Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: An Emerging Model of Service Delivery

NCT ID: NCT01313052

Last Updated: 2017-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-05-31

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The FACT model (ACT + legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring) will be compared to enhanced outpatient treatment (close outpatient follow-up without judicial monitoring). Seventy adults with psychotic disorders in Monroe County who are convicted of a misdemeanor will be randomly assigned to each treatment group and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes will include criminal justice and mental health service utilization rates, treatment adherence, psychiatric symptoms, substance abuse, homelessness, perceived coercion, and consumer satisfaction. Service utilization outcomes will be tracked using established mental health and criminal justice databases.

Hypotheses are:

1. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in promoting treatment adherence among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
2. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in preventing arrest, incarceration, emergency department and inpatient hospital use among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

FACT (Forensic Assertive Community Treatment) is an adaptation of the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model that addresses a significant gap in our service delivery systems by targeting the interface between mental health and criminal justice services. ACT was originally developed to engage severely mentally ill adults in outpatient psychiatric treatment through the use of assertive outreach and comprehensive services. FACT adds legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring to ACT, which is comprehensive, high intensity, mobile, psychiatric treatment.

The FACT model (ACT + legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring) will be compared to enhanced outpatient treatment (close outpatient follow-up without judicial monitoring). Seventy adults with psychotic disorders in Monroe County who are convicted of a misdemeanor will be randomly assigned to each treatment group and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes will include criminal justice and mental health service utilization rates, treatment adherence, psychiatric symptoms, substance abuse, and homelessness. Service utilization outcomes will be tracked using established mental health and criminal justice databases.

Hypotheses are:

1. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in promoting treatment adherence among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
2. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in preventing arrest, incarceration, emergency department and inpatient hospital use among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Psychotic Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT)

Individuals in this arm will receive the services of an Assertive Community Treatment team and close supervision of a judge trained in the FACT model.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Individuals in this arm will receive the services of an Assertive Community Treatment team and close supervision of a judge trained in the FACT model.

Enhanced Treatment as Usual

Individuals in this arm of the study will receive an expedited appointment at a clinic specializing in the treatment of psychotic disorders. These individuals will receive the services of a therapist, psychiatrist, and case manager.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Enhanced Treatment as Usual

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Individuals in this arm of the study will receive an expedited appointment at a clinic specializing in the treatment of psychotic disorders. These individuals will receive the services of a therapist, psychiatrist, and case manager.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT)

Individuals in this arm will receive the services of an Assertive Community Treatment team and close supervision of a judge trained in the FACT model.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Enhanced Treatment as Usual

Individuals in this arm of the study will receive an expedited appointment at a clinic specializing in the treatment of psychotic disorders. These individuals will receive the services of a therapist, psychiatrist, and case manager.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Individuals diagnosed with any psychotic disorder such as Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder with Psychotic Features, Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features, and Psychotic Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified.
* Individuals currently facing misdemeanor or violation charges who have not yet been sentenced.

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals do not have or cannot be diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.
* Individuals currently facing felony charges
* Individuals currently involved in any type of legal leverage including probation, parole, drug or mental health court supervision, Assisted Outpatient Treatment, or Criminal Procedure Law status.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Rochester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Steven Lamberti

Professor, Department of Psychiatry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

J Steven Lamberti, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Rochester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Monroe County Jail

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lamberti JS, Deem A, Weisman RL, LaDuke C. The role of probation in forensic assertive community treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Apr;62(4):418-21. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0418.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21459994 (View on PubMed)

Lamberti, J., & Weisman, R. (2010). Forensic assertive community treatment: Origins, current practice, and future directions. In H. Dlugacz (Ed.), Reentry Planning for Offenders With Mental Disorders (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 145-169). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lamberti, JS. (2011). Legal Leverage in the Treatment of Adults With Severe Mental Illness, in Workplace Violence in Mental Health and General Health Care Settings. Pages 225 - 236. M. Privitera, editor. Jones and Bartlett, Pages 225-236.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R34MH078003-03

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

5R34MH078003-03

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Recovery Legal Care Clinical Trial
NCT06618794 RECRUITING NA
Core Competency Model for Corrections
NCT06359574 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA