Trial to Determine Which of Two Surgical Techniques Works Better to Correct Vaginal Bulging
NCT ID: NCT00988975
Last Updated: 2009-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-09-30
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00551993
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpexy Versus Lateral Suspension
NCT03582852
Comparison of 2 Lightweight Y-meshes After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02248935
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment
NCT04878146
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Acellular Collagen Biomesh (Pelvisoft) to Polypropylene Mesh(Pelvitex) for Sacral Colpopexy
NCT00564083
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pelvicol graft
Insertion of pelvicol graft
Pelvicol graft
No graft material
No graft material
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Insertion of pelvicol graft
Pelvicol graft
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* allergy to pork
* any contraindication to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Urogynecology Associates, Indiana
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Urogynecology Associates
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clarian North
Carmel, Indiana, United States
Clarian Methodist
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-046
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.