An Institutional Audit of the Short Term Complications and Long Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vault/cervical Prolapse.
NCT ID: NCT04378400
Last Updated: 2025-01-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-09-29
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment
NCT04878146
Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Sacropolpopexy
NCT04332315
Multicenter Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Registry Collaborative
NCT05918367
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
NCT02272361
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sacrocolpopexy is offered to patients with symptomatic prolapse (≥stage II) of the vaginal apex (vault or cervix). The procedure involves dissection of the promontory and the vaginal vault, suturing of two meshes to the anterior and posterior aspect of the vagina using minimally three rows of sutures on each side, and one row at the apex. Thereafter the mesh is fixed with staples to the promontory and the peritoneum closed, with staples and a running suture.
The investigators started auditing this procedure 20 years ago because of the conversion to laparoscopy.
High anatomical and subjective cure rates are reported on the medium term (range 12-60 months), though long-term data (60 months or longer) are scarce and most studies focus on anatomical outcomes.4 The investigators recently published medium term outcomes of patients operated up to 2014 1. Now the aim is to extend this audit to patients operated since 2014 and install a process of permanent monitoring our performance with this operation. The investigators also want to use the availability of outcomes in large numbers and/or the long term, to detect potential rare or long term complications, and study the effects of small technical increments such as extending dissections, associate other pelvic floor reconstructive procedures or the change in bio-materials used for this operation. All these may affect outcome.
Primary outcome is a subjective outcome, using a patient-centered approach and report patient reported out-comes. Additional outcomes such as anatomical failure, or complications, both by occurrence and time point, re-interventions, and pelvic floor functional outcomes are secondary outcomes that allows the investigators to benchmark their performance to previous studies and other series. Key in an objective assessment process is that patients are examined by an experienced clinician not involved in the management, which will also be used herein.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sacrocolpopexy
Sacrocolpopexy is offered to patients with symptomatic prolapse (≥stage II) of the vaginal apex (vault or cervix). The procedure involves dissection of the promontory and the vaginal vault, suturing of two meshes to the anterior and posterior aspect of the vagina using minimally three rows of sutures on each side, and one row at the apex. Thereafter the mesh is fixed with staples to the promontory and the peritoneum closed, with staples and a running suture.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Agreeing to participate in the study, including completion of study-related procedures, evaluations and questionnaires, and giving informed consent.
3. Follow up period of at least 6 months since the operation.
Exclusion Criteria
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
prof. dr. Jan Deprest
MD, PhD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UZ Leuven
Leuven, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Page AS, Cattani L, Pacquee S, Claerhout F, Callewaert G, Housmans S, Van der Aa F, D'Hoore A, Deprest J. Long-term Data on Graft-Related Complications After Sacrocolpopexy With Lightweight Compared With Heavier-Weight Mesh. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):189-198. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005021. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S63523
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.