The Relationship Between Segmental Trunk Control and Gross Motor Performance in Low Birth Weight Born Infant

NCT ID: NCT04313478

Last Updated: 2022-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

85 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to examine the relation between trunk control and gross motor performance in LBW and NBW infants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preterm infants are observed to have reduced trunk extension in the prone position, rigid postural patterns while reaching a toy, fewer movement reactions, trunk rotation, head control, and muscle tone than term infants. To distinguish between the infant with typical motor development and the one with atypical / abnormal motor development and to follow up the level of their trunk controls is important to identify of the motor development delay in the early stage of life.

This cross-sectional study included 42 LBW infants and 43 NBW infants at between 3 and 9 months of age. We investigated the association between the gross motor function and the segmental trunk controls of the LBW infants at the 3-9 months of age compared to NBW infants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early Intervention Low Birth Weight Infants Term Infants

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low Birth Weight Infants

They were as follows: being at 3 to 9 months' corrected age, gestational age of less than 36 weeks + 6 days, birth weight of 2000 g or less. Infants with any genetic, metabolic, orthopedic congenital abnormalities or chronic diseases and parents' rejection to participate in the study were excluded.

Low Birth Weight and Normal Weight infants

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This cross-sectional study included LBW and NW infants at between 3 and 9 months of age. The levels of trunk control were investigated by using the Segmental Assessment Trunk Control (SATCo). The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) were used for assessment of gross motor performance and identify typical and atypical motor development of infants.

Normal Weight Infants

They were as follows: being between 3 and 9 months of age, being full-term, had no complications during delivery. Infants that presented any type of sensory or motor disorder were excluded.

Low Birth Weight and Normal Weight infants

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This cross-sectional study included LBW and NW infants at between 3 and 9 months of age. The levels of trunk control were investigated by using the Segmental Assessment Trunk Control (SATCo). The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) were used for assessment of gross motor performance and identify typical and atypical motor development of infants.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low Birth Weight and Normal Weight infants

This cross-sectional study included LBW and NW infants at between 3 and 9 months of age. The levels of trunk control were investigated by using the Segmental Assessment Trunk Control (SATCo). The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) were used for assessment of gross motor performance and identify typical and atypical motor development of infants.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* the written consent given by the parents,
* being at 3 to 9 months' corrected age,
* gestational age of less than 36 weeks + 6 days,
* birth weight of 2000 g or less.

Exclusion Criteria

* Infants with any genetic, metabolic, orthopedic congenital abnormalities or chronic diseases and parents' rejection to participate in the study
* Term infants that presented any type of sensory or motor disorder were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Marmara University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Seval Kutlutürk

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

28.03.2014-9

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sensorimotor Stimulation on Oral Feeding
NCT06700135 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Perinatal Risk Factors in Motor Development
NCT07310459 NOT_YET_RECRUITING