Examining Prison Inmates' Attitudes and Internal Emotional States

NCT ID: NCT04374357

Last Updated: 2020-06-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

103 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-20

Study Completion Date

2017-11-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is the first part of a two-tiered research project to propose a novel approach-forgiveness therapy-to corrections. This study is a non-intervention study and aims to demonstrate the need to introduce the concepts of forgiveness and Forgiveness Therapy within prisons. This study is focused on the extent to which men in a maximum-security prison experienced considerable injustice against them (such as in a family context as he was growing up) prior to committing serious crimes. Variables associated with this prior unjust treatment included the level of forgiveness and variables of current psychological well-being. Since this study provided the rationale and participants' matching data (eligibility) for the subsequent interventional study (Study 2, "Proposing Forgiveness Therapy in Prison") in which psychological treatments applied to the inmates, investigator refer to this study as Study 1.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current study (Study 1) consisted of 103 men in a maximum-security prison in the Midwestern United States. The research aimed to demonstrate the necessity of introducing forgiveness concepts and Forgiveness Therapy within the prison. This study collected percentage and correlational data regarding the presence of hurtful unfair treatments and psychological compromises, recognizing the style of the story-recalling (e.g. repetitive angry retelling; focus on damage; focus on fear; focus on despair, and so forth), rating of the injury types, and severity and age of occurrence. Inmates' stories were coded and analyzed by up to five researchers. The first wave of data examined a) whether participants have been treated deeply unfairly prior to their crime and imprisonment and the degree of severity; b) the degree to which the participants' show both excessive anger and unforgiveness toward those who acted unjustly as well as their expressions in crimes-direct contribution to their choice of harming the innocent; and c) the relationship among the excessive anger, forgiveness, and related emotional sufferings and psychological distresses such as anxiety and depression. Case studies were also conducted. Reliability and validation of 30-Item Enright forgiveness inventory (EFI-30) in the prison context were also tested. In general, we tested the following hypotheses:

1. Do most inmates in this maximum-security prison experience severe unfair treatment against them before their criminal perpetrations?
2. Do most inmates in this maximum-security prison have low forgiveness towards the person who deeply hurt them?
3. Do disproportional number of inmates in this maximum-security prison have clinical compromises (e.g. excessive anger, anxiety, and depression) related to their past injustice?
4. Does higher degree of anger/anxiety in inmates correlates to the less forgiving behavior towards those who hurt them in the past, prior to their crime?

Study 1 also provided participant matching data (criteria for eligible participants) for the Forgiveness Therapy experiments of subsequent interevtional study

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Forgiveness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male prison inmates, who have never participated in forgiveness therapies, were recruited voluntarily from a maximum-security prison in Wisconsin, United States.

Exclusion Criteria

* have participated in forgiveness workshops
* are not from maximum security prison
* female; (due to the all-male prison context)
* are illiterate (cannot write their stories and finish the scales)
* have been diagnosed with cognitive disorders or cognitive function impairment
* receive one-on-one treatment with the psychologist in prison
Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Department of Corrections, State of Wisconsin

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert D Enright, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia Correctional Institution

Portage, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Erzar T, Yu L, Enright RD, Kompan Erzar K. Childhood Victimization, Recent Injustice, Anger, and Forgiveness in a Sample of Imprisoned Male Offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019 Jan;63(1):18-31. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18781782. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29926759 (View on PubMed)

Lee YR, Enright RD. A Forgiveness Intervention for Women With Fibromyalgia Who Were Abused in Childhood: A Pilot Study. Spiritual Clin Pract (Wash D C ). 2014 Sep;1(3):203-217. doi: 10.1037/scp0000025. Epub 2014 Aug 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25914886 (View on PubMed)

Waltman MA, Russell DC, Coyle CT, Enright RD, Holter AC, M Swoboda C. The effects of a forgiveness intervention on patients with coronary artery disease. Psychol Health. 2009 Jan;24(1):11-27. doi: 10.1080/08870440903126371.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20186637 (View on PubMed)

Hansen MJ, Enright RD, Baskin TW, Klatt J. A palliative care intervention in forgiveness therapy for elderly terminally ill cancer patients. J Palliat Care. 2009 Spring;25(1):51-60.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19445342 (View on PubMed)

Reed GL, Enright RD. The effects of forgiveness therapy on depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress for women after spousal emotional abuse. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct;74(5):920-9. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.920.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17032096 (View on PubMed)

Lin WF, Mack D, Enright RD, Krahn D, Baskin TW. Effects of forgiveness therapy on anger, mood, and vulnerability to substance use among inpatient substance-dependent clients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Dec;72(6):1114-21. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1114.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15612857 (View on PubMed)

McKay KM, Hill MS, Freedman SR, Enright RD. Towards a feminist empowerment model of forgiveness psychotherapy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2007 Mar;44(1):14-29. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.44.1.14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22122165 (View on PubMed)

Yu, L., Gambaro, M., Komoski, M. C., Song, M. J., Song, M., Teslik, M., Wollner, B., & Enright, R. D. (2018). The Silent Injustices against Men in Maximum Security Prison and the Need for Forgiveness Therapy: Two Case Studies. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3, 137. DOI: 10.4172/2475-319X.1000137.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Enright, R. D., Erzar, T., Gambaro, M., Komoski, M. C., O'Boyle, J., Reed, G., & ... Yu, L. (2016). Proposing Forgiveness Therapy for those in Prison: An Intervention Strategy for Reducing Anger and Promoting Psychological Health. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 1, 116. DOI: 10.4172/2475-319X.1000116.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A173000

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EDUC/EDUC PSYCH

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2016-0593

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Core Competency Model for Corrections
NCT06359574 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA