Trauma Associated Bleeding: Effectiveness of an Early Coagulation Support Protocol
NCT ID: NCT03354559
Last Updated: 2017-11-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
235 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-01-01
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this multicenter, before and after study was to assess the effects of a new ECS protocol compared to the standard MTP in terms of blood products' consumption and clinical outcome.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this multicenter, before and after study was to assess the effects of a new ECS protocol compared to the standard MTP in terms of blood products' consumption and clinical outcome.
We undertook a before and after study using historical controls. We included all consecutive adult patients with major trauma at risk of bleeding admitted to the emergency department of two referral Trauma Centres in Rome, Italy (i.e. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli and S. Camillo Hospital). Patients treated in 2011-2012 were compared to patients treated in 2013-2014. In the second period, the ECS protocol was concomitantly implemented as standard of care in both trauma centers. Informed consent was waived as all the procedures were considered the standard of care in both periods.
During the control period (pre-ECS), patients were treated according to a MTP with the following targets: FFP/PRBC ratio ≥ 1:1.5, target platelet count \> 100.000 x 109/L. According to the ECS protocol applied in the study period, all included patients received an "initial resuscitation" ,defined as the period between hospital admission and the first available coagulation results (coagulation screen, fibrinogen level and/or viscoelastic monitoring and platelet count), with a fixed initial coagulation support of tranexamic acid (TA) 1 g intravenous bolus over 20 min followed by 1 g in continuous infusion over 8 hours and fibrinogen concentrate (FC) 2 g bolus along with 2 to 4 units of PRBCs. Point of care (POC) tests were systematically used to monitor coagulation and to guide subsequent interventions. FFP was not administered in the early treatment stage. Permissive hypotension (systolic arterial pressure 80-90 mmHg or mean arterial 50-60 mmHg) and a fluid restrictive strategy were applied until surgical bleeding control was achieved. However, when prolonged bleeding occurred and an increasing number of PRBCs (\>4 units) and fluid volume was required (\>2000 ml), plasma was transfused for hemodynamic and hemostatic resuscitation.
Data from the electronic records were matched with the blood bank registries to confirm the number of blood units transfused within the study's time span. For patients transferred from other hospitals, information regarding transfusions administered before admission were collected and matched with the blood banks' data.
Patients' characteristics at admission are summarized through mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. Median and interquartile range for scales and scores and relative frequencies are used for discrete variables. We tested the null hypothesis of no association between study period and patients' characteristics with the t-test, Wilcoxon test and chi-square test for the three types of variables, respectively. We estimated the mean difference in transfused units and length of stay between ECS and pre-ECS from unadjusted Poisson models, using the delta methods to estimate the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference. Findings were robust by replacing the Poisson model with a negative binomial distribution. In addition, we defined "multiple transfused patients" as those experiencing four or more RBC units during the first 24 hours. The cut-off of four PRBC units represented the sample 75th percentile.
We investigated the association between clinical features and the probability of multiple transfusion by means of univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. For the mortality outcome, we estimated the Relative Risk (RR) and its' 95% CI of death within the first 24 hours and within 28 days since admission for the post-ECS as compared to pre-ECS patients from Poisson models without adjustment for other variables. Among those surviving the first 24 hours, we replicated the analysis by considering death between the 2nd and the 28th day of hospital stay. Furthermore, we investigated whether differences in resources' use and mortality between ECS and pre-ECS were related to major patients' demographic and clinical features at presentation, including age (18-40, 40-65, 65+ years), severity of traumatic brain injury (head AIS \<4 vs. ≥ 4), and trauma severity (number of critical illness criteria; presence/absence of each criterion). These stratified analyses were performed including a study period patients' feature interaction in separated Poisson models and by formally testing the null hypothesis of equal efficacy of the ECS protocol among categories of patients through an F test. To further control for any residual difference in clinical features between pre and ECS groups, we compared the resource consumption, the probability of multiple transfusion and the mortality outcomes among propensity-score matched patients. The propensity score included the following variables: age, sex, ISS, AIS head, worse SBP, base excess, lactates, hemoglobin and platelets. For the statistical analyses, we used the SAS software, 9.4 release (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, US). The propensity score matching was performed using a standard macro.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
pre-ECS group
Data collection from 01-01-2011 to 31-12-2012. Patients were treated according to a massive transfusion protocol with the following targets: fresh frozen plasma(FFP)/packed red blood cells(PRBCs) ratio ≥ 1:1.5, target platelet count \> 100.000 x 10 9/L
No interventions assigned to this group
ECS group
Data collection from 01-01-2013 to 31-12-2014. Patients were treated according to the ECS protocol.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patient with at least one of the following criteria were present on admission: lactate ≥ 5 mmol/L, BE ≤ - 6, or Hb ≤ 9g/dL on the blood gas analysis and SBP\<90 mmHg
Exclusion Criteria
* patients who died en route
* patients who were transferred more than six hours after the trauma
* patients or with incomplete medical reports
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
San Camillo Hospital, Rome
OTHER
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maria Grazia Bocci
consultant physician; responsible coordinator on major trauma pathway
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14752/15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id