Sepsis Alert Routine Implementation in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT07020598

Last Updated: 2025-06-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

3389 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the impact of a structured sepsis alert routine, that has been implemented in the Emergency Department (ED) of Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Sweden. Using a retrospective cohort design, it compares patient outcomes before and after implementation of the routine. The main aim is to assess whether the sepsis alert system improves 28-day mortality among patients with suspected sepsis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition associated with high morbidity and mortality, affecting millions of people globally each year. Timely recognition and early initiation of treatment are critical for improving outcomes. In response to this need, a structured sepsis alert routine was introduced in October 2017 at the Emergency Department (ED) of Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, a large tertiary care hospital in Stockholm, Sweden.

The sepsis alert routine was designed to identify patients at risk of sepsis early in their ED visit, using predefined triage criteria. The alert was triggered by ED nurses based on suspected infection and specific triage parameters using the RETTS system (Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System). Patients with triage priority 1, or triage priority 2-3 combined with a blood lactate level of \>3.2 mmol/L, were eligible. Once activated, a multidisciplinary response team-including physicians from the ED, Infectious Diseases, and Intensive Care Unit-was rapidly assembled to coordinate patient assessment and initiate early, protocolized sepsis care, including prompt antibiotic treatment and fluid resuscitation. The response followed a standardized checklist aligned with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines.

This study evaluates the clinical impact of the sepsis alert routine by comparing outcomes before and after its implementation. It uses a retrospective, observational cohort design with two data collection periods: a 2-year control period before the intervention (October 2015 - September 2017) and a 2.25-year period during which the sepsis alert was active (October 2017 - December 2019). All patients included were ≥18 years of age, admitted to hospital from the ED with suspected bacterial infection (defined by antibiotic therapy initiated within 48 hours and continued for at least 96 hours or until death, discharge, or ICU transfer), and met sepsis alert criteria.

To assess the effectiveness of the intervention, the primary outcome is 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include 90-day mortality, time to antibiotic administration, and length of hospital stay. Multivariable logistic regression will be used to analyze the full study population, with the intervention period (pre vs. post-implementation) as the main exposure variable, adjusting for covariates including sex, age, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index), SOFA score, triage priority, infection focus, body temperature, and do-not-resuscitate orders.

To further reduce confounding by indication, a propensity score matching analysis will be performed comparing patients who triggered the sepsis alert with matched historical controls. Propensity scores will be estimated using a logistic regression model including the aforementioned covariates as well as bacteremia status. Balance diagnostics and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to evaluate and account for any residual imbalances. Time-to-event outcomes will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

This study will contribute important real-world data on the implementation of a sepsis alert system in a high-volume academic ED setting, and its potential to improve sepsis care and reduce mortality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 years
* Admitted to hospital via the Emergency Department
* Fulfillment of sepsis alert triage criteria (per RETTS system)
* Antibiotic therapy initiated within 48 hours and continued ≥96 hours or until death/discharge/ICU transfer, as marker for suspected bacterial infection

Exclusion Criteria

* Readmission within 28 days of a previous eligible admission
* No antimicrobial treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Region Stockholm

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kristoffer Strålin

Associate Professor, Senior Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K 2017-2778

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2017/1358-31

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ED Tracking Sheet Implementation
NCT05213923 COMPLETED NA
Comparison of Sepsis Prediction Algorithms
NCT05943938 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Early Prediction of Sepsis
NCT04570618 COMPLETED NA