TELEmedicine as an Intervention for Sepsis in Emergency Departments

NCT ID: NCT04441944

Last Updated: 2022-11-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1191 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-01

Study Completion Date

2022-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that has doubled in incidence over the past decade, and timely aggressive medical intervention has been shown to save lives. Rural sepsis patients have a 38% higher mortality rate, possibly attributable to delays in early sepsis care. Rural emergency department (ED)-based provider-to-provider telemedicine has been proposed to standardize care and support local clinicians in rural hospitals. The goal of this multicenter observational comparative effectiveness study is to measure the association between tele-ED use and clinical outcomes in a cohort of rural sepsis patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that has doubled in incidence over the past decade, and timely aggressive medical intervention has been shown to save lives. Rural sepsis patients have a 38% higher mortality rate, possibly attributable to delays in early sepsis care. This effect persists even among patients who are transferred between hospitals and who bypass rural hospitals. With 17% of all hospital deaths attributable to sepsis and 19% of Americans living in rural areas, there is a critical need to identify strategies to reduce the disparities in outcomes between rural and urban sepsis care.

Rural ED-based telemedicine has been proposed to standardize care and support local clinicians in rural hospitals. Telemedicine networks provide a real-time, high-definition on-demand video connection between a rural hospital and a tertiary hub 24 h daily. Based in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Avera eCare is a tele-emergency network that serves as a hub for a 140-hospital network that spans 12 rural Midwestern states. It is the largest rural ED-based telehealth network in North America, and a network the investigators have studied previously.

Our central hypothesis is that telemedicine will improve clinical outcomes through improved adherence with Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines. Using comparative effectiveness methods and a patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) approach, this study will test the hypotheses with the following specific aims:

1. To measure the association between rural ED-based telemedicine use, guideline adherence, and clinical outcomes using an observational cohort comparative effectiveness research study. Rural clinicians choose whether individual sepsis patients will be treated with telemedicine-supplemented care. Medical records will be analyzed from patients with severe sepsis who present to 25 rural hospital EDs that are part of a telemedicine network to estimate the effect of telemedicine on changing early SSC guideline adherence. Guideline adherence has been studied extensively as an outcome of sepsis implementation studies. The study will also analyze the impact of telemedicine on clinical outcomes, such as mechanical ventilation, hospital length-of-stay, and survival, using mediation analysis in a propensity-matched cohort design. Our working hypothesis is that telemedicine consultation will improve SSC guideline adherence and will reduce delays in care, leading to improved clinical outcomes.
2. To measure the effect of ED-based telemedicine on guideline adherence among patients who have telemedicine available but not used. In addition to the effect of use for individual patient care, telemedicine interactions may provide ongoing training for providers and nurses and influence care even for patients for whom telemedicine is not used. This effect may result from a learning effect in which local providers adopt practices they observe in telemedicine-consulted patients. The investigators will use hospital fixed-effects models to measure this association. The working hypothesis is that guideline adherence will increase after telemedicine adoption even in non-telemedicine patients, and adherence will be associated with the number of prior telemedicine sepsis encounters (dose-response).

The rationale for this research is that dissemination and implementation of best practices through rural networks remains difficult, but telemedicine offers one potential solution. Sepsis is an ideal model to study the effect of telemedicine because it differs from other acute care conditions treated in rural hospitals (e.g., trauma, myocardial infarction) in that early treatment provided in rural hospitals may be more important than rapid transfer to tertiary centers. Focusing on telemedicine in rural sepsis care will serve as a powerful model for examining strategies for disseminating innovations across rural networks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Telemedicine Cases

Patients presenting to rural emergency departments who had real-time provider-to-provider telemedicine used to supplement their emergency department care.

Telemedicine

Intervention Type OTHER

Use of provider-to-provider telemedicine

Non-Telemedicine Cases

Patients presenting to rural emergency departments who did not have real-time provider-to-provider telemedicine used to supplement their emergency department care.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Telemedicine

Use of provider-to-provider telemedicine

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (age 18 years or older)
* Arrive at participating emergency department between August 1, 2016 and June 30, 2019
* Hospital diagnosis of infection and organ failure
* Identification of infection in the emergency department
* Presence of organ failure in the emergency department (SOFA score of at least 2)
* Presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in the emergency department

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Iowa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicholas M Mohr

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicholas Mohr, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mohr NM, Okoro U, Harland KK, Fuller BM, Campbell K, Swanson MB, Wymore C, Faine B, Zepeski A, Parker EA, Mack L, Bell A, DeJong K, Mueller K, Chrischilles E, Carpenter CR, Wallace K, Jones MP, Ward MM. Outcomes Associated With Rural Emergency Department Provider-to-Provider Telehealth for Sepsis Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;81(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.07.024. Epub 2022 Oct 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36253295 (View on PubMed)

Mohr NM, Harland KK, Okoro UE, Fuller BM, Campbell K, Swanson MB, Simpson SQ, Parker EA, Mack LJ, Bell A, DeJong K, Faine B, Zepeski A, Mueller K, Chrischilles E, Carpenter CR, Jones MP, Ward MM. TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study). J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):77-91. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0141. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33470848 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201901748

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessing Immune Dysfunction in Sepsis
NCT07154615 NOT_YET_RECRUITING