Self-esteem and Neuro-urological Follow-up in Patients With Spina Bifida or Spinal Cord Injury
NCT ID: NCT01606618
Last Updated: 2021-04-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
111 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-03-12
2017-09-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main objective of this study is to highlight a difference in the level of global self-esteem among a population of adult patients with spina bifida and a population of adult patients with traumatic spinal cord injury gained the same level of neurological.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Urinary Markers of Detrusor Overactivity in Spina Bifida Patients
NCT02852317
Spina Bifida in Daily Life: an Exploratory Study
NCT03148301
Assessment of Functional Independence and Quality of Life in Adolescents With Spina Bifid
NCT00966927
An Audit of the Posterior Fossa Characterization in Open Spina Bifida Based on Tertiary Center Experience
NCT03544970
Determining Developmental and Clinical Markers Affecting Urinary Function of Children With Spinal Dysraphism
NCT05962086
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One of the major stakes for these patients is the preservation of a regular follow-up of uro-nephrologicals risk factors and of a respect for the rules of self management of their neurological bladder. However, some studies report that nearly two thirds of these patients are not monitored at regular neuro-urological in the adulthood. Different psychosocial determinants were analyzed as potential markers of the impact of chronic diseases from childhood to adulthood and could account for the disparity of follow-up and access to healthcare. Among these, the self-esteem is a psychological dimension of analysis particularly relevant within the framework of chronic states inherited from the childhood.
The investigators formulate the hypothesis that global self-esteem and lower perceived self-efficacy may be a causal predictive factor of a reduced access to the continence and a lower compliance monitoring in adult patients with a spina bifida.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spina bifida aperta
No interventions assigned to this group
Acquired traumatic spinal cord injury
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 60
* Knowing how to read, write, count
* Having given their free, informed and in writing consent (an information is also given to the reliable person when it exists)
* Affiliated to the National Health Service
Exclusion Criteria
* Score MMS lower than 27 ( GRECO version)
* Serious associated pathology or associated pathology which could interfer with the management of vesico-sphincteral disorders
* Neurosurgery, dating from less than one year
* Symptoms of dysfunction of ventricular bypass valve at the time of inclusion
* Clinical epileptic attack within six months prior to inclusion
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Simultaneous inclusion in an another therapeutic protocol or period of exclusion from an another protocol
* Traumatic spinal cord injury acquired before age 16
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rennes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jacques Kerdraon, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Rennes
Reymann Jean Michel, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Rennes University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Besançon
Besançon, , France
Clinique Saint Augustin
Bordeaux, , France
CHU de Lille
Lille, , France
Urologie CH Lyon Sud et Hôpital Henry Gabrielle
Lyon, , France
APHM - Hôpital de la Conception Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale
Marseille, , France
MPR neurologique CHU de Nantes
Nantes, , France
APHP Raymond Poincaré
Paris, , France
APHP Rothschild
Paris, , France
Neuro-urologie et explorations périnéales, APHP Tenon
Paris, , France
Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation Fonctionnelles de KERPAPE
Ploemeur, , France
CHU de Rennes CR Spina bifida
Rennes, , France
Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU de Rennes
Rennes, , France
MPR St Hélier
Rennes, , France
Urologie, CHU de Rouen
Rouen, , France
MPR CHU Rangueuil
Toulouse, , France
Urologie CHU Rangueuil Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B110797-30
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.