Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-05
2020-07-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The long-term result of biofeedback therapy is one of the most important subjects of controversy, and few studies have extended to 2 years of follow-up 11. So, the purpose of this study was to evaluate quantitatively the short-term and long-term efficacy of biofeedback training as a treatment tool designed to control functional non-retentive fecal incontinence in children and its long term impact on the quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biofeedback Vs Electrical Stimulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
NCT04380571
Biofeedback Therapy Alone Versus Biofeedback Therapy With Medical Treatment for Dysfunctional Voiding in Children
NCT07149532
Biofeedback Intervention in Rehabilitation of Adolescence With Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty
NCT06053879
Treatment of Patients With Fecal Incontinence
NCT00292318
Biofeedback for Fecal Incontinence
NCT00124904
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is an extremely embarrassing and psychologically frustrating shameful problem with a bad impact on children3. It can lead to social isolation, loss of self-confidence, depression, and behavioral problems4. The underlying mechanism of functional non-retentive fecal incontinence is largely unknown. The pathophysiology seems to be complex and it is considered to be a multifactorial disorder5. Approximately 95% of the children had no organic cause and these children are considered to have a functional defecation disorder. Of this, in approximately 80% of these children FI is results of constipation and is treated with laxatives, the remaining 20% without signs of fecal retention is classified as FNRFI6 The negative psychological and social impact for these children is high, however, and requires adequate intervention7. Biofeedback therapy is a feasible option that has been used for fecal incontinence over several decades8. The underlying premise of biofeedback, as with learning any physical activity, is that "practice makes perfect" if the learner is provided with accurate feedback to make adjustments to optimize performance So, the purpose of this study was to evaluate quantitatively the short-term and long-term efficacy of biofeedback training as a treatment tool designed to control functional non-retentive fecal incontinence in children and its long term impact on the quality of life.
Methods:
The present study included 100 children of both sexes that were included with an age ranged from (5-14 years) with FNRFI with normal bowel habits, normal defecation frequency, and normal stool consistency with incontinence score ranging from 6-24 according to Vaizey score 12. Exclusion criteria included; children who have traumatic sphincter injury, fecal impaction, spinal diseases causing incontinence, anorectal malformation, and children who were not cooperative. Patients included in this study were randomly divided and allocated into two groups Control group and Study group. Written informed consent was obtained from parents of all included children.
A detailed history was taken including bowel habits, duration history of trauma. Complete physical examination to exclude patients requiring surgical correction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
A detailed history was taken including bowel habits, duration history of trauma. Complete physical examination to exclude patients requiring surgical correction
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Patients belonging to the control group received conventional physical therapy program in the form of diet and Kegel exercises.
Traditional Treatment
Patients belonging to the control group received conventional physical therapy program in the form of:
1. Dietetic Regulation: The diet was given in the form of the bulk-forming diet, fruits, vegetables, cereals, and bran.
2. Pelvic floor muscle exercises (Kegal exercises): The patient was instructed to lie crock lying position with knees bent. He/she was instructed to pull his/her pelvic muscles upward and inward and hold the contraction for 6 seconds as if to hold back a defecation movement, followed by relaxation for 6 seconds. The exercise was repeated 25 times. Gradually increase the time until reaching 10 seconds of contraction and relaxation for each with repetition up to 30 times. The exercises applied twice per week for 3 months.
Study group
Patients belonging to the study group were subjected to the same conventional physical therapy program in addition to biofeedback training
Biofeedback
Patients belonging to the study group were subjected to the same conventional physical therapy program in addition to biofeedback training.
Biofeedback was planned after full guardians' education. Local hygiene for perianal skin for soiling episodes and using zinc oxide cream to prevent excoriation. Biofeedback was done using two types of catheters; a 24-channel water-perfused catheter with latex balloon for sensory training and a double-lumen rectal PVC balloon clothed catheter (MMS U-72210) for strength training. Each biofeedback session took 30 minutes with two sessions per week for 3 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Traditional Treatment
Patients belonging to the control group received conventional physical therapy program in the form of:
1. Dietetic Regulation: The diet was given in the form of the bulk-forming diet, fruits, vegetables, cereals, and bran.
2. Pelvic floor muscle exercises (Kegal exercises): The patient was instructed to lie crock lying position with knees bent. He/she was instructed to pull his/her pelvic muscles upward and inward and hold the contraction for 6 seconds as if to hold back a defecation movement, followed by relaxation for 6 seconds. The exercise was repeated 25 times. Gradually increase the time until reaching 10 seconds of contraction and relaxation for each with repetition up to 30 times. The exercises applied twice per week for 3 months.
Biofeedback
Patients belonging to the study group were subjected to the same conventional physical therapy program in addition to biofeedback training.
Biofeedback was planned after full guardians' education. Local hygiene for perianal skin for soiling episodes and using zinc oxide cream to prevent excoriation. Biofeedback was done using two types of catheters; a 24-channel water-perfused catheter with latex balloon for sensory training and a double-lumen rectal PVC balloon clothed catheter (MMS U-72210) for strength training. Each biofeedback session took 30 minutes with two sessions per week for 3 months.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Children with normal defecation frequency and normal stool consistency
* Children with incontinence score ranging from 6-24 according to Vaizey score
Exclusion Criteria
* Children who have Fecal impaction
* Children who have Spinal diseases causing incontinence
* Children who have Anorectal malformation
* Children who were not cooperative
5 Years
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Benha University
OTHER
Batterjee Medical College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed A. Abdel Ghafar
Associate Professor of Physical Therapy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emad M Abdelrahman, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Bnha University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Benha University
Banhā, Al Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BatterjeeMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.