Evaluation of the Clinical Performances of a Point of Care Analyzer Enabling Pre-transfusion ABOD Group Ultimate Verification at the Patient Bedside

NCT ID: NCT04344613

Last Updated: 2025-10-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-10

Study Completion Date

2025-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. However, this strategy is entirely manual, requires an extremely time-consuming learning program and relies on a subjective interpretation of agglutination on ABO test cards (for example Biorad, Diagast).

The ULB spinoff Antigon developed a prototype device on the basis of a technology developed in the Translational research laboratory of CHU-Brugmann, ULB. This device is specifically dedicated to perform a "near patient" control of the blood group of the patient and of the blood bag just before transfusion, and to control that the right blood bag is given to the right patient by cross-checking their identifications. The principle of the assay relies on an agglutination and filtration in a disk including anti A,B and D antibodies.

The goal of this study is to validate the analytical performances of this device (phase A) and to validate the clinical performances of this device (phase B).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. However, this strategy is entirely manual, requires an extremely time-consuming learning program and relies on a subjective interpretation of agglutination on ABO test cards (for example Biorad, Diagast).

The ULB spinoff Antigon developed a prototype device on the basis of a technology developed in the Translational research laboratory of CHU-Brugmann, ULB. This device is specifically dedicated to perform a "near patient" control of the blood group of the patient and of the blood bag just before transfusion, and to control that the right blood bag is given to the right patient by cross-checking their identifications. The principle of the assay relies on an agglutination and filtration in a disk including anti A,B and D antibodies.

Results of a preliminary study using a first Proof of Concept Prototype demonstrated the feasibility of ABO determination with a simple device, eliminating manipulation and subjective interpretation responsible for transfusion errors.The investigators then developed an end-user friendly, portable device using disposable fluidic disks and including everything needed to perform an agglutination test to determine the ABO group + RHD status of a patient and a blood bag, or alternatively of two patients.The system is designed to be used near the patient just before the beginning of transfusion.

The goal of this study is to validate the analytical performances of this device (phase A) and to validate the clinical performances of this device (phase B).

Phase A will be conducted in the laboratory and will allow the determination of the cut off values for the quantitative optical measures. These cut-off values will define the presence or absence of antigens A, B or D. Blood groups will be determined using the prototype and compared to the blood group determined in the blood transfusion laboratory with an automate using gel filtration technology. The validation will be performed both on blood bag samples and on random EDTA blood samples collected from consecutive unselected patients of our institution for whom a blood group had been requested (no additional sampling procedure nor additional blood volume will be required). The performances of the defined cut-off values will be tested in a second step on additional blood pathological samples selected from the routine samples received at the laboratory. They will cover a large range of hematological and immunological anomalies susceptible to interfere with or impair test performance and results. Finally, tests will be run on residual blood samples of neonates.

Phase B will be conducted to investigate the performances of the device in real conditions for the ultimate control of the ABO compatibility by comparing the patient and blood bag ABO groups. It will be conducted for its most part inside the laboratory and for another part in clinical units where the test will be performed by the nurses, with the assistance of the technologist involved in the validation of the device. For the part of the study conducted inside the lab, blood bags routinely attributed to patients will be selected the be tested on the device in parallel with the blood from the correct patient or from a 'wrong' (with other blood group) patient, in order to simulate situations of transfusion errors and evaluate the performances of the device to identify and block these errors. If the results are satisfying, the device will be tested in real life at the bedside in real conditions of transfusion. For this part of validation the results provided by the device (expressed as Compatible/not compatible/undetermined) will be compared with the results obtained with the manual point of care compatibility control (according to local procedure), and with the known groups of the patient and the blood bag stored in the patient blood bank file.

The number of ABO tests both on patients and on blood bag from donors has been determined in accordance with the recommendations from European Commission for Technical Specifications for In vitro diagnostic medical devices. ABOD assay performances have to be evaluated on at least 3000 samples.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blood Transfusion Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blood samples

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ABODpoct device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The device has been developed by a consortium including the Université Libre de Bruxelles, research centers (SIRRIS, CER), a private company (CISEO), and the spin-off Antigon S.A..The device includes a reader and a disposable disk (ABOD disk) for testing one patient et a blood bag. Four blood drops from the patient are deposited on one side of the disk and 4 blood drops from the blood bag one the other side. The disk correctly filled is inserted in the reader and after 2 minutes the result is displayed on the screen as a message GO or No GO. In case of incompatibility or any other problem a red Stop message will appear on the screen.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ABODpoct device

The device has been developed by a consortium including the Université Libre de Bruxelles, research centers (SIRRIS, CER), a private company (CISEO), and the spin-off Antigon S.A..The device includes a reader and a disposable disk (ABOD disk) for testing one patient et a blood bag. Four blood drops from the patient are deposited on one side of the disk and 4 blood drops from the blood bag one the other side. The disk correctly filled is inserted in the reader and after 2 minutes the result is displayed on the screen as a message GO or No GO. In case of incompatibility or any other problem a red Stop message will appear on the screen.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* For the device evaluation inside the laboratory : every patient for whom a blood group is ordered to the blood transfusion laboratory.
* For the device bedside evaluation : each patient from the hematology unit (one day clinic) requiring a transfusion.

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergency circumstances requiring an urgent transfusion
* Patient older than 80 years old
* Patients with venous access
Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Francis Corazza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Francis Corazza

Head of Immunology Laboratory

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hanane El Kenz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Brugmann

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Brugmann

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LRT-ABOD- PICABO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.