Assessment of qSOFA in the Latin America Sepsis Institute Database

NCT ID: NCT03158493

Last Updated: 2017-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

8435 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Recently, the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) have published new definitions of sepsis, known as Sepsis 3, based on a fairly robust analysis of large, essentially American, databases. In addition to the new definition, a new screening score was suggested, named quickSOFA (qSOFA). This score is positive if two of three variables are present: respiratory rate higher than 22 ipm, reduced level of consciousness and systolic blood pressure lower than 100 mmHg. Although the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves suggest an adequate predictive validity for the new score, a lot of controversy around its sensitivity as a screening tool mainly in settings with high mortality rates. Current national Brazilian data show that sepsis mortality in our country, especially in public hospitals from the Unified Health System (SUS), is very high and well above world mortality. The impact of using the qSOFA in these settings is not known. In this context, the present study aims to evaluate the potential impact of using qSOFA as a screening tool in Brazilian private and public institutions. The hypothesis is that the use of qSOFA as a screening tool will have a low sensitivity. As a consequence, patients with the diagnosis of sepsis, with organ dysfunction, will not be detected by this tool. The hypothesis was also that those patients with a qSOFA negative will have a high mortality rate, mainly in Brazilian public hospitals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All hospitals in the Latin America Sepsis Institute network were invited to participate. This is a national based quality improvement initiative aiming to improve compliance with the sepsis bundles and mortality. The hospitals were instructed to include all patients that presented with the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department (ED), wards or ICU. The diagnosis of sepsis was based on the previous criteria used by the network, which means presence of suspected infection and an infection-associated organ dysfunction. Organ dysfunction was defined by the presence of any of the following: systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg or fall in systolic blood pressure\> 40 mmHg; creatinine\> 2.0 mg / dl or diuresis less than 0.5 ml/kg/h in the last 2 hours, bilirubin\> 2mg/dl, platelet count\<100,000, lactate\> 2 mmol/dl (or above the reference value), coagulopathy (RNI\> 1.5 or APTT\>60 sec), PaO2/FiO2 ratio \<300 or recent or increased O2 need to maintain SpO2\> 90. Suspected of infection was based on the clinical suspicious by the attending physician. All patients under end-of-life care and those previously included in the database in the same hospital admission were excluded.

The case managers were instructed to collect the 3 components of the qSOFA criteria, namely reduced level of consciousness, respiratory rate higher than 22 bpm and systolic blood pressure lower than 100 mmHg). In patients included from the ED, these components were checked at the time of triage. In patients in the wards or in the ICU, the 3 components were considered if presented any time in the 24 hours prior to the diagnosis of sepsis.

Outcomes Primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included admission to ICU and length of ICU stay of more than 48 hours. A secondary composite outcome was hospital mortality plus ICU length of stay higher than two days (for those admitted to the ICU).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Suspected source of infection
* Presence of any of the following organ dysfunction

* Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg or fall in systolic blood pressure\> 40 mmHg.
* Creatinine\> 2.0 mg / dl or diuresis less than 0.5 ml/kg/h in the last 2 hours OR
* Bilirubin\> 2mg/dl,
* Platelet count\<100,000,
* Lactate\> 2 mmol/dl (or above the reference value),
* Coagulopathy (RNI\> 1.5 or APTT\>60 sec),
* PaO2/FiO2 ratio \<300 or recent or increased O2 need to maintain SpO2\> 90

Exclusion Criteria

* End of life care
* Previous sepsis episode in the same hospital admission
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Latin America Sepsis Institute

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Federal University of São Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Flavia Ribeiro Machado

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Flavia R Machado, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of São Paulo

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Machado FR, Cavalcanti AB, Monteiro MB, Sousa JL, Bossa A, Bafi AT, Dal-Pizzol F, Freitas FGR, Lisboa T, Westphal GA, Japiassu AM, Azevedo LCP; Instituto Latino-Americano de Sepsis network investigators. Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):789-798. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31910037 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

00691812.3.0000.5505

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.