Standard Tubal Ligation Versus Salpingectomy for Sterilization at the Time of Cesarean Delivery
NCT ID: NCT03028623
Last Updated: 2018-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-01
2018-03-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This randomized, prospective clinical trial will compare the two sterilization methods to demonstrate that salpingectomy compared with standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery will not result in increased operative time, blood loss or other complications. This study is necessary to promote salpingectomy as a standard sterilization method during cesarean deliveries.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Sterilization at the Time of Cesarean Delivery
NCT03135431
Salpingectomy During Cesarean Section
NCT02880423
Comparison of Two Salpingectomy Techniques for Sterilization at the Time of Cesarean Delivery
NCT06273683
Salpingectomy at Cesarean Delivery for Ovarian Cancer Reduction (SCORE)
NCT02374827
Driving Factors of Decision Making for Prophylactic Salpingectomy Versus Tubal Ligation at the Time of Cesarean Section
NCT03830502
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Tubal sterilization will be performed by standard tubal ligation, either Parkland or Pomeroy technique, at the time of cesarean section
Tubal ligation
Standard tubal ligation by either Parkland or Pomeroy technique will be performed at cesarean section
Experimental
Tubal sterilization will be performed by bilateral salpingectomy using a ligasure device at the time of cesarean section.
Salpingectomy
Bilateral salpingectomy will be performed instead of standard tubal ligation as sterilization during cesarean section.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Salpingectomy
Bilateral salpingectomy will be performed instead of standard tubal ligation as sterilization during cesarean section.
Tubal ligation
Standard tubal ligation by either Parkland or Pomeroy technique will be performed at cesarean section
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects must be able to read and provide written informed consent
* Subjects must be English or Spanish speaking
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with a history of prior tubal surgery
* Subjects with a placenta accreta
* Subjects undergoing trial of labor after cesarean delivery
21 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Virginia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kate Pettit, MD
Assistant Professor, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kate' Pettit, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Virginia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Garcia C, Moskowitz OM, Chisholm CA, Duska LR, Warren AL, Lyons GR, Pettit KE. Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002674.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19517
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.