Biofeedback and Cortical Excitability

NCT ID: NCT00653887

Last Updated: 2012-02-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Looking for a modification of the cortical excitability of the motor area corresponding to the external anal sphincter after biofeedback sessions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: Nervous control of pelvic floor is not much known. The dysfunction of this musculature, and particularly of the external anal sphincter, is a frequent cause of anal incontinence and/or dyschesia. Biofeedback training is often offered to patients suffering from incontinence or constipation. However, its mechanisms of action is still controversial.

Objective of the study: to compare excitability of the cortical area responsible for control volunteer of the external anal sphincter in healthy subjects before and after 4 biofeedback sessions.

Subjects and methodology: we offer to perform two groups of 12 healthy subjects (one active and one control group) without any neurological or digestive disease and having never performed biofeedback. In each group, cortical excitability will be evaluated by cortical magnetic stimulation (curve intensity/amplitude, silent period, inter-stimulus period, motor threshold) before and after 4 biofeedback sessions (one session by week) in active group or 4 placebo sessions (placebo group).

We hope to show a modification of cortical excitability in subjects performing biofeedback compared to others.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Incontinence Constipation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

biofeedback (active group)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Biofeedback

Intervention Type OTHER

4 sessions of biofeedback one session each week

B

discussion about digestive tract (placebo group)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

4 sessions, one each week, of discussion about anorectal disease

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Biofeedback

4 sessions of biofeedback one session each week

Intervention Type OTHER

Placebo

4 sessions, one each week, of discussion about anorectal disease

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy volunteers between 18 years old and 35 years old
* Right handed\*

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Pace-maker or other metallic piece implanted in the body
* Neurological disease
* Epilepsy
* Digestive disease
* Traumatic delivery
* Anorectal surgery
* Biofeedback
* Psychiatric disease
* Treatment anti-epileptic, hypnotic, psychotropic
* Participation to a previous protocol within 1 month
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Coloplast A/S

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Rouen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Physiology unit

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anne-Marie LEROI, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Rouen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Physiology Unit - Rouen university Hospital

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007- A00652-51

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2007/054/HP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.