Utility of High-Fidelity Simulation In the Education and Assessment of Residents in the Recognition and Management of the Sepsis Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT01992120

Last Updated: 2015-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of the proposed study will be to determine if a multi-modality teaching curriculum utilizing high-fidelity simulation and didactic lecture will result in sustained improvement by internal medicine residents in written knowledge and clinical performance when compared to residents receiving a curriculum utilizing only didactic lecture. The investigators hypothesis is that the addition of high-fidelity simulation to a traditional didactic lecture curriculum will result in sustained and superior written knowledge and practical performance when compared to a group receiving only didactic lecture on the same topic. Specifically, the investigators will be assessing internal medicine resident knowledge and performance in the area of sepsis in the hospitalized patient, and will shape the investigators teaching curriculum around this focus.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized prospective single-blinded pilot study. Residents from the internal medicine residency program will be assigned a unique number to de-identify them, and then randomized, stratified by post-graduate year (PGY) level, by random number generator to intervention and control groups. Only de-identified information will be used in subsequent analysis, and no individual results will be used. Residents will not know to which group they have been randomized.

Both the intervention and control groups will take a pre-course survey assessing their level of training, area of specialty/interest, and level of confidence in the recognition and management of sepsis.

Both the intervention and control groups will then be put through 2-4 simulated scenarios using high-fidelity simulation. In the intervention group, these scenarios will be sepsis syndrome scenarios. In the control group, non-sepsis scenarios will be administered.

Immediately following the scenarios, a written knowledge quiz focusing on recognition and management of sepsis will be administered to subjects in both groups.

Following the quiz, there will be a debrief session for subjects in both groups of the simulation scenarios, pointing out what was done correctly and what was not.

There will then be a brief didactic teaching session focusing on recognition and management of sepsis administered to subjects in both groups.

2-4 months later, subjects in both groups will be brought back to the simulation lab and tested on a new identical set of simulated sepsis scenarios. This will be videotaped and scored by an impartial volunteer who will score performance according to a check-list of critical actions. Following the simulated scenarios, the written quiz administered at the first visit will be given again. Subjects in both groups will then get debriefed on their performance.

Data can then be compared between the control and intervention group in terms of written and practical performance. Other potential analyses include before and after performance in the intervention group, comparison between the intervention and control groups, as well as subanalysis by PGY level. Student's paired and unpaired t-test will be the model for statistical analysis, and the investigators will utilize a statistician for data analysis.

In developing and implementing a multi-modality sepsis teaching curriculum, and demonstrating its superiority to a didactic-only curriculum, the investigators hope to justify the permanent implementation of a multi-modality teaching module to educate residents (and other healthcare personnel) which will lead to improved recognition and management of sepsis and improved patient outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Medical Knowledge Clinical Performance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Debriefing of high-fidelity sepsis simulation scenarios

First visit:

* Subjects will fill out a self-assessment focusing on perceptions of their knowledge and ability in the recognition and management of sepsis in hospitalized patient
* Subjects will be specifically exposed to high-fidelity simulated sepsis scenarios and be debriefed on their performance in these scenarios (intervention)
* Subjects will take a written test focusing on early recognition and management of sepsis
* Subjects will receive a didactic teaching session focusing on recognition and management of early sepsis in the hospitalized patient

In the second visit:

* Subjects will be exposed to a number of high-fidelity simulated sepsis scenarios and be scored on their performance in management of these scenarios
* Subjects will take a written test of knowledge focusing on early recognition and management of sepsis
* Subjects will then be debriefed specifically on their performance in the simulation scenarios

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Debriefing of high-fidelity sepsis simulation scenarios

Intervention Type OTHER

Educational intervention

Debriefing of high-fidelity non-sepsis simulation scenarios

First visit:

* Subjects will fill out a self-assessment survey of their perceptions of their knowledge and ability in the recognition and management of sepsis in the hospitalized patient
* Subjects will be exposed to high-fidelity simulation scenarios (non-sepsis) and be debriefed in terms of their performance in these scenarios
* Subjects will take a written test of knowledge focusing on early recognition and management of sepsis
* Subjects will receive a didactic teaching session focusing on recognition and management of early sepsis in the hospitalized patient

In the second visit:

* Subjects will be exposed to a number of high-fidelity simulated sepsis scenarios and be scored on their performance in management of the scenarios
* Subjects will take a written test of knowledge focusing on early recognition and management of sepsis
* Subjects will then be debriefed specifically on their performance in the simulation scenarios

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo: Debriefing of high-fidelity non-sepsis simulation scenarios

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Debriefing of high-fidelity sepsis simulation scenarios

Educational intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Placebo: Debriefing of high-fidelity non-sepsis simulation scenarios

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Education High-fidelity simulation Debriefing

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* English-speaking internal medicine resident trainees
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

NYU Langone Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Harbor Simulation Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VA01419

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id