Driving Skills Recovery Following Procedural Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

NCT ID: NCT04350424

Last Updated: 2023-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-05

Study Completion Date

2020-03-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective cohort study that will analyze psychomotoric recovery using a commercially available driving simulator following sedation for endoscopic procedures in subjects undergoing elective outpatient endoscopic procedures. Patients receiving both propofol based sedation and well as those receiving a combination of fentanyl and midazolam will be studied. Baseline data will be obtained after training on the simulator. Following the procedure and after meeting standard discharge criteria, the subjects will undergo the same driving simulation to ascertain psychomotoric recovery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Procedural sedation for ambulatory endoscopy procedures is delivered millions of times per year in the United States. Current standard of care necessitates the presence of a responsible adult to take the patient from the endoscopic facility back home and to observe the patient. In addition, patients are frequently advised not to drive until the morning after the procedure. This recommendation holds true whether the procedure was performed in the morning or afternoon. Current data regarding psychomotoric recovery following procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy is quite limited. Moreover there are no data utilizing a driving simulator to gauge psychomotoric recovery in this setting.

The proposed study is a prospective, open label cohort study enrolling patients at the Cleveland Clinic's advanced endoscopy unit.

Inclusion criteria are: English speaking patients 18 years or older who currently hold a valid driver's license, are able to give informed consent and are undergoing either anesthesiologist directed propofol sedation (Group1) or a combination of an opioid and benzodiazepine targeting moderate sedation (Group 2) for elective outpatient procedures including advanced (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic submucosal dissection, deep enteroscopy) and non-advanced (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy) procedures.

Exclusion criteria include: inpatients, patients with altered mental status, legal blindness, physical limitations that would not make them candidates to be tested in the driving simulator, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) ≥ 4 , urgent procedures, systolic hypotension defined as a systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg and patients in whom English is not the primary language.

Upon enrollment the following information will be obtained: Age, gender, BMI, intended procedure, Mallampati score, medications and allergies, comorbidities (obesity, history of cardiac disease, renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes mellitus, and the use of medications narcotics, antidepressants and sedatives.

Upon enrollment, the patient will undergo a 5-10 minute training session on a commercially available driving simulator. Following this, the subjects will complete a 5 minute standardized driving simulation. The subjects will then undergo their scheduled procedure.

Procedural data that will be obtained will include the type and doses of sedatives/analgesics utilized, procedure type, procedure length, use of any reversal agents or airway devices such as oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal airways. In addition the occurrence of any intraprocedural cardiopulmonary unintended events such as hypotension, bradycardia and apnea will also be recorded.

Once the patient arrives in the recovery unit, they will be assessed every 5 minutes utilizing the observers scale for sedation and alertness (OAS). Discharge criteria would include; An OAS score of 5 (responding readily to name, with no evidence for ptosis; blood pressure and heart rate within 20% of baseline, oxygen saturation greater than 90% while breathing room air, the ability to walk without instability and the ability to drink liquids). The time from completion of the procedure to reaching the discharge criteria will be noted. At the time of reaching the discharge threshold, a repeat driving simulation will be performed utilizing the same program.

Simulator outcome variables will be analyzed by both parametric and nonparametric statistics. The variables that will be analyzed include: number of off road crashes, number of collisions with vehicles and other roadway objects, number of times over the posted speed limit, percentage of time over the posted limit, total number of times the center line was crossed, total number of times the driver went off the road, percentage of time out of lanes, overall turn signal usage, minimum distance to vehicles in drivers pedal reaction time. In addition, a summation of overall driving errors will be obtained.

An analysis comparing baseline and recovery driving simulator data within each sedation arm (anesthesiologist administered propofol or endoscopist directed opioid/benzodiazepine) will be performed. In a addition for each sedation arm, a univariate and multivariate analysis will be performed to evaluate for factors associated with delayed recovery of driving simulator performance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Psychomotor Status

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Propofol Arm

Outpatients receiving anesthesiologist-administered propofol for elective outpatient endoscopic procedures

No interventions assigned to this group

Opioid / Benzodiazepine Arm

Outpatients receiving endoscopist-administered opioid / benzodiazepine for elective outpatient endoscopic procedures

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* English speaking subjects ≥18 years
* Currently hold a valid driver's license
* Able to give informed consent
* Undergoing either anesthesiologist directed propofol sedation targeting deep sedation (Group1) or a combination of an opioid and benzodiazepine targeting moderate sedation (Group 2) for elective outpatient procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* Inpatients
* Subjects patients with altered mental status
* Subjects with legal blindness
* Physical limitations that would not make them candidates to be tested in the driving simulator
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification score ≥ 4
* Urgent procedures
* Systolic hypotension defined as a systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg
* Subjects in whom English is not a primary language.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Vargo

John J. Vargo, MD, MPH; Director Endoscopy Operations, Cleveland Clinic

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John J Vargo, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bajaj JS, Heuman DM, Wade JB, Gibson DP, Saeian K, Wegelin JA, Hafeezullah M, Bell DE, Sterling RK, Stravitz RT, Fuchs M, Luketic V, Sanyal AJ. Rifaximin improves driving simulator performance in a randomized trial of patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Gastroenterology. 2011 Feb;140(2):478-487.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.061. Epub 2010 Sep 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20849805 (View on PubMed)

Baskin-Bey ES, Stewart CA, Mitchell MM, Bida JP, Rosenthal TJ, Nyberg SL. Preliminary report of the Hepatic Encephalopathy Assessment Driving Simulator (HEADS) score. Ethn Dis. 2008 Summer;18(3):357-64.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18785452 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB 18-1451

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gastric POCUS Clear Liquids
NCT07214909 COMPLETED NA