Sensory and Motor Proficiency For Children With Spina Bifida
NCT ID: NCT05318677
Last Updated: 2022-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
35 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-01-31
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There are some studies in the literature showing that upper extremity motor function is affected in patients with spina bifida. However, no study was found in which the upper extremity was investigated in terms of sensory and motor proficiency.The social and professional aspects of the upper extremity are of great importance.Therefore, our study aims to investigate the effects of upper extremity sensory and motor proficiency in patients with spina bifida
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physical Capacity of Spina Bifida and Factors Affecting
NCT06541366
The Relationship Between Developmental Level in Infancy and Preschool Motor Performance in Risky Infants
NCT06015347
Spina Bifida in Daily Life: an Exploratory Study
NCT03148301
An Audit of the Posterior Fossa Characterization in Open Spina Bifida Based on Tertiary Center Experience
NCT03544970
Sleep-disordered Breathing in Infants With Myelomeningocele
NCT04251806
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Children with literate, well cooperated, aged 8-12 years, and attending any primary school were included in the study. Children who had a second illness and could not be contacted were not included in the study. Non-dominant and dominant extremities of all cases were evaluated by the tests. It was recorded socio-demographic data were questioned. Sensory evaluation forms for upper extremities, Bruininks-Oseretsky motor proficiency, and ability tests were administered by a physiotherapist.
All sensory evaluations; In a quiet, bright, warm room with only the physiotherapist and the subject, the evaluation was made while the subject was sitting in a chair with back support.
* Stereognosis: For the evaluation of stereognosis, the subject was asked to recognize the materials placed in his hand by using a pen, paper, clip, cotton, and coin while his visual field was closed. Both dominant and nondominant extremities were evaluated.
* Graphesthesia: When the visual field is closed, square, triangle, circle, and cross signs drawn on the palms of the subjects were asked to know these shapes.
* Finger identification: The patient's fingers were numbered and the patient was asked to know which finger was touched by touching his finger while his visual field was closed, verbally or by showing.
* Kinesthetic sense of hands: A total of 9 evaluations were made, the first of which was a trial, while the patient's visual field was closed. The evaluation was made for both dominant and nondominant extremities. The evaluation was made with both eyes open and closed.8 Evaluation under the title of visual and kinesthetic kinesthesia was scored between 0-3.
* The motor proficiency and ability level of the cases were evaluated with the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test, which is used to evaluate the motor abilities of children aged 4.5-14.5 years in pediatric rehabilitation. The test consists of a total of 46 tests, 8 of which are subtests. Subtests to be applied to the patients in the study: Drawing lines through the path and folding paper tests were performed for the fine motor precision test.
Copying a square and copying star tests were applied for fine motor integration.
Transferring coins has been applied for manual dexterity. The case took the coin with the dominant hand and puts it in the box with the non-dominant hand. The number of coins left in the well in 15 seconds is calculated. The case was given 2 attempts.For upper extremity coordination, the tests of dropping and catching the ball with both hands and dribbling the ball with alternating hands were applied. For the test of dropping and catching the ball with both hands, the subject was given a tennis ball and asked to catch the ball by throwing it on the ground with both hands. A trial was allowed before starting the test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Fifteen patients with spina bifida aged 8-12 years living in Denizli province were included in the study. The participants were informed about the research and read the voluntary consent form, and written consent was obtained from their families since the participants were children.
Children with literate, well cooperated, aged 8-12 years, and attending any primary school were included in the study. Children who had a second illness and could not be contacted were not included in the study. Non-dominant and dominant extremities of all cases were evaluated by the tests. It was recorded socio-demographic data were questioned. Sensory evaluation forms for upper extremities, Bruininks-Oseretsky motor proficiency, and ability tests were administered by a physiotherapist.
No interventions assigned to this group
2
20 healthy subjects as a control group aged 8-12 years living in Denizli province were included in the study. The participants were informed about the research and read the voluntary consent form, and written consent was obtained from their families since the participants were children.
Children with literate, well cooperated, aged 8-12 years, and attending any primary school were included in the study. Children who had a second illness and could not be contacted were not included in the study. Non-dominant and dominant extremities of all cases were evaluated by the tests. It was recorded socio-demographic data were questioned. Sensory evaluation forms for upper extremities, Bruininks-Oseretsky motor proficiency, and ability tests were administered by a physiotherapist.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
8 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pamukkale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ozden Baskan
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ozden Baskan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pamukkale University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AKitis
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
OBaskan
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.