Comparison of Results of Different Surgical Techniques Used in Female Tubal Sterilization

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

194 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigator's aim in this study is to compare the results of tubal ligation surgery, one of the contraceptive methods, between different surgical techniques. 194 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 104 had vaginal approach, 44 had laparotomic and 46 had laparoscopic tube ligation surgery. These surgical techniques are statistically was compared; Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) after surgery, in terms of duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, cost to hospital and amount of blood loss. As a result of the analysis; tubal sterilization technique performed with vaginal colpotomy were found to be more successful than other techniques; Visual Analog Pain Scale score, postoperative hospital stay, operation time and cost.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

vNOTES in Elective Bilateral Salpingectomy for Sterilization

NCT04809428

Sterility, Female

COMPLETED

Neural Therapy Effect and Bilateral Tubal Ligation

NCT03891537

Tubal Obstruction Dysmenorrhea

COMPLETED

Urological Complications and Management After Gynecological Operations

NCT04042129

Urological Injury Gynecologic Disease

COMPLETED

Comparison of the Effects of Vaginal Cuff Closure Sexual Function in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT07228351

Uterus Absent

AVAILABLE

Driving Factors of Decision Making for Prophylactic Salpingectomy Versus Tubal Ligation at the Time of Cesarean Section

NCT03830502

Salpingectomy Sterilization, Tubal

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study compared the peroperative effects and postoperative results of different surgical techniques with three different techniques in patients undergoing tubal sterilization.

surgical techniques used:

1. Mini Laparotomic tubal ligation
2. Laparoscopic tubal ligation
3. tubal ligation by posterior colpotomy

A total of 194 patients were included in the study. Tubal ligation was performed in 44 patients with mini laparotomy, 46 patients with laparoscopy and 104 patients with posterior colpotomy technique.

The following parameters were evaluated in the study

1. Parity
2. How many of their previous births are vaginal delivery, how many are cesarian section
3. 6th hour Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) score
4. 24th hour Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) score
5. Preoperative - postoperative hmg differences
6. Surgery time
7. Length of hospital stay

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sterilization, Tubal Visual Analog Pain Scale

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mini Laparotomic

In patients undergoing spinal anesthesia, a suprapubic 3-5 centimeter incision was entered into the abdomen. After both tubes were isolated, bilateral tube ligation was performed by Pomeroy method. After bleeding control was achieved, it was repaired in accordance with the anatomy of the abdomen.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tubal sterilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic

In patients undergoing general anesthesia, Verres was inserted into the abdomen through the umbilicus. Pneumo peritoneum was created with carbon dioxide (CO2). Optical imaging was placed into the abdomen from the umbilicus with 10-trochar. Auxiliary trochars from 3 centimeter supero-medial of both spina iliaca anterior superior were placed in the abdomen. bilateral tubas were isolated. Bilateral tubal ligation was performed with the help of bipolar cautery. bleeding control was achieved. trochars were taken out of the abdomen. the skin was closed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tubal sterilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

posterior colpotomy

The patient underwent spinal anesthesia and was placed in a high lithotomy position. cervical uteri was observed with the help of speculum. A 3 centimeter vertical incision was opened 2 centimeter below the cervix uteri. Peritoneal cavity was entered from this area. bilateral tubas were isolated. Bilateral tubal ligation was performed using the pomeroy method. bleeding control was achieved. peritoneal and posterior cervical incision line was repaired.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR