An Institutional Audit of the Short Term Complications and Long Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vault/cervical Prolapse.

NCT ID: NCT04378400

Last Updated: 2025-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-29

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

An institutional audit of the short term complications and long term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vault/cervical prolapse.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to audit the outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy procedures done in our unit. The investigators aim to permanently monitor outcomes of this procedure correcting vaginal vault prolapse or cervical descent. Auditing institutional performance with pelvic floor procedures is increasingly being required by (inter)national societies in pelvic floor medicine, so that patients can be counseled on outcomes they can expect at a given institution.

Sacrocolpopexy is offered to patients with symptomatic prolapse (≥stage II) of the vaginal apex (vault or cervix). The procedure involves dissection of the promontory and the vaginal vault, suturing of two meshes to the anterior and posterior aspect of the vagina using minimally three rows of sutures on each side, and one row at the apex. Thereafter the mesh is fixed with staples to the promontory and the peritoneum closed, with staples and a running suture.

The investigators started auditing this procedure 20 years ago because of the conversion to laparoscopy.

High anatomical and subjective cure rates are reported on the medium term (range 12-60 months), though long-term data (60 months or longer) are scarce and most studies focus on anatomical outcomes.4 The investigators recently published medium term outcomes of patients operated up to 2014 1. Now the aim is to extend this audit to patients operated since 2014 and install a process of permanent monitoring our performance with this operation. The investigators also want to use the availability of outcomes in large numbers and/or the long term, to detect potential rare or long term complications, and study the effects of small technical increments such as extending dissections, associate other pelvic floor reconstructive procedures or the change in bio-materials used for this operation. All these may affect outcome.

Primary outcome is a subjective outcome, using a patient-centered approach and report patient reported out-comes. Additional outcomes such as anatomical failure, or complications, both by occurrence and time point, re-interventions, and pelvic floor functional outcomes are secondary outcomes that allows the investigators to benchmark their performance to previous studies and other series. Key in an objective assessment process is that patients are examined by an experienced clinician not involved in the management, which will also be used herein.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vault Prolapse, Vaginal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sacrocolpopexy

Sacrocolpopexy is offered to patients with symptomatic prolapse (≥stage II) of the vaginal apex (vault or cervix). The procedure involves dissection of the promontory and the vaginal vault, suturing of two meshes to the anterior and posterior aspect of the vagina using minimally three rows of sutures on each side, and one row at the apex. Thereafter the mesh is fixed with staples to the promontory and the peritoneum closed, with staples and a running suture.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Having undergone laparoscopic sacrocolpoexy at our unit.
2. Agreeing to participate in the study, including completion of study-related procedures, evaluations and questionnaires, and giving informed consent.
3. Follow up period of at least 6 months since the operation.

Exclusion Criteria

None apart from not meeting the above criteria
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

prof. dr. Jan Deprest

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UZ Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Page AS, Cattani L, Pacquee S, Claerhout F, Callewaert G, Housmans S, Van der Aa F, D'Hoore A, Deprest J. Long-term Data on Graft-Related Complications After Sacrocolpopexy With Lightweight Compared With Heavier-Weight Mesh. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):189-198. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005021. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36701619 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S63523

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Avaulta Versus Anterior Repair
NCT00627549 UNKNOWN NA
Anterior Vaginal Wall Reconstruction
NCT00571350 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2