Surgical Intervention With DermaPure vs Native Tissue in Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT ID: NCT03939715
Last Updated: 2020-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-04-05
2022-05-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Axis(TM) Solvent-dehydrate Dermal Allograft in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT06263985
Prospective Performance Analysis of the Exair(TM) Prolapse Repair System in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03271294
Native Tissue Repair in Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Long-term Results and Risk of Re-operation
NCT06744972
Smartmesh Technology in Pelvic Floor Repair Procedures
NCT03098641
Vaginal Native Tissues Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03875989
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives
Specific Aim #1:
To determine the relative safety and efficacy of anterior and multi-compartment vaginal wall prolapse repair augmented with decellularized human dermal allograft (DermaPure®) versus anterior and multi-compartment repair employing native tissue.
Specific Aim #2:
To evaluate bulge symptoms, quality of life, sexual function, and patient satisfaction
Our hypothesis is that pelvic organ prolapse repair augmented with DermaPure® will provide superior anatomic outcomes as compared to native tissue controls with a non-inferior safety profile.
Endpoints
Safety Endpoint #1:
The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related SAE's at 12 months.
Safety Endpoint #2:
The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related AE's of interest at 12 months, which include:
* Vaginal shortening
* Vaginal scarring or banding
* De novo vaginal bleeding
* Atypical vaginal discharge
* Fistula formation
* De novo dyspareunia
* Pelvic pain
* Peri-operative infection
* Vaginal infection
* UTI
* Neuromuscular disorder
* SUI (worsening or de novo)
* UUI (worsening or de novo)
* Difficulty emptying bladder (worsening or de novo)
* Graft exposure (into vagina)
* Graft erosion (into viscus)
Efficacy Endpoint #1:
The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months with prolapse of the target compartment beyond the hymen.
Efficacy Endpoint #2:
The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months with bulge symptoms attributable to the target compartment as determined by PFDI-20 question number 3 ("Does the participant usually have a bulge or something falling out that the participant can see or feel in the vaginal area") answering "yes" and \>= 2 (responses of "somewhat", "moderately", or "quite a bit"). (Barber)
Efficacy Endpoint #3:
The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months requiring re-treatment for recurrent prolapse of the target compartment (to include surgery, physical therapy or pessary insertion).
Efficacy Endpoint #4:
Change in quality of life in each group from baseline to 36 months as measured by the PFDI-20 and the PFIQ-7. (Barber)
Efficacy Endpoint #5:
Change in sexual function in each group from baseline to 36 months as measured by the PISQ-IR. (Rogers)
Efficacy Endpoint #6:
Patient satisfaction in each group at 36 months as measured by the SSQ-8. (Haff)
Efficacy Endpoint #7:
Patient impression in each group at 36 months of postoperative improvement by the PGI-I (Srikrishna)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DermaPure
DermaPure®
Surgical intervention using DermaPure®
Native Tissue
native tissue
Surgical intervention using native tissue
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DermaPure®
Surgical intervention using DermaPure®
native tissue
Surgical intervention using native tissue
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject is at least 18 years of age
* Subject has prolapse of the anterior compartment beyond the hymen
* Subject reports bulge symptoms as defined in question 3 of the PFDI-20 with a response of 2 or higher ("somewhat", "moderately" or "quite a bit")
* Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent
* Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up protocol through 36 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject has untreated severe urogenital atrophy
* Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, untreated urinary tract infection (UTI), or tissue necrosis
* Subject has a history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical)
* Subject has had prior pelvic radiation therapy
* Subject has taken systemic steroids within the last month, or immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment within the last 3 months (list attached)
* Subject has a history of poor wound healing with or without a diagnosis of connective tissue disease
* Subject has chronic systemic pain that includes the pelvic area or chronic focal pain that involves the pelvis
* Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) as defined by a hemoglobin A1C \< or = to 8% (Underwood, Ata)
* Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition that may effect of currently affects bladder function
* Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (colpocleisis)
* Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position
* Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another pelvic organ prolapse related study during this study
* Subject has had previous prolapse repair with synthetic mesh in the anterior compartment
* Subject is planning to undergo a concomitant prolapse repair in a non-target compartment with anything other than native tissue or DermaPure®
* Subject is unable to be treated in the anterior compartment with DermaPure®
* Subject is desirous of a concomitant hysteropexy
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tissue Regenix Ltd
INDUSTRY
Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James Lukban, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
CATHERINE JAY
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1385925-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.