Impact of the Introduction of a Performance Improvement Program on the Initial Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adults in the Emergency Department: a Before-and-after Study (IPA-SOS)

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-01

Study Completion Date

2026-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate if a performance improvement program can improve the initial management of sepsis and septic shock in adults at Brest University Hospital. The study will include adult patients with positive blood cultures and a positive SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Essessment) score, or with blood cultures collected, a positive SOFA score, and sepsis/septic shock confirmed by the sepsis team at Brest University Hospital.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does the implementation of a performance improvement program increase adherence to the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines?
* Does the program improve patient outcomes, such as 90-day mortality, progression to septic shock, and length of stay in the ICU and hospital?

Researchers will compare patients from two periods : pre-implementation (January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017) and post-implementation (May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2024), to see if the performance improvement program leads to better compliance with SSC guidelines and improved patient outcomes.

Participants will:

* Have their clinical data (such as blood cultures, SOFA scores, and treatment times) collected and analyzed.
* Be monitored for time to antibiotic therapy, initial fluid resuscitation, and other key treatment interventions following the recognition of sepsis or septic shock.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Triage Score VS Quick-Sofa Score in Septic Patients in the Emergency Department

NCT04913246

Sepsis Emergencies

COMPLETED

Shock Indices Use for Early Mortality From Septic Shock

NCT05088109

Septic Shock Morality

UNKNOWN

Comparing Prognostic Performance of SEPSIS 2 and SEPSIS 3 Strategies at the Emergency Service

NCT03355833

Sepsis

COMPLETED

Clinical Intuition for PRedicting Evolution in Sepsis in the Emergency Department - CIPRES-ED Study

NCT04803942

Sepsis

UNKNOWN

A Prospective Observational Study of Sepsis

NCT05309889

Sepsis

UNKNOWN

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sepsis and septic shock are conditions with a significant public health impact, yet the incidence of sepsis continues to rise. To improve the management of these conditions, experts recommend implementing performance improvement programs. These recommendations were applied at Brest University Hospital in 2018, including the creation of a "sepsis team" responsible for prevention, education, and providing guidance and advice on sepsis and septic shock. The team consists of infectious disease specialists, emergency physicians, and critical care doctors.

Due to the heterogeneity of such programs worldwide, it is important to assess the effectiveness of the performance improvement program at Brest University Hospital by evaluating adherence to the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines before and after its implementation.

The study will include adult patients with positive blood cultures and a positive SOFA score, or with blood cultures collected, a positive SOFA score, and sepsis/septic shock confirmed by the sepsis team at Brest University Hospital. Two periods : from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2017 and from 01/05/2022 to 30/04/2024.

The pre- and post-implementation groups will be compared, with the primary outcome being compliance with the 2021 SSC recommendations (antibiotic therapy, hemodynamic management, respiratory support, corticosteroid therapy). Secondary outcomes include time from admission to first physician contact, time from first contact to initiation of antibiotic therapy, time from first contact to first fluid resuscitation, the proportion of sepsis patients progressing to septic shock in the emergency department, length of ICU and hospital stay, 90-day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and changes in SOFA score (at 24 hours, Day 2, and Day 7).

The role of the Initial Orientation Nurse (ION) is integrated into the evaluation criteria. Using a triage grid, sometimes in collaboration with the senior emergency physician or resuscitation physician, the ION determines the optimal time frame for care and the most appropriate treatment pathway. The ION plays a key role in the early recognition of sepsis/septic shock.

The investigators will consider the time from patient evaluation by the ION to assess the speed of activation of the appropriate care pathway and the promptness of sepsis/septic shock management after recognition.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of implementing a performance improvement program on the initial management of sepsis and septic shock in adults in the emergency medicine department of Brest University Hospital, guided by the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Septic Shock Critical Illness Emergency Medicine Surviving Sepsis Campaign Sepsis Performance Improvement Program Sepsis Team

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pre-implementation cohort

Patients from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, before the implementation of the performance improvement program.

No interventions assigned to this group

Post-implementation cohort

Patients from May 1, 2022, to April 30, 2024, after the implementation of the performance improvement program.

Sepsis Performance Improvement Program

Intervention Type OTHER

Training/awareness for medical and paramedical staff; creation of informational posters; development of an institutional pathway in the emergency department; creation of a protocol ; establishment of a sepsis team with a dedicated contact number.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sepsis Performance Improvement Program

Training/awareness for medical and paramedical staff; creation of informational posters; development of an institutional pathway in the emergency department; creation of a protocol ; establishment of a sepsis team with a dedicated contact number.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Implementation of a Performance Improvement Program Performance Improvement Program

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Major
* Patients with positive blood cultures and a positive SOFA score
* Patients with blood cultures collected, a positive SOFA score, and sepsis/septic shock confirmed by the sepsis team at Brest University Hospital.
* Patients enrolled in a social security scheme