Salpingectomy During Cesarean Section

NCT ID: NCT02880423

Last Updated: 2016-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Based on the accumulated literature, salpingectomy may significantly reduce the risk for ovarian cancer. If investigators can prove that there is no increase in surgical complications and morbidity during salpingectomy in CS, compared to tubal ligation, investigators can recommend for women who are interested in sterilization- salpingectomy during cesarean section .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Until recently, ovarian resection was considered the only option to prevent ovarian cancer. Recently new evidence showing that the fallopian tube itself may be the source of certain types of ovarian cancer. So salpingectomy, may offer some protection. However, the extent of this protection has not been determined. Therefore, and based on the foregoing, the investigators think there is an advantage in removal of fallopian tubes rather than tubal ligation Cesarean sections. Given the lack of evidence in the literature about the complications of this procedure, currently the investigators organize a study examines the rate of complications of salpingectomy compared to tubal ligation during cesarean section.

Therefore, the main objective of the study is to assess the incidence of intra-operative complications during cesarean section.

The effect of the procedure will be examined on the following indicators:

1. The duration of the operation,
2. The rates of bleeding during the operation as estimated by the surgeon,
3. hemoglobin before and after the surgery,
4. Rates of giving blood or after surgery
5. The technical difficulty in performing tubal resection according to surgeon assessment
6. The need for further surgical intervention

A secondary objective of the study is evaluating the long-term complications:

1. Assessment of pain intensity at three months after surgery
2. Evaluation of menopausal symptoms, three months after surgery
3. Test ovarian sonar and Doppler three months after surgery
4. Testing the value of AMH three months after surgery

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

salpingectomy group I

salpingectomy during cesarean section for sterilization

Group Type OTHER

salpingectomy group I

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

women who agreed to participate in the study and assigned randomly to this group will have salpingectomy during cesarean section for sterilization.

tubal ligation group II

tubal ligation in cesarean section

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tubal ligation group II

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Every woman , who is eligible to enter the study in terms of the above criteria , will receive a detailed explanation of the study and will review the consent form , and then be asked whether she agrees to participate in . If so , the participant will stamped on the informed consent form .

The control group will be women who undergo tubal ligation method BTL during cesarean section . All women will be invited to follow up about three months after surgery. The women will answer questionnaire to quantify the symptoms of menopause by NAMS , blood test for AMH and sonar and Doppler examination of both the ovaries

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tubal ligation group II

Every woman , who is eligible to enter the study in terms of the above criteria , will receive a detailed explanation of the study and will review the consent form , and then be asked whether she agrees to participate in . If so , the participant will stamped on the informed consent form .

The control group will be women who undergo tubal ligation method BTL during cesarean section . All women will be invited to follow up about three months after surgery. The women will answer questionnaire to quantify the symptoms of menopause by NAMS , blood test for AMH and sonar and Doppler examination of both the ovaries

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

salpingectomy group I

women who agreed to participate in the study and assigned randomly to this group will have salpingectomy during cesarean section for sterilization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women planned for cesarean section , according to medical or obstetric indication , and seek sterilization
* Women aged 30 and older
* Women who are capable to understand , read and sign an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* women aged less then 30 years
* women who disagree to participate in the research
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bnai Zion Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

enab.kadour

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

sagi shlomi, md

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

helsinki bnai zion

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ISRAEL

Haifa, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

einav kadour, MD

Role: CONTACT

sagi shlomi, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Einav Kadour, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0012-16BNZ

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.