Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT ID: NCT00551993
Last Updated: 2014-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-09-30
2011-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpexy Versus Lateral Suspension
NCT03582852
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441
A Study of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy Using Alyte Mesh
NCT01320644
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Robotic assisted LscASC will be performed using the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in a similar manner as that described above for conventional laparoscopy. Data points recorded during the procedure will include: operating room time of entry and exit, time from incision to closure and time taken for the suturing aspect of the case. From this information, the operating room costs and anesthesia costs, i.e., the amount that a provider must pay for goods or services, will be calculated. Estimated blood loss, perioperative and post-operative complications, and number of days in the hospital will be studied as will cost-effectiveness and impact on HRQOL
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
2
Robotic Sacral Colpopexy
robotic laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Da Vinci Robot
1
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
Standard laparoscopy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
robotic laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Da Vinci Robot
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
Standard laparoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Status post hysterectomy with apical vaginal prolapse POPQ stages II-IV (prolapse from 1cm proximal to the hymen to all points distal) that desire laparoscopic surgical management.
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to consent
* History of prior sacralcolpopexy
* Suspicious adnexal masses or other factors that may indicate pelvic malignancy
* History of pelvic inflammatory disease
* Morbid obesity (body mass index greater than or equal to 40)
* History of prior or need for concomitant rectopexy with sigmoid resection.
21 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marie Fidela M Paraiso, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Cleveland Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Paraiso MFR, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CCG, Barber MD. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;118(5):1005-1013. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231537c.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-652
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.