A Chitosan Brush and Enamel Matrix Derivative for Non-surgical Treatment of Furcations
NCT ID: NCT06684769
Last Updated: 2025-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-15
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients diagnosed with stage III or IV periodontitis who exhibit maxillary first or second molars with Class II, Subclass A, or B buccal furcation defects (horizontal probing depth of ≥ 3 mm ) if furcation involvement on the palatal side (mesiopalatal and distopalatal) does not exceed Class 1 will be recruited.
This study will be a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial with a split-mouth design.
Patients will be recruited from the clinics of the Riga Stradiņš University Institute of Stomatology of Riga, Latvia.
Before the baseline treatment, all patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be given detailed oral hygiene instructions and motivation.
Patients' furcation defects in each quadrant will be randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to either the application of Oscillating Chitosan Brush with Enamel Matrix Derivatives (test group) or Oscillating Chitosan Brush alone (control group).
Non-surgical periodontal treatment of furcation defects on the test side will be performed through the application of Oscillating Chitosan Brush with Enamel Matrix Derivatives and on the control side with Oscillating Chitosan Brush alone.
The re-evaluation of periodontal status will be performed 12 weeks following the baseline treatment.
Biofilm samples and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples will be taken at the baseline and at 4 weeks.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Flapless Application of Enamel Matrix Derivative in Class II Mandibular Furcation Defects
NCT05541614
EMD for Treatment of Proximal Class-II Furcation Involvements
NCT03320135
Mandibular Furcation III Regeneration (FURC-III-REGEN)
NCT04059458
Air-polishing or Conventional Treatment
NCT04493398
Flapless Periodontal Regeneration Using Hyaluronic Acid Versus Enamel Matrix Derivative
NCT07339605
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chitosan brush with Emdogain FL
Furcation Involved areas will be treated with the oscillating chitosan brush Labrida BioClean® and Straumann® Emdogain® FL at Baseline
Emdogain® FL
Enamel Matrix Derivatives
Labrida BioClean®
Oscillating Chitosan Brush
Chitosan brush alone
Furcation Involved areas will be treated with the oscillating chitosan brush Labrida BioClean® at Baseline
Labrida BioClean®
Oscillating Chitosan Brush
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Emdogain® FL
Enamel Matrix Derivatives
Labrida BioClean®
Oscillating Chitosan Brush
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The patient does not have any systemic diseases that may affect the results of the study
3. The patient has a plaque index of 20% or less at the study entry
4. The patient has a history of severe localized or generalized periodontitis (stage III or IV)
5. Completed the first and second steps of periodontal treatment (According to Treatment of stage I-III periodontitis-The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline) (Sanz M. et al.)
6. Buccal and/or lingual Class 2A and/or 2B furcation involvement (FI) defects on both sides of the Mandibular first and/or second molars after completing the first and second steps of periodontal treatment.
7. Buccal Class 2A and/or 2B furcation involvement (FI) defects on both sides of the maxillary first and/or second molars after completion of the first and second step of periodontal treatment if furcation involvement on the palatal side (mesiopalatal and distopalatal) does not exceed Class 1.
8. Psychological appropriateness
9. Consents to all follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria
2. Use of medications that may affect study results (anti-osteoporotic drugs, statins, corticosteroids, anticoagulants)
3. Patients who use calcium channel blockers, cyclosporine A or antiepileptic drugs if there are clinically visible hyperplastic changes in the gingival margin.
4. Patients who have received any type of systemic antibiotics in the last six months prior to the start of the study and patients starting antibiotics during the study
5. Patients requiring antibiotic premedication prior to periodontal treatment
6. Oncological disease
7. Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (active or history)
8. Pregnancy and breastfeeding
9. Any condition or current treatment which, in the opinion of the investigator and/or consulting physician, may present an unreasonable risk
10. Psychoemotional disorders and depression
11. Use of antipsychotic medication or antidepressants
12. Lack of patient motivation to undertake adequate dental care at home or complete periodontal treatment, patients residing outside Latvia
13. Molars with combined endodontic-periodontal lesions, active endodontic infection
14. Prosthetic factors for molars not allowing clinical measurements
15. Huge restoration or amalgam fillings that could potentially cause fractures or furcation involvement
16. Enamel pearls or filling or crown margins
17. Decay or root resorption
18. Tooth mobility degree 3
19. Molars in which the gingival margin is positioned apically from the entrance into the furcation area
20. Clinical attachment level and or pockets mesial and distal to the furcation involvement defect of 6 or more mm
21. Strong vomiting reflex that would prevent adequate periodontal treatment
22. People close to the study subjects, work colleagues, relatives, etc.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Turku
OTHER
University of Oslo
OTHER
Labrida AS
INDUSTRY
Riga Stradins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anete Vaškevica
Lectureur
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ilze Akota, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Riga Stradins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Riga Stradins University Institute of Stomatology
Riga, , Latvia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2-PĒK-4/659/2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.