Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: An Emerging Model of Service Delivery
NCT ID: NCT01313052
Last Updated: 2017-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
53 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-05-31
2014-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypotheses are:
1. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in promoting treatment adherence among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
2. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in preventing arrest, incarceration, emergency department and inpatient hospital use among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Trial of a Supporter-Targeted Intervention to Improve Outcomes in Recent Sexual Assault Survivors
NCT05345405
The Effectiveness of Forensic Outpatient Systemic Therapy: a Multiple Case Experimental Design
NCT06032520
The Added Value of an Internet-based Intervention for Treatment of Forensic Psychiatric Outpatients
NCT05711342
The Effectiveness of Blended Forensic Ambulant Systemic Therapy
NCT05606978
Effectiveness of an Adaptive Treatment Model for At-risk Family Caregivers
NCT00632684
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The FACT model (ACT + legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring) will be compared to enhanced outpatient treatment (close outpatient follow-up without judicial monitoring). Seventy adults with psychotic disorders in Monroe County who are convicted of a misdemeanor will be randomly assigned to each treatment group and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes will include criminal justice and mental health service utilization rates, treatment adherence, psychiatric symptoms, substance abuse, and homelessness. Service utilization outcomes will be tracked using established mental health and criminal justice databases.
Hypotheses are:
1. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in promoting treatment adherence among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
2. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in preventing arrest, incarceration, emergency department and inpatient hospital use among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT)
Individuals in this arm will receive the services of an Assertive Community Treatment team and close supervision of a judge trained in the FACT model.
Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT)
Individuals in this arm will receive the services of an Assertive Community Treatment team and close supervision of a judge trained in the FACT model.
Enhanced Treatment as Usual
Individuals in this arm of the study will receive an expedited appointment at a clinic specializing in the treatment of psychotic disorders. These individuals will receive the services of a therapist, psychiatrist, and case manager.
Enhanced Treatment as Usual
Individuals in this arm of the study will receive an expedited appointment at a clinic specializing in the treatment of psychotic disorders. These individuals will receive the services of a therapist, psychiatrist, and case manager.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT)
Individuals in this arm will receive the services of an Assertive Community Treatment team and close supervision of a judge trained in the FACT model.
Enhanced Treatment as Usual
Individuals in this arm of the study will receive an expedited appointment at a clinic specializing in the treatment of psychotic disorders. These individuals will receive the services of a therapist, psychiatrist, and case manager.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Individuals currently facing misdemeanor or violation charges who have not yet been sentenced.
Exclusion Criteria
* Individuals currently facing felony charges
* Individuals currently involved in any type of legal leverage including probation, parole, drug or mental health court supervision, Assisted Outpatient Treatment, or Criminal Procedure Law status.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
University of Rochester
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Steven Lamberti
Professor, Department of Psychiatry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
J Steven Lamberti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Rochester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Monroe County Jail
Rochester, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lamberti JS, Deem A, Weisman RL, LaDuke C. The role of probation in forensic assertive community treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Apr;62(4):418-21. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0418.
Lamberti, J., & Weisman, R. (2010). Forensic assertive community treatment: Origins, current practice, and future directions. In H. Dlugacz (Ed.), Reentry Planning for Offenders With Mental Disorders (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 145-169). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
Lamberti, JS. (2011). Legal Leverage in the Treatment of Adults With Severe Mental Illness, in Workplace Violence in Mental Health and General Health Care Settings. Pages 225 - 236. M. Privitera, editor. Jones and Bartlett, Pages 225-236.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.