Comparison of Posterior and Anterior Approach to Sacrospinous Ligament Apical Fixation - Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT04306250

Last Updated: 2024-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

280 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-09

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem among women. Apical prolapse (AP) is a prolapse of the uterus, or vaginal cuff, in women post hysterectomy.

Apical fixation to the sacrospinous ligament (SSLF) was first introduced in 1968 by K.RICHTER. .In a large review study, the subjective cure rate after SSLF ranged from 70 to 98%, while objective cure rate was 67-97%.

The success rates of SSLF in a randomized study comparing SSLF to uterosacral ligament fixation after two years were 63.1%. In women with combined apical and anterior wall prolapse, SSLF can be performed in two ways: anterior access through the anterior vaginal wall or posterior approach through the posterior vaginal wall.

A retrospective comparison of the two methods was performed, demonstrating some efficacy to the anterior approach over the posterior approach mainly in respect to the vaginal length.

From the literature review to date, no comparisons were made between the methods in a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To compare the success rates between two approaches (anterior and posterior) for SSLF

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem among women and its incidence is rising due to population aging. Approximately 11-19% of women will undergo surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or urinary incontinence during their lifetime and approximately 30% will need repeat surgery during their lifetime .Apical prolapse (AP) is a prolapse of the uterus, or vaginal cuff, in women post hysterectomy. The severity of the prolapsed organ can be graded according to the POP-Q classification .There are several approaches to apical fixation, some of which are done vaginally and include fixation by sutures to the uterosacral ligament (USLF) or the sacrospinous ligament (SSLF). A mesh can be used for ligament fixation as well. The abdominal approach is also an option, the sacro-colpo-pexy fixation using a Y mesh. Apical fixation to the SSL was first introduced in 1968 by K.RICHTER. medical devices such as the Capio that assist in performing SSLF were also developed with ease.

In a review article that included 2,390 women undergoing SSLF subjective cure rate ranged from 70 to 98%, while objective cure rate was 67-97% .Such fixation in combination with posterior or anterior wall repair, especially after hysterectomy, showed a 94% objective cure rate at 7-year postoperative follow-up. A randomized study (The "OPTIMAL randomised trial") comparing SSLF with USLF found no preference for either method. Success rates were measured according to three criteria - 1) no significant vaginal dome or one of the vaginal walls 2) no vaginal bulge symptoms 3) no need for repeated surgery within two years of the original surgery. According to this study, the success rates of SSLF after two years were 63.1%.

Among women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse and AP, SSLF can be performed in two ways: anterior access, ie dissection through the anterior wall of the vagina or fixation through the posterior wall of the vagina. A retrospective comparison of the two methods was performed, demonstrating some efficacy in anterior approach in terms of vaginal length and postoperative apical fixation with less reference to healing rates or impact on the anterior compartment, compared with a posterior approach.

From the literature review to date, no comparisons were made between the methods in a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To compare the success rates of two approaches (anterior and posterior) for SSLF

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

anterior approach for apical fixation to the SSL

In this group the apical fixation will be done using the anterior access, ie dissection through the anterior vaginal wall.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Apical prolapse fixation - anterior access

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The surgery is done in anterior access

posterior approach for apical fixation to the SSL

In this group the apical fixation will be done using the posterior access, ie fixation through the vaginal posterior wall.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Apical prolapse fixation - posterior access

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The surgery is done in posterior access

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Apical prolapse fixation - anterior access

The surgery is done in anterior access

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Apical prolapse fixation - posterior access

The surgery is done in posterior access

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women with grade 2 or above apical prolapse, according to POP Q, combined with Grade II or above of anterior wall prolapse.
* Women who suffer from symptomatic POP and care for a surgical treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Women with a contra-indication for surgical treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

HaEmek Medical Center, Israel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Meirav Braverman

medical doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

meirav breverman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

haemek medical center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Haemek Medical Center

Afula, , Israel

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

meirav breverman, MD

Role: CONTACT

97246495507

eyal rom, MD

Role: CONTACT

97246495507

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Meirav Breverman, MD

Role: primary

Sivan Witzman

Role: backup

972-4-6495348

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

145-19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA