.522.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Schmidlin PR, Beuchat M, Busslinger A, Lehmann B, Lutz F. Tooth substance loss resulting from mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic root instrumentation assessed by liquid scintillation. J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Nov;28(11):1058-66. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.281111.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Petersilka GJ. Subgingival air-polishing in the treatment of periodontal biofilm infections. Periodontol 2000. 2011 Feb;55(1):124-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00342.x. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fischer C, Wennberg A, Fischer RG, Attstrom R. Clinical evaluation of pulp and dentine sensitivity after supragingival and subgingival scaling. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991 Dec;7(6):259-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1991.tb00214.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Latheef P, Sirajuddin S, Gundapaneni V, Mn K, Apine A. Iatrogenic Damage to the Periodontium Caused by Periodontal Treatment Procedures. Open Dent J. 2015 Jun 26;9:203-7. doi: 10.2174/1874210601509010203. eCollection 2015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lin YH, Gillam DG. The Prevalence of Root Sensitivity following Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:407023. doi: 10.1155/2012/407023. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Petersilka GJ, Steinmann D, Haberlein I, Heinecke A, Flemmig TF. Subgingival plaque removal in buccal and lingual sites using a novel low abrasive air-polishing powder. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Apr;30(4):328-33. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00290.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Petersilka G. Re: "Subgingival plaque removal using a new air-polishing device". Moene R, Decaillet F, Andersen E, Mombelli A. (J Periodontol 2010;81:79-88.). J Periodontol. 2010 Jul;81(7):962-3. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100118. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Flemmig TF, Arushanov D, Daubert D, Rothen M, Mueller G, Leroux BG. Randomized controlled trial assessing efficacy and safety of glycine powder air polishing in moderate-to-deep periodontal pockets. J Periodontol. 2012 Apr;83(4):444-52. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110367. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wennstrom JL, Dahlen G, Ramberg P. Subgingival debridement of periodontal pockets by air polishing in comparison with ultrasonic instrumentation during maintenance therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Sep;38(9):820-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01751.x. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Caygur A, Albaba MR, Berberoglu A, Yilmaz HG. Efficacy of glycine powder air-polishing combined with scaling and root planing in the treatment of periodontitis and halitosis: A randomised clinical study. J Int Med Res. 2017 Jun;45(3):1168-1174. doi: 10.1177/0300060517705540. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kruse AB, Akakpo DL, Maamar R, Woelber JP, Al-Ahmad A, Vach K, Ratka-Krueger P. Trehalose powder for subgingival air-polishing during periodontal maintenance therapy: A randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2019 Mar;90(3):263-270. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0403. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hagi TT, Hofmanner P, Salvi GE, Ramseier CA, Sculean A. Clinical outcomes following subgingival application of a novel erythritol powder by means of air polishing in supportive periodontal therapy: a randomized, controlled clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2013 Nov-Dec;44(10):753-61. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30606.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hagi TT, Hofmanner P, Eick S, Donnet M, Salvi GE, Sculean A, Ramseier CA. The effects of erythritol air-polishing powder on microbiologic and clinical outcomes during supportive periodontal therapy: Six-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Quintessence Int. 2015 Jan;46(1):31-41. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a32817.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Muller N, Moene R, Cancela JA, Mombelli A. Subgingival air-polishing with erythritol during periodontal maintenance: randomized clinical trial of twelve months. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Sep;41(9):883-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12289. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ng E, Byun R, Spahr A, Divnic-Resnik T. The efficacy of air polishing devices in supportive periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int. 2018;49(6):453-467. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a40341.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hashino E, Kuboniwa M, Alghamdi SA, Yamaguchi M, Yamamoto R, Cho H, Amano A. Erythritol alters microstructure and metabolomic profiles of biofilm composed of Streptococcus gordonii and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2013 Dec;28(6):435-51. doi: 10.1111/omi.12037. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bunaes DF, Lie SA, Enersen M, Aastrom AN, Mustafa K, Leknes KN. Site-specific treatment outcome in smokers following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Oct;42(10):933-42. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12462. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Muhlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding--a leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta. 1971 Oct;15(2):107-13. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hamp SE, Nyman S, Lindhe J. Periodontal treatment of multirooted teeth. Results after 5 years. J Clin Periodontol. 1975 Aug;2(3):126-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1975.tb01734.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Barros SP, Williams R, Offenbacher S, Morelli T. Gingival crevicular fluid as a source of biomarkers for periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2016 Feb;70(1):53-64. doi: 10.1111/prd.12107.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Belibasakis GN, Schmidlin PR, Sahrmann P. Molecular microbiological evaluation of subgingival biofilm sampling by paper point and curette. APMIS. 2014 Apr;122(4):347-52. doi: 10.1111/apm.12151. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Smith C, Martin L, Haffajee JA, Uzel NG, Goodson JM. Use of checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization to study complex microbial ecosystems. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004 Dec;19(6):352-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.2004.00168.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Socransky SS, Smith C, Martin L, Paster BJ, Dewhirst FE, Levin AE. "Checkerboard" DNA-DNA hybridization. Biotechniques. 1994 Oct;17(4):788-92.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL Jr. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Feb;25(2):134-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02419.