Diagnostic Value of Chest Ultrasound in Pediatrics Lung Diseases

NCT ID: NCT04326972

Last Updated: 2020-03-30

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Total Enrollment: 50 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2020-10-01
• Study Completion Date: 2021-11-30

Brief Summary

To evaluate the accuracy of chest ultrasound for diagnosis of different lung lesions in comparison to the gold standard among children.

Detailed Description

Lung disease are the most common condition in pediatrics and also the primary cause of death among children less than 5 years old(Chen Shui-Wen et al.,2015).

Chest X ray consider as the first line to evalute the chest disease (Kim O et al. ,2000), in identified the pulmonary opacities (Ozkaya A et al., 2018),but there is limitation in the interpretation of the location and nature of an area of increase opacity on chest radiographs particularly in young infants with varied configuration of thymus and differentiation between pulmonary , pleural and mediastinal lesions is not always easy(Barillari A et al .,2011),so the thoracic computed tomography is recommended as diagnostic gold standard to follow up pediatric chest X ray opacities and masses(Lameh A et al. ,2019),but not consider as first line of radiological evaluation because each chest computed tomography gives to patient an effective dose of eight msv equivalent to four hundred chest X ray (Prithviraj D.,2014), also high cost ,and longe waiting times for imaging (Lameh A et al .,2019).

Chest sonography consider as first line investigation in evaluation of diaphragmatic ,pleural and chest wall lesions due to lack of superficial adipose tissue in pediatric patients (Goh Y, et al. ,2016),but undervalued for lungs lesion for many years ,because the ribs ,sternum and aerated lungs had been considered obstacles to ultrasound waves (Dietrich C, et al., 2015). However improvements in technology have lead to production of higher-resolution transducers and techniques such as tissue harmonic imaging, which lead to improved spatial resolution and deeper tissue penetration of ultrasound waves (Lameh A et al. ,2019),also the pathological processes as inflammations ,trauma or neoplastic within the chest wall ,pleural, and lungs result in profound changes in tissue composition and improved acoustic transmission and allow for adequate lungs sonographic evaluation(Dietrich C, et al., 2015).

Chest sonography serves as a powerful complementary diagnostic tool with advantage of easy availability ,rapid ,radiation free (Dietrich C, et al., 2015), repeatable and inexpensive methods, determining the high diagnostic accuracy in detecting pediatric chest lesions (Lameh A et al .,2019).

Causes of pediatric chest X ray opacity:

Radio-opacities are more common and significant compared to increased radiolucency , can be caused by many different pathologies and present with different patterns (Gelaw S.,2015), as:

Consolidation:

Caused by replacement of the air in distal airways and the alveoli by fluid or soft tissues. Radiological, this is seen as opacity of any size and mostly homogenous, it has no volume loss, has the tendency to coalescence, has ill-defined margins, non-segmental distribution, irregular shape, air bronchogram (Gelaw S.,2015).

By ultrasound its similar in echogenicity and echotexture to liver and spleen. Bronchograms present within the solid appearing area of echogenicity as multiple bright dot like , and branching linear structures represent air in bronchi and scattered residual air in alveoli(Barillari A et al. ,2011).

Differentiate from atelectasia by presence of dynamic air bronchogram (Barillari A et al .,2011).

Collapse (atelectasis):

This may affect the whole hemi-lung or sub-division of the lungs, such as the lobes , segments or subsegments of the lung. Radiological, it causes opacity and signs of volume loss(Gelaw S.,2015).

It is important to to differentiate focal areas of cosolidation from those of collapse ,since collapse may be associated with a foreign body inhalation or other extrinisic obstruction (Arthur R.,2003) . By chest ultrasound atelectasis similar in echogenicity and echotexture to liver and the air broncograms appear crowded and parallel (Barillari A et al.,2011).

Interstitial opacities:

This is the common presentation of chronic diffuse interstitial lung diseases (Gelaw S.,2015).

Lung ultrasound is an emerging tool in diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases by evaluation number of B lines ,pleural irregularities and nodules or consolidation (Falcetta et al., 2018).

Pleural/chest wall opacities:

Pleural opacities, such as pleural mass lesion, pleural thickening or calcification or mass arising from soft tissue or bony chest wall (Gelaw S., 2015) , in the pleural effusion is challenging to differentiate between the pleural effusion and consolidation by the X ray especially in hemithorax (Prina E., 2014).ultrasound provides detailed information about the nature of pleural fluid and allows one to determine whether a fluid collection is amenable to aspiration (Kim O et al., 2000).

Nodular opacities or mass:

These are rounded increased opacities that can be caused by different pathologies. Radiological , these can be seen on any location, with sizes ranging from pinpoint to mass (it is called mass if >3 cm), solitary or multiple (such as miliary nodules, if multiple small nodules ≈2 mm in diameter), can have different shapes; and margins can be smooth, umbilicated or lobulated. The outline can be sharp, ill-defined or speculated (Gelaw S.,2015).

Ring opacities:

These are annular opacities with central radiolucency usually due to cavitations of pre-existing lesion, but also can be caused by bullae, benign air cyst, loculated pneumothorax or fibrocystic changes (Gelaw S.,2015).

Linear opacities:

These are thin or thick (band shadow, if 5 mm or more) linear shadows. The most common abnormal linear opacity is a scar. Post-primary tuberculosis commonly heals with fibrosis presenting with irregular linear opacities with or without volume loss (Gelaw S.,2015).

Conditions

Lung Diseases

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: CASE_ONLY
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

ultrasound

• All patients with inclusion criteria do for them chest ultrasound .

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Age more than twenty eight day up to 18 yrs .

• Patients admitted in ER &chest wards ,with history of fever cough and dyspnea .
• Chest X ray opacity on recent admission .
• Patients who developed acute chest infection on top of chronic respiratory disease .

Exclusion Criteria

• • Neonate .

• Chronic disease as cardiac disease

• Minimum Eligible Age: 29 Days
• Maximum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Dhekra Ashour Aboud Salem

M.S.C

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Fatma Hassan, professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assiut University

Yasser Rezk, Lecturer

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assiut University

Mohamed Aboelela, Lecturer

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assiut University

Sahar Youssif, Lecturer

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assiut University

Central Contacts

Dhekra Salem, M.S.C

Role: CONTACT

pediaosha30@gmail.com

01140856720

Other Identifiers

chest ultrasound in pediatrics

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id