REDS SCORE VERSUS qSOFA SCORE to Predict Mortality in Patients With Suspected Sepsis
NCT ID: NCT07271329
Last Updated: 2025-12-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-12-31
2026-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prognostic Accuracy of qSOFA, SIRS, and EWSs for In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department
NCT05172479
Triage Score VS Quick-Sofa Score in Septic Patients in the Emergency Department
NCT04913246
Implementation of a qSOFA Score in the Emergency Department
NCT04568746
Delta qSOFA for Risk Stratification in Emergency Infected Patients
NCT02926664
Comparison to Early Detect of the Sepsis
NCT05107297
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The REDS (Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis) score is a tool used to assess the risk of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. It combines several factors including age, altered mental state, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, serum albumin, INR, lactate levels, and refractory hypotension. A score of 3 or more is considered high-risk. Our goal in this work is to compare the predictive accuracy of the REDS score versus qSOFA in identifying in-hospital mortality among ED patients with suspected sepsis and improving outcomes in ED patients.
The REDS score includes the following variables, each assigned a point value:
Age: ≥ 65 years old (1 point) Altered Mental State: (1 point) Respiratory Rate: ≥ 22 breaths/min (1 point) Systolic Blood Pressure: ≤ 100 mm Hg (1 point) Serum Albumin: ≤ 27 g/L (1 point) INR: ≥ 1.3 (1 point) Lactate: 2.1-3.9 mmol/L (1 point), ≥ 4 mmol/L (3 points) Refractory Hypotension: (2 points for lactate ≤ 2 mmol/L, 3 points for lactate \>2 mmol/L)
Interpreting the REDS score:
0-2: Low risk of death 3 or more: High risk of death The REDS score is a useful tool for emergency departments to quickly identify patients who may be at higher risk of mortality from sepsis and need more aggressive or immediate treatment.The quick SOFA (qSOFA) score is a bedside tool used to quickly assess the risk of death or prolonged intensive care unit stay in patients with suspected infection. It uses three criteria: respiratory rate, altered mental status, and systolic blood pressure. A score of 2 or more indicates a higher risk.
qSOFA Criteria:
1. Respiratory Rate: 22 breaths per minute or higher.
2. Altered Mental Status: A Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 15.
3. Systolic Blood Pressure: 100 mmHg or lower.
Scoring:
Each criterion met scores 1 point. A score of 2 or more indicates a higher risk of poor outcome. qSOFA helps identify patients with suspected infection who are likely to have sepsis. It is a rapid assessment tool that can be used in urgent and resource-limited settings
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups: 1) Group A 2)Group B
Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups:
1. Group A: Initial vital signs upon arrival at ED triage to evaluate the REDS score \[ Time Frame: Timepoint 0 (ED triage) Age: ≥ 65 years old (1 point) Altered Mental State: (1 point) \[from 1-15\] Respiratory Rate: ≥22 breaths/min (1point ) \[yes or not\] Systolic Blood Pressure: ≤100 mm Hg (1 point) \[yes or not\] Serum Albumin: ≤27 g/L (1 point) \[yes or not\] INR: ≥1.3 (1 point)\[yes or not\] Lactate: 2.1-3.9 mmol/L (1 point), ≥4 mmol/L (3 points) Refractory Hypotension: (2 points for lactate ≤2 mmol/L, 3 points for lactate \>2 mmol/L) will be assessed to evaluate the REDS score.
2. Group B: Initial vital signs upon arrival at ED triage to evaluate the qSOFA score \[ Time Frame: Timepoint 0 (ED triage) \] .
* Respiratory rate per minute
* Mental status
* Systolic blood pressure.
Sphygmomanometer
Mercury sphygmomanometer for measuring blood pressure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sphygmomanometer
Mercury sphygmomanometer for measuring blood pressure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
MN MohamedHussin
Resident at Emergency Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed Anwar, Consultant of Anathesia ICU
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Haitham Mohammed Ahmed, Lecturer of Anesthesia,ICU
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut
Asyut, Abo Tig, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Bassant said Mousa Associate Prof of Emergency department Faculty of medicine, Study Principal Investigator
Role: CONTACT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Reds score versus qSOFA score
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.