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990 Aug;13(4):227-36. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770130405.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Krohn-Dale I, Boe OE, Enersen M, Leknes KN. Er:YAG laser in the treatment of periodontal sites with recurring chronic inflammation: a 12-month randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Aug;39(8):745-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01912.x. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hujoel PP, Loesche WJ. Efficiency of split-mouth designs. J Clin Periodontol. 1990 Nov;17(10):722-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1990.tb01060.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hujoel PP, DeRouen TA. Validity issues in split-mouth trials. J Clin Periodontol. 1992 Oct;19(9 Pt 1):625-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1992.tb01709.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hujoel PP. Design and analysis issues in split mouth clinical trials. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;26(2):85-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01932.x. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cobb CM. Non-surgical pocket therapy: mechanical. Ann Periodontol. 1996 Nov;1(1):443-90. doi: 10.1902/annals.1996.1.1.443. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bower RC. Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation entrance architecture. J Periodontol. 1979 Jan;50(1):23-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1979.50.1.23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bower RC. Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation root surface anatomy. J Periodontol. 1979 Jul;50(7):366-74. doi: 10.1902/jop.1979.50.7.366. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Petersilka GJ, Tunkel J, Barakos K, Heinecke A, Haberlein I, Flemmig TF. Subgingival plaque removal at interdental sites using a low-abrasive air polishing powder. J Periodontol. 2003 Mar;74(3):307-11. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.307.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Armitage GC. Analysis of gingival crevice fluid and risk of progression of periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2004;34:109-19. doi: 10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.003427.x. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tsang YC, Corbet EF, Jin LJ. Subgingival glycine powder air-polishing as an additional approach to nonsurgical periodontal therapy in subjects with untreated chronic periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):440-445. doi: 10.1111/jre.12532. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bunaes DF, Mustafa M, Mohamed HG, Lie SA, Leknes KN. The effect of smoking on inflammatory and bone remodeling markers in gingival crevicular fluid and subgingival microbiota following periodontal therapy. J Periodontal Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):713-724. doi: 10.1111/jre.12438. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hagi TT, Klemensberger S, Bereiter R, Nietzsche S, Cosgarea R, Flury S, Lussi A, Sculean A, Eick S. A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131056. eCollection 2015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Antczak-Bouckoms AA, Tulloch JF, Berkey CS. Split-mouth and cross-over designs in dental research. J Clin Periodontol. 1990 Aug;17(7 Pt 1):446-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1990.tb02343.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ulvik IM, Saethre T, Bunaes DF, Lie SA, Enersen M, Leknes KN. A 12-month randomized controlled trial evaluating erythritol air-polishing versus curette/ultrasonic debridement of mandibular furcations in supportive periodontal therapy. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jan 21;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01397-3.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016/793
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Soft Tissue Outcomes Of Badly Broken-Down Teeth Treated With Orthodontic Extrusion Compared With Immediate Implant Placement
NCT04436094
UNKNOWN
NA
Non Surgical Protocol for Treatment of Peri-implantitis
NCT03451981
COMPLETED
NA
Surgical Protocol for Peri-implantitis Treatment
NCT03801187
UNKNOWN
NA
Non-surgical Step 3 Periodontal Treatment With/Without Adjunctive Protocol - Pilot RCT.
NCT06438354
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Evaluation of Platelet-rich Fibrin for Revascularization of Immature Permanent Teeth Versus Standard Apexification
NCT06693349
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Use of Injectable Extended Platelet-Rich Fibrin as a Local Drug Delivery in the Treatment of Stage II Periodontitis Patients
NCT07080294
COMPLETED
NA
Furcation Treatment With L-PRF and aPDT
NCT04842188
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of Adjunctive Injectable PRF Therapy Used in Conjunction With Scaling and Root Planning
NCT03839849
COMPLETED
NA
The Effect of A-PRF+ Versus Open Flap Debridement in the Treatment of Patients With Stage III Periodontitis
NCT03924336
COMPLETED
NA
Advanced Platelet-rich Fibrin Combined With Open Debridement in Management of Suprabony Periodontal Defects
NCT05730153
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Efficacy of Ceramic Soft Tissue Trimming Bur Versus Conventional Scalpel Technique in Ginigival Depigmentation Procedure
NCT06031116
COMPLETED
NA
ASSESSMENT OF SOFT TISSUE HEALING OVER IMMEDIATELY PLACED IMPLANT SEALED WITH PLATELETS RICH FIBRIN (PRF) VERSUS DIODE LASER
NCT05517733
COMPLETED
NA
Clinical Evaluation of Injectable Alb-PRF in the Management of Intrabony Defect in Stage-III Periodontitis Patients
NCT06297577
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Repair of Orthodontically-induced Tooth Root Resorption by Ultrasound
NCT00423956
UNKNOWN
PHASE1/PHASE2
Hyaluronic Acid Versus Red Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Treatment of Periodontitis
NCT05768243
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Effect of Laser Use on Guided Tissue Regeneration in Treatment of Molar Teeth With Class 2 Furcation Affected by Periodontitis
NCT01522131
COMPLETED
NA
Scaling and Root Planning With Localized Delivery of Autogenous Growth Factors- Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF)
NCT04978324
WITHDRAWN
PHASE3
Effect of I-PRF After Gingivectomy
NCT07174934
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Evaluation of Functional Versus IADT Splinting Times on Tooth Mobility After Surgical Extrusion
NCT03700866
UNKNOWN
NA
Chitosan Brushes vs Air-Abrasive Devices on Peri-implant Mucositis Treatment: A Randomized Clinical
NCT06287957
RECRUITING
NA
Concentrated Growth Factors in Regenerative Therapy in Furcation Involvements in Humans
NCT03180658
UNKNOWN
NA
Growth Factors in the Treatment of the Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05319938
COMPLETED
NA
Digital Planning and Guided Dual Technique in Aesthetic Crown Lengthening
NCT04922086
COMPLETED
NA
The Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Methods Before Definitive Digital Impression
NCT06132815
COMPLETED
NA
Combined Use of Er:YAG and Nd:YAG Laser
NCT02851823
COMPLETED
NA