REDS SCORE VERSUS qSOFA SCORE to Predict Mortality in Patients With Suspected Sepsis

NCT ID: NCT07271329

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-31

Study Completion Date

2026-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our goal in this work is to compare the predictive accuracy of the REDS score versus qSOFA in identifying in-hospital mortality among ED patients with suspected sepsis and improving outcomes in ED patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sepsis is a life threatening condition and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in emergency department worldwide.Patients at high-risk of death may be identified by using an evidence based risk-stratification score. The ED is a busy and hard environment and any score that is used should be easy to calculate using readily available variables. The objective criteria defining sepsis, a minimum two-point increase as in qSoFA score .

The REDS (Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis) score is a tool used to assess the risk of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. It combines several factors including age, altered mental state, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, serum albumin, INR, lactate levels, and refractory hypotension. A score of 3 or more is considered high-risk. Our goal in this work is to compare the predictive accuracy of the REDS score versus qSOFA in identifying in-hospital mortality among ED patients with suspected sepsis and improving outcomes in ED patients.

The REDS score includes the following variables, each assigned a point value:

Age: ≥ 65 years old (1 point) Altered Mental State: (1 point) Respiratory Rate: ≥ 22 breaths/min (1 point) Systolic Blood Pressure: ≤ 100 mm Hg (1 point) Serum Albumin: ≤ 27 g/L (1 point) INR: ≥ 1.3 (1 point) Lactate: 2.1-3.9 mmol/L (1 point), ≥ 4 mmol/L (3 points) Refractory Hypotension: (2 points for lactate ≤ 2 mmol/L, 3 points for lactate \>2 mmol/L)

Interpreting the REDS score:

0-2: Low risk of death 3 or more: High risk of death The REDS score is a useful tool for emergency departments to quickly identify patients who may be at higher risk of mortality from sepsis and need more aggressive or immediate treatment.The quick SOFA (qSOFA) score is a bedside tool used to quickly assess the risk of death or prolonged intensive care unit stay in patients with suspected infection. It uses three criteria: respiratory rate, altered mental status, and systolic blood pressure. A score of 2 or more indicates a higher risk.

qSOFA Criteria:

1. Respiratory Rate: 22 breaths per minute or higher.
2. Altered Mental Status: A Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 15.
3. Systolic Blood Pressure: 100 mmHg or lower.

Scoring:

Each criterion met scores 1 point. A score of 2 or more indicates a higher risk of poor outcome. qSOFA helps identify patients with suspected infection who are likely to have sepsis. It is a rapid assessment tool that can be used in urgent and resource-limited settings

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis in ED Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups: 1) Group A 2)Group B

Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups:

1. Group A: Initial vital signs upon arrival at ED triage to evaluate the REDS score \[ Time Frame: Timepoint 0 (ED triage) Age: ≥ 65 years old (1 point) Altered Mental State: (1 point) \[from 1-15\] Respiratory Rate: ≥22 breaths/min (1point ) \[yes or not\] Systolic Blood Pressure: ≤100 mm Hg (1 point) \[yes or not\] Serum Albumin: ≤27 g/L (1 point) \[yes or not\] INR: ≥1.3 (1 point)\[yes or not\] Lactate: 2.1-3.9 mmol/L (1 point), ≥4 mmol/L (3 points) Refractory Hypotension: (2 points for lactate ≤2 mmol/L, 3 points for lactate \>2 mmol/L) will be assessed to evaluate the REDS score.
2. Group B: Initial vital signs upon arrival at ED triage to evaluate the qSOFA score \[ Time Frame: Timepoint 0 (ED triage) \] .

* Respiratory rate per minute
* Mental status
* Systolic blood pressure.

Sphygmomanometer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Mercury sphygmomanometer for measuring blood pressure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sphygmomanometer

Mercury sphygmomanometer for measuring blood pressure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults ≥ 18 y presented to the ED with suspected or confirmed infection, both sex qSOFA criterion met on arrival ≥ 2

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient less than 18 years Incomplete vital sign records upon ED arrival Pregnant patients Those with DNR state Immune compromised patient as leukemia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

MN MohamedHussin

Resident at Emergency Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed Anwar, Consultant of Anathesia ICU

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

Haitham Mohammed Ahmed, Lecturer of Anesthesia,ICU

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assiut University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut

Asyut, Abo Tig, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mostafa Nageh mohamed, M.B.B. Ch

Role: CONTACT

+01119618014

Bassant said Mousa Associate Prof of Emergency department Faculty of medicine, Study Principal Investigator

Role: CONTACT

01227062927

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Reds score versus qSOFA score

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.