Triage Score VS Quick-Sofa Score in Septic Patients in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT04913246

Last Updated: 2023-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

430 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-01

Study Completion Date

2019-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sepsis represents by its frequency, its morbidity and mortality and its cost to society a major public health issue with a constantly increasing incidence. It affects millions of people around the world each year and is the 2nd leading cause of death in intensive care units.

The incidence of sepsis has been estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO), based on US data, at 15 to 19 million cases of sepsis per year worldwide.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a descriptive, mono-center study aimed at comparing a local triage score with that of qsofa in patients presenting to the Sahloul Emergency Department with sepsis.

A local triage score was calculated for each patient consulting the emergency room; this score makes it possible to classify patients according to severity and to predict the time to treatment.

A form is completed prospectively for each patient admitted to the observation unit whose diagnosis of sepsis is confirmed and validated by a senior during the morning staff.

The validated data were included in the ReSSUS register (Sepsis Register of the Sahloul Emergency Department). This is an observational database on the management of sepsis admitted to the emergency department in Sahloul. It ensures a high level of confidentiality and protection of medical data.

Subsequent follow-up of patients was done by telephone contact to verify mortality at one month and one year.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Emergencies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>18 years old
* each patient diagnosed as an acute Sepsi consulting the emergencies of CHU Sahloul, Sousse

Exclusion Criteria

* no exclusion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hôpital Universitaire Sahloul

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Riadh Boukef

PROFESSOR

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Riadh Boukef, professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Sahloul, Sousse, Tunisia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Triage-Sepsis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Sepsis Prediction Algorithms
NCT05943938 NOT_YET_RECRUITING