Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
117 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1999-09-30
2006-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* to compare biofeedback to alternative therapies for which patients have a similar expectation of benefit;
* to identify which patients are most likely to benefit; and
* to assess the impact of treatment on quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biofeedback for Fecal Incontinence
NCT00124904
Home Biofeedback Therapy for Dyssynergic Defecation, Fecal Incontinence and Urinary Incontinence
NCT05771597
Treatment of Patients With Fecal Incontinence
NCT00292318
Combination Therapy With Biofeedback, Loperamide and Stool Bulking Agents
NCT02165475
Home Versus Office Biofeedback Therapy for Fecal Incontinence
NCT03216291
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Biofeedback
Diazepam
Pelvic floor retraining
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior history of biofeedback treatment for pelvic floor disorders
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William E Whitehead, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of North Carolina Department of Medicine
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Palsson OS, Heymen S, Whitehead WE. Biofeedback treatment for functional anorectal disorders: a comprehensive efficacy review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2004 Sep;29(3):153-74. doi: 10.1023/b:apbi.0000039055.18609.64.
Heymen S, Jones KR, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Biofeedback treatment of constipation: a critical review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Sep;46(9):1208-17. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6717-8.
Whitehead WE, Heymen S, Schuster MM. Motility as a therapeutic modality: biofeedback treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. Chapter 27. In MM Schuster, MD Crowell, KL Koch (Eds.), Schuster Atlas of Gastrointestinal Motility in Health and Disease. London, BC Decker Inc. 2002; 381-397.
Heymen S, Jones KR, Ringel Y, Scarlett Y, Drossman D, Whitehead WE (abstract). Biofeedback for fecal incontinence and constipation: the role of medical management and education. Gastro 2001 (suppl 1):120, A397.
Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Constipated subjects reporting physical abuse are more likely to fail an education/medical management intervention. Am J Gastroenterol Suppl 2004;99:T1364
Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Severity of constipation and anxiety predict failure to improve with conservative medical treatment for constipation. Am J Gastroenterol Suppl 2004;99:T1370
Heymen S, Scarlett Y, and Whitehead WE. Elevated Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Scores Predict Biofeedback Treatment Failure for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation (abstract). Gastroenterology 2003,124:4(suppl 1)A-685.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RO1 DK57048b (completed)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.